Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


DirectAdmin Pro Pack - Page 3
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

DirectAdmin Pro Pack

13»

Comments

  • @DA_Mark Any plans to start supporting multi-languages officially ?
    A panel as popular and well spread as DirectAdmin (Soon might as well become #1) shouldn't rely on community support only for this important key feature (Localization).

    At least the panel should support the 10 most common ones.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_languages_by_total_number_of_speakers
    https://blog.cpanel.com/localization-more-languages-better-quality/

  • @PandoGulf said:
    @DA_Mark Any plans to start supporting multi-languages officially ?
    A panel as popular and well spread as DirectAdmin (Soon might as well become #1) shouldn't rely on community support only for this important key feature (Localization).

    At least the panel should support the 10 most common ones.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_languages_by_total_number_of_speakers
    https://blog.cpanel.com/localization-more-languages-better-quality/

    I think they are already working on it https://translate.directadmin.com/

    Thanked by 1PandoGulf
  • @desfire said:

    @PandoGulf said:
    @DA_Mark Any plans to start supporting multi-languages officially ?
    A panel as popular and well spread as DirectAdmin (Soon might as well become #1) shouldn't rely on community support only for this important key feature (Localization).

    At least the panel should support the 10 most common ones.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_languages_by_total_number_of_speakers
    https://blog.cpanel.com/localization-more-languages-better-quality/

    I think they are already working on it https://translate.directadmin.com/

    This is a community based work... in fact I'm one of the translators for one of the languages there ! :)

    Thanked by 1MichaelCee
  • DA_MarkDA_Mark Member
    edited January 2021

    @PandoGulf Translations is a universal feature (not Pro Pack) but it's a perfect example of how we are trying to do the best we can with the resources we have.

    A fully multilingual interface has been requested for a long time, but with a core of lifetime and insanely discounted DC licenses, retaining a group of translators isn't really that practical. Or at least, we would rather use our limited resources for other things. :)

    For the most part, most were fine with this explanation They were more than willing to do some typing so they could offer their customers DA in their local language. The problem was that we didn't give them the means to do it.

    So translate.directadmin.com solves that part of it. Anyone can make any translation a reality, upload/download translations, and implement them without delay (waiting for us to step in and do something). It's a fully real-time system.

    Now.. to have a group of the world's most popular languages always there, always updated -- not a bad request at all. It's just a matter of priorities, since there is only so much we can do. But these are good things to bring up because we certainly wish to do a good job on the core, not leave it behind in favor of the Pro Pack. In fact our next release will have good stuff for all. We plan to prove this Pro Pack thing doesn't mean slacking off. :)

  • JamesFJamesF Member, Host Rep

    @DA_MARK - Looking forward to the Pro Pack.

    Does DA have a recommended O/S these days to be compatible with all the new features coming etc... ?

    Thanked by 1seriesn
  • DA_MarkDA_Mark Member
    edited January 2021

    @JamesF said:
    @DA_MARK - Looking forward to the Pro Pack.

    Does DA have a recommended O/S these days to be compatible with all the new features coming etc... ?

    >

    If the per-user resource throttling is important, make sure to use any OS we list at the beginning of: https://docs.directadmin.com/other-hosting-services/pro-resource-throttling/general

    Honestly, pick the OS you are most at home with. Many are still surprised we've supported Debian/Ubuntu for a decade -- so it's a very stable option for those who prefer it.

    FreeBSD is the only one that isn't compatible with all the new features.

  • verovero Member, Host Rep

    You have added this recently to your site:

    Protection against arbitrary price increases only. Does not apply to inflation, extraordinary world events, currency devaluation, etc. Does not apply to add-ons given as a free gift/bonus.

    Could you explain:

    1. What does "arbitrary increase" means?
    2. "Does not apply to inflation": will you add inflation rate to the cost of licenses every year or other period?
    3. "extraordinary world events": could you provide a wider definition of this?
    4. "currency devaluation": you are using world reserve currency to sell your product, how will you determine devaluation of it? Did it ever happen or do you mean devaluation due to inflation?

    Sorry for OT, but these conditions need some clarification.

  • Totally OT -- feel free take it to our feedback thread instead. I believe the merits (if any) of such price statements were discussed there already. Pro Pack thread isn't best for rehashing older OT discussions.

  • verovero Member, Host Rep

    It wouldn't have taken more text symbols to answer all these instead of directing me nowhere, but it's ok, not the first time. I don't know how standard Linux features you implemented actually almost the last from control panels and called as "Pro Pack" can be more important than the product price itself, but we are free to have our own priorities. Sorry for intervention.

    Thanked by 1DA_Mark
  • @JamesF said:
    @DA_MARK - Looking forward to the Pro Pack.

    Does DA have a recommended O/S these days to be compatible with all the new features coming etc... ?

    New Resource Limiting features relay on systemd cgroups integration

    with Centos 8 you will get version 239 (you will be stuck with that for a long) waiting RH to backport solutions to an issue so the forks backport it ...

    with Ubuntu 20.04 it is 245

    Debian 10 is using 241 but will catch up in several months with official release of 11...

    (Going with Debian/Ubuntu you will have the option for in place OS upgrade https://forum.directadmin.com/threads/dist-upgrade-from-debian-5-to-6.40606/post-221826

    P.S. Since half decade ago majority of OpenStack Clouds are Ubuntu Based so let's do not open the topic for if Ubuntu is ok servers ... half of super stable centos VMs relay on kernel virtual machine from the ubuntu kernel :smiley:

    The Only reason we mass use Centos and Cloudlinux to choose to be RH based is cPanel dominance in the industry in the last decade...

  • AlwaysSkintAlwaysSkint Member
    edited January 2021

    ^ Relay? >:)
    Debian vs Ubuntu = no contest; KISS and sod snap et al.

  • SaahibSaahib Host Rep, Veteran
    edited January 2021

    @smtalk said:

    @Saahib said: Its not like that I am asking for more but as you mentioned on page about resource control, for mysql resource abuser, we have to look into CL as you dont' have any plan to implement it or do you ?

    What would you think about ability to limit these in MySQL:

    • Max queries per hour (all types of queries, including SELECT/INSERT/UPDATE)
    • Max UPDATE queries per hour
    • Max connections per hour
    • Max simultaneous connections at a time
    • Max time any query can be executed

    Would this be sufficient for MySQL limits?

    End goal is to stop user abusing resources, sometimes its bad script and sometimes user is intentionally running intensive queries on shared resources which is ok for short period but not for long period.

    I suppose last two can be more effective specially "max time any query can be executed" as it will save against badly formatted queries hogging up resources.

  • UmairUmair Member

    Has anyone tried to update to latest release with their provider's internal license??
    I see the section "Nginx Rewrite" enables on user level but it says "nginx template not enabled in your license"

    Seems like Internal licenses (i.e. the one you get from your VPS/Dedi providers) may not be getting pro-pack. Their is no pricing info as of yet. I wish they would make the info public.

  • seriesnseriesn Member

    @Umair said:
    Has anyone tried to update to latest release with their provider's internal license??
    I see the section "Nginx Rewrite" enables on user level but it says "nginx template not enabled in your license"

    Seems like Internal licenses (i.e. the one you get from your VPS/Dedi providers) may not be getting pro-pack. Their is no pricing info as of yet. I wish they would make the info public.

    I believe the pro pack is a work in progress and so is the pricing.

    I do hope that this becomes a value added option for dc license :). Maybe with discount, maybe without a discount. But it is definitely a good option to have :).

  • 100% agree!

    @coolice said:
    Guys selectable PHP Modules / Extensions will require pre-compiled php binaries

    that will cut at minimum 10% performance from the server and 97% + of the customers do not select anything custom ...

    here is benchmark of precompiled Cloud Linux one vs DA compiled 7.4 (opcache is on ) Latest available on the day of testing about 2 weeks ago ...

    Even it is latest RH / CL 8 kernel that is old and not fully recognize the Ryzen 3900 CPU on a newer kernel like Ubuntu 20.04 compiled for the AMD vs CL8 it can be more drastic difference

    Our main business is to sell shared access to CPU cores, RAM and Space if we can acheive 20% for the same server and bases that Ryzen 3900 is faster than Xeon silvers and some Xeon Golds and based on that 5 series are 12.5 faster on gcc compiling vs current one and up to 20% faster on benchmarks next year we will be killers on the market (scr*w the slectable modules) as difference will be visible with naked eays especially vs cPanel CL7 ones and older intel cores ...

    CL one Default module + Opcache

    `php bench.php

    | PHP BENCHMARK SCRIPT |

    Start : 2021-01-08 02:20:19
    Server : Linux/4.18.0-147.8.1.el8.lve.1.x86_64 x86_64
    Platform : Linux
    System : Linux
    CPU :
    model : AMD Ryzen 9 3900 12-Core Processor
    cores : 12
    available : 12
    MHz : 3094.186MHz
    Memory : 256 Mb available
    Benchmark version : 1.0.37
    PHP version : 7.4.12
    available modules :
    mbstring : yes
    json : yes
    pcre : yes
    Max execution time : 600 sec

    Crypt hash algo : MD5

    TEST NAME : SECONDS | OP/SEC | OP/SEC/MHz | MEMORY

    01_math : 1.492 sec | 670.26 kOp/s | 216.62 Ops/MHz | 2 Mb
    02_string_concat : 0.195 sec | 39.58 MOp/s | 12.79 kOps/MHz | 128.84 Mb
    03_1_string_number_concat : 1.479 sec | 3.38 MOp/s | 1.09 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb
    03_2_string_number_format : 1.334 sec | 3.75 MOp/s | 1.21 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb
    04_string_simple_functions : 1.301 sec | 998.96 kOp/s | 322.85 Ops/MHz | 4 Mb
    05_string_multibyte : 0.974 sec | 133.50 kOp/s | 43.14 Ops/MHz | 4 Mb
    06_string_manipulation : 2.462 sec | 528.13 kOp/s | 170.68 Ops/MHz | 4 Mb
    07_regex : 1.688 sec | 770.23 kOp/s | 248.93 Ops/MHz | 4 Mb
    08_1_hashing : 2.172 sec | 598.50 kOp/s | 193.43 Ops/MHz | 4 Mb
    08_2_crypt : 7.034 sec | 1.42 kOp/s | 0.46 Ops/MHz | 4 Mb
    09_json_encode : 2.110 sec | 616.17 kOp/s | 199.14 Ops/MHz | 4 Mb
    10_json_decode : 3.454 sec | 376.36 kOp/s | 121.64 Ops/MHz | 4 Mb
    11_serialize : 1.716 sec | 757.75 kOp/s | 244.90 Ops/MHz | 4 Mb
    12_unserialize : 2.141 sec | 607.19 kOp/s | 196.24 Ops/MHz | 4 Mb
    13_array_fill : 1.510 sec | 33.12 MOp/s | 10.70 kOps/MHz | 12 Mb
    14_array_range : 0.318 sec | 314.26 kOp/s | 101.57 Ops/MHz | 12 Mb
    14_array_unset : 1.509 sec | 33.13 MOp/s | 10.71 kOps/MHz | 12 Mb
    15_loops : 0.872 sec | 229.24 MOp/s | 74.09 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb
    16_loop_ifelse : 0.653 sec | 76.53 MOp/s | 24.73 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb
    17_loop_ternary : 1.087 sec | 46.01 MOp/s | 14.87 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb
    18_1_loop_defined_access : 0.342 sec | 58.55 MOp/s | 18.92 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb
    18_2_loop_undefined_access : 3.061 sec | 6.53 MOp/s | 2.11 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb
    19_type_functions : 0.724 sec | 4.15 MOp/s | 1.34 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb
    20_type_conversion : 0.723 sec | 4.15 MOp/s | 1.34 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb
    21_0_loop_exception_none : 0.040 sec | 100.87 MOp/s | 32.60 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb
    21_1_loop_exception_try : 0.047 sec | 84.72 MOp/s | 27.38 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb
    21_2_loop_exception_catch : 1.332 sec | 3.00 MOp/s | 970.26 Ops/MHz | 4 Mb
    22_loop_null_op : 1.014 sec | 49.32 MOp/s | 15.94 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb
    23_loop_spaceship_op : 0.907 sec | 55.14 MOp/s | 17.82 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb
    26_1_class_public_properties : 0.098 sec | 51.05 MOp/s | 16.50 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb
    26_2_class_getter_setter : 0.338 sec | 14.81 MOp/s | 4.79 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb

    26_3_class_magic_methods : 0.702 sec | 7.12 MOp/s | 2.30 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb

    Total time: : 44.827 sec | 13.44 MOp/s | 4.34 kOps/MHz |
    Current PHP memory usage: : 4 Mb
    Peak PHP memory usage: : 125.47 Mb

    `

    Compiled from DA one IMAP, Ioncube + Imagic + GMP + xmlrpc

    `php bench.php

    | PHP BENCHMARK SCRIPT |

    Start : 2021-01-08 02:14:04
    Server : Linux/4.18.0-147.8.1.el8.lve.1.x86_64 x86_64
    Platform : Linux
    System : Linux
    CPU :
    model : AMD Ryzen 9 3900 12-Core Processor
    cores : 12
    available : 12
    MHz : 3094.186MHz
    Memory : 256 Mb available
    Benchmark version : 1.0.37
    PHP version : 7.4.13
    available modules :
    mbstring : yes
    json : yes
    pcre : yes
    Max execution time : 600 sec

    Crypt hash algo : MD5

    TEST NAME : SECONDS | OP/SEC | OP/SEC/MHz | MEMORY

    01_math : 1.366 sec | 732.00 kOp/s | 236.57 Ops/MHz | 2 Mb
    02_string_concat : 0.207 sec | 37.25 MOp/s | 12.04 kOps/MHz | 128.84 Mb
    03_1_string_number_concat : 0.022 sec | 229.26 MOp/s | 74.10 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb
    03_2_string_number_format : 1.297 sec | 3.85 MOp/s | 1.25 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb
    04_string_simple_functions : 1.254 sec | 1.04 MOp/s | 334.96 Ops/MHz | 4 Mb
    05_string_multibyte : 0.917 sec | 141.81 kOp/s | 45.83 Ops/MHz | 4 Mb
    06_string_manipulation : 2.221 sec | 585.25 kOp/s | 189.14 Ops/MHz | 4 Mb
    07_regex : 1.620 sec | 802.31 kOp/s | 259.30 Ops/MHz | 4 Mb
    08_1_hashing : 2.173 sec | 598.27 kOp/s | 193.35 Ops/MHz | 4 Mb
    08_2_crypt : 7.077 sec | 1.41 kOp/s | 0.46 Ops/MHz | 4 Mb
    09_json_encode : 1.952 sec | 666.13 kOp/s | 215.28 Ops/MHz | 4 Mb
    10_json_decode : 3.338 sec | 389.46 kOp/s | 125.87 Ops/MHz | 4 Mb
    11_serialize : 1.485 sec | 875.43 kOp/s | 282.93 Ops/MHz | 4 Mb
    12_unserialize : 2.108 sec | 616.58 kOp/s | 199.27 Ops/MHz | 4 Mb
    13_array_fill : 1.468 sec | 34.07 MOp/s | 11.01 kOps/MHz | 12 Mb
    14_array_range : 0.321 sec | 311.42 kOp/s | 100.65 Ops/MHz | 12 Mb
    14_array_unset : 1.460 sec | 34.24 MOp/s | 11.07 kOps/MHz | 12 Mb
    15_loops : 0.883 sec | 226.53 MOp/s | 73.21 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb
    16_loop_ifelse : 0.265 sec | 188.61 MOp/s | 60.96 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb
    17_loop_ternary : 0.564 sec | 88.67 MOp/s | 28.66 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb
    18_1_loop_defined_access : 0.243 sec | 82.41 MOp/s | 26.63 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb
    18_2_loop_undefined_access : 2.886 sec | 6.93 MOp/s | 2.24 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb
    19_type_functions : 0.620 sec | 4.84 MOp/s | 1.56 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb
    20_type_conversion : 0.620 sec | 4.84 MOp/s | 1.56 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb
    21_0_loop_exception_none : 0.017 sec | 231.04 MOp/s | 74.67 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb
    21_1_loop_exception_try : 0.037 sec | 107.75 MOp/s | 34.82 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb
    21_2_loop_exception_catch : 1.231 sec | 3.25 MOp/s | 1.05 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb
    22_loop_null_op : 0.674 sec | 74.23 MOp/s | 23.99 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb
    23_loop_spaceship_op : 0.738 sec | 67.73 MOp/s | 21.89 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb
    26_1_class_public_properties : 0.082 sec | 61.03 MOp/s | 19.73 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb
    26_2_class_getter_setter : 0.322 sec | 15.54 MOp/s | 5.02 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb

    26_3_class_magic_methods : 0.680 sec | 7.36 MOp/s | 2.38 kOps/MHz | 4 Mb

    Total time: : 40.147 sec | 15.00 MOp/s | 4.85 kOps/MHz |
    Current PHP memory usage: : 4 Mb
    Peak PHP memory usage: : 125.25 Mb
    `

    My point do you can keep a server with CL8 of the same CPU model where your customers will receive 20% slower service but will got selectable extensions ... Do not push DA in direction where it will loose advantages and most customers do not need

    P.S CL version is older as of the moment of the test no newer binaries are available next day after the benchmark 7.4.14 become available for compiling where CL was still behind

  • UmairUmair Member

    @seriesn said:

    @Umair said:
    Has anyone tried to update to latest release with their provider's internal license??
    I see the section "Nginx Rewrite" enables on user level but it says "nginx template not enabled in your license"

    Seems like Internal licenses (i.e. the one you get from your VPS/Dedi providers) may not be getting pro-pack. Their is no pricing info as of yet. I wish they would make the info public.

    I believe the pro pack is a work in progress and so is the pricing.

    I do hope that this becomes a value added option for dc license :). Maybe with discount, maybe without a discount. But it is definitely a good option to have :).

    Nothing on the Pro Pack so far.
    I want to convert multiple cP VPS licenses to DA but I am stuck with this one. Without ProPack, it makes no sense. (i.e. without Nginx Templates, I don't need anything else out of it) And looks like no Pro Pack for internal licnese. (For Server providers)

    At the same time, cPanel has introduced Nginx proxy as well. And so far in my testing, it's kind of working out of the box. (mainly for the cache part).

    Come on DA .. give some updates.

  • edited June 2021

    @Umair said:
    Nothing on the Pro Pack so far.
    I want to convert multiple cP VPS licenses to DA but I am stuck with this one. Without ProPack, it makes no sense.

    Direct Admin's newest beta has only released a part of the Pro Pack, patience is a virtue. You can't yet purchase what's not yet released. The Pro Pack will work as an addon to your provider's datacenter DA license.

    Correct me if I'm wrong please @DA_Mark

  • JamesFJamesF Member, Host Rep

    So far I read it as you need one of their retail licenses or paying support for your owned one. So at the minute you need to get a license directly from DA for pro pack.

  • UmairUmair Member

    @Offshore_Solutions said:

    @Umair said:
    Nothing on the Pro Pack so far.
    I want to convert multiple cP VPS licenses to DA but I am stuck with this one. Without ProPack, it makes no sense.

    Direct Admin's newest beta has only released a part of the Pro Pack, patience is a virtue. You can't yet purchase what's not yet released. The Pro Pack will work as an addon to your provider's datacenter DA license.

    Correct me if I'm wrong please @DA_Mark

    I get it, probably need to wait for actual release of ProPack. But so far the info they have given, it seems like provider's "Internal License" will not get ProPack and only license received directly from DA. I am saying that because I have few VPS with DA Internal license from provider and with new DA version, The Nginx rewrite URL option gives "Nginx Template is not enabled in your license"

    So I am wondering what it's going to be. I was planning on shifting all my cPanel VPS to DA and have been waiting for it but if it's not included with Internal license, its not going to be cost effecting for me. I only have couple of domains per VPS.

    Also just to be clear, I do not get DA free from my provider. I pay a monthly license fee there as well. (Obviously less than cPanel VPS licnese).

    I have asked DA support as well and so far it seems like Internal licenses are not going to it. I was really looking forward to it.

    Also with cPanel's new Nginx as proxy option (which works out of the box and gives you decent control / info without changing anything) it looks better for site performance. (i.e. compare to cP with Apache only).

    With DA, you do get Nginx stand alone option or use it as proxy but Nginx cache doesn't work out of the box. (Not without error here and there).

  • UmairUmair Member

    @JamesF said:
    So far I read it as you need one of their retail licenses or paying support for your owned one. So at the minute you need to get a license directly from DA for pro pack.

    Yea and this will probably make sense if you have lots of accounts on the server / VPS.
    For people without only hosting few server per server, its going to cost more with DA than cPanel.

    (Lets say you have 5 VPS that you need on different places and each hosting less than 30 accounts).

  • JamesFJamesF Member, Host Rep

    Th retail DA is still cheaper than cPanel. Just get a license direct.

  • edited June 2021

    @JamesF said:
    So far I read it as you need one of their retail licenses or paying support for your owned one. So at the minute you need to get a license directly from DA for pro pack.

    Dear @smtalk or @DA_Mark, please would you be willing to clarify the above question if we can pay the extra to have the pro-pack added to a Direct Admin internal Datacenter license that comes with the server we're renting? Or can the datacenter pay to have it added to that same internal Datacenter license they've assigned to our server?

    (Not free of course but by paying. Wouldn't this be a great way to make internal Datacenter licenses profitable again?)

    Thanked by 1rustelekom
  • DA_MarkDA_Mark Member
    edited June 2021

    There isn't a way to add it to someone else's license. It would be better to cancel the existing license and have your DC provision a retail license instead (which they can get at a discount, albeit not a dramatic one). If it's a legacy lifetime, I suppose they could add a support extension to it as another option (but that requires a yearly payment).

    We're still figuring it out, but so far there two main camps. One wants cheap cheap cheap, and I don't mean it in a condescending way. It's just that group of people who thinks that a paid panel should be a small expense -- not a huge portion of the server cost. DA core is best for this. Almost 20 years later, our revised internal pricing for is even better than the past, in most ways.

    The other camp wants something that can compete with the main panel out there, and they realize we can't take "a few bucks" and match something that people are paying $50-$100+/mo for. I think this group is more likely to find our retail pricing fair, especially when we're adding in the Pro Pack to it at no extra cost.

    All feedback welcome though. It's just tough to find a middle ground for this one.

  • @DA_Mark said:
    There isn't a way to add it to someone else's license. It would be better to cancel the existing license and have your DC provision a retail license instead (which they can get at a discount, albeit not a dramatic one). If it's a legacy lifetime, I suppose they could add a support extension to it as another option (but that requires a yearly payment).

    We're still figuring it out, but so far there two main camps. One wants cheap cheap cheap, and I don't mean it in a condescending way. It's just that group of people who thinks that a paid panel should be a small expense -- not a huge portion of the server cost. DA core is best for this. Almost 20 years later, our revised internal pricing for is even better than the past, in most ways.

    The other camp wants something that can compete with the main panel out there, and they realize we can't take "a few bucks" and match something that people are paying $50-$100+/mo for. I think this group is more likely to find our retail pricing fair, and that we are even adding the Pro Pack to it at no extra cost.

    All feedback welcome though. It's just tough to find a middle ground for this one.

    If my DA license doesn't come with Marks personal cell phone number and Facebook ID, I WANT REFUND!

  • Mahfuz_SS_EHLMahfuz_SS_EHL Host Rep, Veteran

    What's the ETA of releasing the Pro Pack ? @DA_Mark

  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran

    @coolice said: majority of OpenStack Clouds are Ubuntu Based

    CloudStack also loves Ubuntu.

  • DA_MarkDA_Mark Member
    edited June 2021

    @seriesn I'm not talking to you after you suspended my a friend's NexusBytes storage VPS for seedboxing and Chia mining.

    @Mahfuz_SS_EHL it's going to be a continuous development of ongoing features so I can't give any firm dates. We just finished e-mail track & trace (it's in the pre-release). GIT manager is next (#1 upvoted request on feedback.directadmin.com right now). We're moving forward on some other stuff too, but rushing is not an option. We really want this stuff to feel premium. :)

  • Mahfuz_SS_EHLMahfuz_SS_EHL Host Rep, Veteran

    @DA_Mark said:
    @Mahfuz_SS_EHL it's going to be a continuous development of ongoing features so I can't give any firm dates. We just finished e-mail track & trace (it's in the pre-release). GIT manager is next (#1 upvoted request on feedback.directadmin.com right now). We're moving forward on some other stuff too, but rushing is not an option. We really want this stuff to feel premium. :)

    But, do you have any timeline in mind that you'll try to complete it by 2021 or by 2022 ?

Sign In or Register to comment.