benchmark results for three VPS: Nexus, Pacific, Virmach

jpeng

from my test, nexus is far away the best among these three. Pacific the second, who has even better networking than nexus. Virmach is the worse.
Please see the document:
https://1drv.ms/b/s!AlsbmZELhAliukb2w58AssIuG9wm?e=HrAzfz

regards.

aRNoLD

make no sense with different cpu/brand/speed, ram, and etc.

and if not within the same region/isp, port speed, cannot draw a fair conclusion that one is much better than another.

Virmach might be more reliable than PacificRack, and NexusBytes no doubt is the top among the three, even far more beyond the second one.

swat4

@jpeng said:
from my test, nexus is far away the best among these three. Pacific the second, who has even better networking than nexus. Virmach is the worse.
Please see the document:
https://1drv.ms/b/s!AlsbmZELhAliukb2w58AssIuG9wm?e=HrAzfz

regards.

@seriesn

Correct me if I am wrong please - It seems like the subject being tested is a 0.5gb-plan, which port speed has been limited to 1/10 of originally what it should have been. I believe the speedtest result would be way way better if we test with 1gb (or above) plan.

BharatB

Makes no sense comparing Ryzen with Intel.

smallbibi

The geekbench benchmark for nexusbytes' ryzen cpu seems really low too.

Anyway, I'd imagine nexusbytes to be the most expensive among the three so obviously you would expect them to be the best

seriesn

@swat4 said:

@jpeng said:
from my test, nexus is far away the best among these three. Pacific the second, who has even better networking than nexus. Virmach is the worse.
Please see the document:
https://1drv.ms/b/s!AlsbmZELhAliukb2w58AssIuG9wm?e=HrAzfz

regards.

@seriesn

Correct me if I am wrong please - It seems like the subject being tested is a 0.5gb-plan, which port speed has been limited to 1/10 of originally what it should have been. I believe the speedtest result would be way way better if we test with 1gb (or above) plan.

That's correct. Port speed is throttled at 100mbps: https://nexusbytes.com/kvm-vps-hosting.html

@smallbibi said: The geekbench benchmark for nexusbytes' ryzen cpu seems really low too.

Not enough memory to remember the number

@jpeng said:
from my test, nexus is far away the best among these three. Pacific the second, who has even better networking than nexus. Virmach is the worse.
Please see the document:
https://1drv.ms/b/s!AlsbmZELhAliukb2w58AssIuG9wm?e=HrAzfz

regards.

Thanks for the benches my friend . Appreciate it

Please note the 0.5G plan is capped as @swat4 mentioned. Which would explain the lower throughput. Geekbench performs much better when there's enough memory for the system.

I really don't recall which location you are in, but since you mentioned P.R, I did a quick network bench from for LA (Similar location). Please note, nodes are connected over 10Gbps .

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                |                           |                 |
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 919 Mbits/sec   | 1.26 Gbits/sec
Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 944 Mbits/sec   | 986 Mbits/sec
WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 514 Mbits/sec   | 740 Mbits/sec
Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 547 Mbits/sec   | 299 Mbits/sec
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.42 Gbits/sec  | 2.84 Gbits/sec
Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 1.66 Gbits/sec  | 2.86 Gbits/sec
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 8.85 Gbits/sec  | 8.63 Gbits/sec
Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | 98.1 Mbits/sec  | 1.02 Gbits/sec

webmasteroffers

Bookmarked nexusbytes for future order

Good CPU, good Network, good price. I have to pay $12 for Vultr 1CPU, 2GB Ram, 64 NVMe space . Cancel Vultr very soon

@seriesn
Can you put the CPU test result with enough memory?

seriesn

@webmasteroffers said:
Bookmarked nexusbytes for future order

Good CPU, good Network, good price. I have to pay $12 for Vultr 1CPU, 2GB Ram, 64 NVMe space . Cancel Vultr very soon

@seriesn
Can you put the CPU test result with enough memory?

Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 5305
Multi Core      | 5192
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/15949580

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 1218
Multi Core      | 1191
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/5442843

swat4

@seriesn said:

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:

Test | Value
|
Single Core | 1218
Multi Core | 1191
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/5442843
```

If I have to compare it to a car, must be Carrera GT

jpeng

@swat4 said:

@seriesn said:

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:

Test | Value
|
Single Core | 1218
Multi Core | 1191
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/5442843
```

If I have to compare it to a car, must be Carrera GT

In real life I am driving Maserati SUV

swat4

@jpeng said:

In real life I am driving Maserati SUV

Good for you man! I could only afford a Nissan

aRNoLD

both of you mega drivers. I'm with my ten yr's bike.

swat4

@aRNoLD said:
both of you mega drivers. I'm with my ten yr's bike.

I am sure many bikes indeed have a higher value than my old wheels

Cars here (especially used one) have piss poor value because of the prohibitive parking cost and other associated fees here