Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


[MaxKVM] Network Updates with Christmas and New Year Offers (2020)! - Page 5
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

[MaxKVM] Network Updates with Christmas and New Year Offers (2020)!

1235721

Comments

  • @MaxKVM said:

    @AC_Fan said:
    Rage4 is probably your best bet. 20 eur per month for an average response of sub-25ms.

    Any chance Prometeus is still offering Rage4 for free with service? :p

    I don't believe so. ClouDNS is slightly worse, performance wise, but starts at 10 dollars. Also, for low amount of queries, AWS Route53 might be a decent option.

    Thanked by 1MaxKVM
  • jon617jon617 Veteran
    edited December 2020

    @MaxKVM said: Which DNS provider with Anycast with GeoIP/DNS is inexpensive and recommended? We can also migrate PowerDNS to an Anycast service.

    I have been using AWS Route53 for geodns, cheap with low volume ($0.70/million geodns requests/month). Gets pricey when adding failover monitoring, $2.75/mo for https monitoring of each host, so your 8 geo-distanced hosts alone would be $22/mo for monitoring+failover, but that is optional.

    Thanked by 1MaxKVM
  • redgreenblueredgreenblue Member
    edited December 2020

    @MaxKVM, a few points:

    • You probably do not need all 8 instances. 3 instances (eg: New York, Amsterdam, Singapore) should suffice
    • Use AWS Route53 with a separate subdomain hosted at R53, eg: r53.maxkvm.com, and have a record set which will handle latency based traffic direction, eg: inbound.r53.maxkvm.com.
    • CNAME www.maxkvm.com to inbound.r53.maxkvm.com
    • With this scheme, you can self-host your top level maxkvm.com zone
    • You should be able to live with just HTTP checks (as opposed to HTTPS), if you are confident that your HTTP -> HTTPS redirection would work fine, and your HTTPS service would work fine if your HTTP service works fine.
    • This would cut your monitoring cost down to just USD 2.25 (3 x 0.75), if using IPv4 only, and USD 4.50 (6 x 0.75) if using both IPv4 and IPv6.
    Thanked by 3MaxKVM bdl atomi
  • MaxKVMMaxKVM Member, Host Rep

    @redgreenblue said:
    @MaxKVM, a few points:

    • You probably do not need all 8 instances. 3 instances (eg: New York, Amsterdam, Singapore) should suffice
    • Use AWS Route53 with a separate subdomain hosted at R53, eg: r53.maxkvm.com, and have a record set which will handle latency based traffic direction, eg: inbound.r53.maxkvm.com.
    • CNAME www.maxkvm.com to inbound.r53.maxkvm.com
    • With this scheme, you can self-host your top level maxkvm.com zone
    • You should be able to live with just HTTP checks (as opposed to HTTPS), if you are confident that your HTTP -> HTTPS redirection would work fine, and your HTTPS service would work fine if your HTTP service works fine.
    • This would cut your monitoring cost down to just USD 2.25 (3 x 0.75), if using IPv4 only, and USD 4.50 (6 x 0.75) if using both IPv4 and IPv6.

    Not bad at all. This why I love these forums.

    We currently have our PowerDNS on BuyVM Anycast but will try this out too. Thanks! B)

  • @MaxKVM I see that you have all your DNS servers on BuyVM's network. This is perhaps not the best, considering resilience. You probably want to consider hosting DNS on multiple different AS.

    Acknowledging that the scheme that I mentioned above would also have a SPOF at R53, in the event that R53 goes down (however unlikely), assuming you handle TTL and SOA record properly, you can immediately direct back to your own servers. You can even just change the www.maxkvm.com CNAME to point to a non-R53 record.

  • MaxKVMMaxKVM Member, Host Rep

    @redgreenblue said: I see that you have all your DNS servers on BuyVM's network. This is perhaps not the best, considering resilience. You probably want to consider hosting DNS on multiple different AS.

    Yes, this is very clear - but thanks for making sure we know. As stated:

    We currently have our PowerDNS on BuyVM Anycast but will try this out too. Thanks!

    SPoF is not too much of a concern for the main website, but it can be important for resolving anything else on our network. If the Frantech Empire or (the smaller and weaker) AWS cloud go offline then we are probably offline as well anyway. This can be handled with the single CNAME for the www as you mentioned. Thanks again.

  • FrankZFrankZ Veteran
    edited December 2020

    I have been using gDNSd 2.4 with geodns and auto failover from 8 locations for a few years. It has worked great. According to hetrixtools I show a 99.999% uptime on websites, even though the underling web servers are 98+% to 99.8% up. I made a simple panel to manage all the dns servers from one location for easy admin. I would be happy to point a domain at your locations for you to test. if you wish to discuss further PM me.

    @aRNoLD said: or recurring annual $39.50

    MaxKVM seems to have fixed this, shows $72 a year now, too bad.

  • MaxKVMMaxKVM Member, Host Rep

    @FrankZ said: MaxKVM seems to have fixed this, shows $72 a year now, too bad.

    The double annual discount was intended this morning but yes, that sale is finished now. :)

    Thanked by 1FrankZ
  • @FrankZ said:
    I have been using gDNSd 2.4 with geodns and auto failover from 8 locations for a few years. It has worked great. According to hetrixtools I show a 99.999% uptime on websites, even though the underling web servers are 98+% to 99.8% up. I made a simple panel to manage all the dns servers from one location for easy admin. I would be happy to point a domain at your locations for you to test. if you wish to discuss further PM me.

    @aRNoLD said: or recurring annual $39.50

    MaxKVM seems to have fixed this, shows $72 a year now, too bad.

    MaxKVM retains 70% discount coupon to be released in some day before Jan., my guess.

  • @aRNoLD said:

    @FrankZ said:
    I have been using gDNSd 2.4 with geodns and auto failover from 8 locations for a few years. It has worked great. According to hetrixtools I show a 99.999% uptime on websites, even though the underling web servers are 98+% to 99.8% up. I made a simple panel to manage all the dns servers from one location for easy admin. I would be happy to point a domain at your locations for you to test. if you wish to discuss further PM me.

    @aRNoLD said: or recurring annual $39.50

    MaxKVM seems to have fixed this, shows $72 a year now, too bad.

    MaxKVM retains 70% discount coupon to be released in some day before Jan., my guess.

    Hope so, I am waiting to catch that deal :)

  • @webmasteroffers said:

    Hope so, I am waiting to catch that deal :)

    I've already grabbed SKVM-4G, not sure if I can grab another magic deal, but this one is cool enough.

  • @aRNoLD said:

    @webmasteroffers said:

    Hope so, I am waiting to catch that deal :)

    I've already grabbed SKVM-4G, not sure if I can grab another magic deal, but this one is cool enough.

    Damn...
    I'm too hype with my new SKVM-4G-4CPU and didn't know that MaxKVM offers SKVM-4G for $39.50/year :open_mouth:

  • @DianTama said:

    @aRNoLD said:

    @webmasteroffers said:

    Hope so, I am waiting to catch that deal :)

    I've already grabbed SKVM-4G, not sure if I can grab another magic deal, but this one is cool enough.

    Damn...
    I'm too hype with my new SKVM-4G-4CPU and didn't know that MaxKVM offers SKVM-4G for $39.50/year :open_mouth:

    so you paid $69 for 4c4g and envy my 2c4g, same hardisk same bandwidth for $39?

    there will be plenty to order with 70% if you are patient till Jan 1.

    Honestly, 2 cores of AMD EPYC and Singapore location are your unique feature.

  • @aRNoLD said:

    @DianTama said:

    @aRNoLD said:

    @webmasteroffers said:

    Hope so, I am waiting to catch that deal :)

    I've already grabbed SKVM-4G, not sure if I can grab another magic deal, but this one is cool enough.

    Damn...
    I'm too hype with my new SKVM-4G-4CPU and didn't know that MaxKVM offers SKVM-4G for $39.50/year :open_mouth:

    so you paid $69 for 4c4g and envy my 2c4g, same hardisk same bandwidth for $39?

    there will be plenty to order with 70% if you are patient till Jan 1.

    Honestly, 2 cores of AMD EPYC and Singapore location are your unique feature.

    Oh, I thought its SG.
    But your offer is better tho if you add + 2core ( $3 )

    It's ~$0.7 cheaper than mine hehe ✌

  • Looks like things are going wrong, website is down :(.

    d1 [~]# nslookup maxkvm.com
    Server: 8.8.8.8
    Address: 8.8.8.8:53

    ** server can't find maxkvm.com: SERVFAIL

    ** server can't find maxkvm.com: SERVFAIL

    Thanked by 1MaxKVM
  • @o_be_one said:
    Looks like things are going wrong, website is down :(.

    d1 [~]# nslookup maxkvm.com
    Server: 8.8.8.8
    Address: 8.8.8.8:53

    ** server can't find maxkvm.com: SERVFAIL

    ** server can't find maxkvm.com: SERVFAIL

    It's up, atleast for me now.

  • redgreenblueredgreenblue Member
    edited December 2020
    root@s:~# dig @9.9.9.9 maxkvm.com
    
    ; <<>> DiG 9.11.5-P4-5.1+deb10u2-Debian <<>> @9.9.9.9 maxkvm.com
    ; (1 server found)
    ;; global options: +cmd
    ;; Got answer:
    ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 15948
    ;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
    
    ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
    ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
    ;; QUESTION SECTION:
    ;maxkvm.com.            IN  A
    
    ;; ANSWER SECTION:
    maxkvm.com.     3600    IN  A   23.29.127.5
    
    ;; Query time: 53 msec
    ;; SERVER: 9.9.9.9#53(9.9.9.9)
    ;; WHEN: Wed Dec 23 04:20:27 UTC 2020
    ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 55
    
    root@s:~# dig @1.1.1.1 maxkvm.com
    
    ; <<>> DiG 9.11.5-P4-5.1+deb10u2-Debian <<>> @1.1.1.1 maxkvm.com
    ; (1 server found)
    ;; global options: +cmd
    ;; Got answer:
    ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 63054
    ;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
    
    ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
    ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1232
    ;; QUESTION SECTION:
    ;maxkvm.com.            IN  A
    
    ;; ANSWER SECTION:
    maxkvm.com.     3600    IN  A   194.126.173.150
    
    ;; Query time: 327 msec
    ;; SERVER: 1.1.1.1#53(1.1.1.1)
    ;; WHEN: Wed Dec 23 04:20:38 UTC 2020
    ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 55
    
    root@s:~# dig @8.8.8.8 maxkvm.com
    
    ; <<>> DiG 9.11.5-P4-5.1+deb10u2-Debian <<>> @8.8.8.8 maxkvm.com
    ; (1 server found)
    ;; global options: +cmd
    ;; Got answer:
    ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 49740
    ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
    
    ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
    ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
    ;; QUESTION SECTION:
    ;maxkvm.com.            IN  A
    
    ;; Query time: 439 msec
    ;; SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8)
    ;; WHEN: Wed Dec 23 04:20:47 UTC 2020
    ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 39
    
    root@s:~# dig @9.9.9.11 maxkvm.com
    
    ; <<>> DiG 9.11.5-P4-5.1+deb10u2-Debian <<>> @9.9.9.11 maxkvm.com
    ; (1 server found)
    ;; global options: +cmd
    ;; Got answer:
    ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 56858
    ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
    
    ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
    ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1232
    ; COOKIE: 6796357bd1a145e1f9c46d235fe2c6ccf88ba2e414389975 (good)
    ;; QUESTION SECTION:
    ;maxkvm.com.            IN  A
    
    ;; Query time: 80 msec
    ;; SERVER: 9.9.9.11#53(9.9.9.11)
    ;; WHEN: Wed Dec 23 04:25:48 UTC 2020
    ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 67
    
    root@s:~# 
    
    
  • @redgreenblue said:

    root@s:~# dig @9.9.9.9 maxkvm.com
    
    ; <<>> DiG 9.11.5-P4-5.1+deb10u2-Debian <<>> @9.9.9.9 maxkvm.com
    ; (1 server found)
    ;; global options: +cmd
    ;; Got answer:
    ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 15948
    ;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
    
    ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
    ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
    ;; QUESTION SECTION:
    ;maxkvm.com.          IN  A
    
    ;; ANSWER SECTION:
    maxkvm.com.       3600    IN  A   23.29.127.5
    
    ;; Query time: 53 msec
    ;; SERVER: 9.9.9.9#53(9.9.9.9)
    ;; WHEN: Wed Dec 23 04:20:27 UTC 2020
    ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 55
    
    root@s:~# dig @1.1.1.1 maxkvm.com
    
    ; <<>> DiG 9.11.5-P4-5.1+deb10u2-Debian <<>> @1.1.1.1 maxkvm.com
    ; (1 server found)
    ;; global options: +cmd
    ;; Got answer:
    ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 63054
    ;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
    
    ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
    ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1232
    ;; QUESTION SECTION:
    ;maxkvm.com.          IN  A
    
    ;; ANSWER SECTION:
    maxkvm.com.       3600    IN  A   194.126.173.150
    
    ;; Query time: 327 msec
    ;; SERVER: 1.1.1.1#53(1.1.1.1)
    ;; WHEN: Wed Dec 23 04:20:38 UTC 2020
    ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 55
    
    root@s:~# dig @8.8.8.8 maxkvm.com
    
    ; <<>> DiG 9.11.5-P4-5.1+deb10u2-Debian <<>> @8.8.8.8 maxkvm.com
    ; (1 server found)
    ;; global options: +cmd
    ;; Got answer:
    ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 49740
    ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
    
    ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
    ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
    ;; QUESTION SECTION:
    ;maxkvm.com.          IN  A
    
    ;; Query time: 439 msec
    ;; SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8)
    ;; WHEN: Wed Dec 23 04:20:47 UTC 2020
    ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 39
    
    root@s:~# 
    

    Thanks, that's really weird it doesn't answer to Google DNS :o. I've tried locally and on few remotes.

  • There could be a variety of reasons why it may have failed for Google DNS. But it is also rather curious that it worked for 9.9.9.9 (without EDNS0 support) but failed for 9.9.9.11 (with EDNS0 support). Also rather curious that with 208.67.220.220 (with EDNS0 support) and 9.9.9.9, traffic is sent to New York, while with 1.1.1.1 (without EDNS0 support), traffic is sent to Amsterdam. The lookup is from a machine in Europe.

    root@s:~# dig @208.67.220.220 maxkvm.com
    
    ; <<>> DiG 9.11.5-P4-5.1+deb10u2-Debian <<>> @208.67.220.220 maxkvm.com
    ; (1 server found)
    ;; global options: +cmd
    ;; Got answer:
    ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 55946
    ;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
    
    ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
    ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
    ;; QUESTION SECTION:
    ;maxkvm.com.            IN  A
    
    ;; ANSWER SECTION:
    maxkvm.com.     3600    IN  A   23.29.127.5
    
    ;; Query time: 130 msec
    ;; SERVER: 208.67.220.220#53(208.67.220.220)
    ;; WHEN: Wed Dec 23 04:31:40 UTC 2020
    ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 55
    
    root@s:~# 
    
    Thanked by 2o_be_one MaxKVM
  • This is from local unbound. So it would seem that the DNS server is not directing traffic to the closest endpoint.

    root@s:~# dig @127.0.0.1 maxkvm.com
    
    ; <<>> DiG 9.11.5-P4-5.1+deb10u2-Debian <<>> @127.0.0.1 maxkvm.com
    ; (1 server found)
    ;; global options: +cmd
    ;; Got answer:
    ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 25287
    ;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
    
    ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
    ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
    ;; QUESTION SECTION:
    ;maxkvm.com.            IN  A
    
    ;; ANSWER SECTION:
    maxkvm.com.     3600    IN  A   23.29.127.5
    
    ;; Query time: 199 msec
    ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1)
    ;; WHEN: Wed Dec 23 04:36:54 UTC 2020
    ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 55
    
    root@s:~# 
    
    Thanked by 1o_be_one
  • Aha, looks like not all the instances are behaving the same way:

    root@s:~# dig @ns1.maxkvm.net maxkvm.com
    
    ; <<>> DiG 9.11.5-P4-5.1+deb10u2-Debian <<>> @ns1.maxkvm.net maxkvm.com
    ; (1 server found)
    ;; global options: +cmd
    ;; Got answer:
    ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 37272
    ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
    ;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available
    
    ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
    ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1232
    ;; QUESTION SECTION:
    ;maxkvm.com.            IN  A
    
    ;; ANSWER SECTION:
    maxkvm.com.     3600    IN  A   194.126.173.150
    
    ;; Query time: 31 msec
    ;; SERVER: 198.251.86.122#53(198.251.86.122)
    ;; WHEN: Wed Dec 23 04:40:22 UTC 2020
    ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 55
    
    root@s:~# dig @ns2.maxkvm.net maxkvm.com
    
    ; <<>> DiG 9.11.5-P4-5.1+deb10u2-Debian <<>> @ns2.maxkvm.net maxkvm.com
    ; (1 server found)
    ;; global options: +cmd
    ;; Got answer:
    ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 30348
    ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
    ;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available
    
    ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
    ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1232
    ;; QUESTION SECTION:
    ;maxkvm.com.            IN  A
    
    ;; ANSWER SECTION:
    maxkvm.com.     3600    IN  A   23.29.127.5
    
    ;; Query time: 30 msec
    ;; SERVER: 198.251.86.123#53(198.251.86.123)
    ;; WHEN: Wed Dec 23 04:40:34 UTC 2020
    ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 55
    
    root@s:~# dig @ns3.maxkvm.net maxkvm.com
    
    ; <<>> DiG 9.11.5-P4-5.1+deb10u2-Debian <<>> @ns3.maxkvm.net maxkvm.com
    ; (1 server found)
    ;; global options: +cmd
    ;; Got answer:
    ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 63730
    ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
    ;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available
    
    ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
    ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1232
    ;; QUESTION SECTION:
    ;maxkvm.com.            IN  A
    
    ;; ANSWER SECTION:
    maxkvm.com.     3600    IN  A   23.29.127.5
    
    ;; Query time: 30 msec
    ;; SERVER: 198.251.86.124#53(198.251.86.124)
    ;; WHEN: Wed Dec 23 04:40:40 UTC 2020
    ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 55
    
    root@s:~# 
    
    Thanked by 1o_be_one
  • aRNoLDaRNoLD Member
    edited December 2020

    For someone who wants to get a bigger discount, today's code 12-23-2020 would be unprecedented, 65% on PKVM-6G, which originally $18/month w/o code, and now (with the code for today ONLY) $75.60 annually (you'll pay $70.85 actually if placing the order for one machine today).

    PKVM-8G seems workable on this. Or maybe even bigger discount for the next coming two days.

    Update
    On PKVM-8G plan, it becomes 53.67% Recurring Discount, and produces a $130+ annual bill, relatively a small portion as compared to today's promo code, so if you wanna bigger memory, wait or maybe manually add a 2G add-on from the client area/panel with $3/month.

    Thanked by 2MaxKVM ferri
  • DPDP Administrator, The Domain Guy

    @aRNoLD said:
    For someone who wants to get a bigger discount, today's code 12-23-2020 would be unprecedented, 65% on PKVM-6G, which originally $18/month w/o code, and now (with the code for today ONLY) $75.60 annually (you'll pay $70.85 actually if placing the order for one machine today).

    PKVM-8G seems workable on this. Or maybe even bigger discount for the next coming two days.

    Oh, I thought those codes were only applicable to the SKVM products.

  • 12-23-2020
    PKVM-6G
    65% Recurring Discount
    $75.60 USD / Year or
    $6.30 USD / Month

    That's really a nice offer!

    Thanked by 1MaxKVM
  • @thedp said:

    @aRNoLD said:
    For someone who wants to get a bigger discount, today's code 12-23-2020 would be unprecedented, 65% on PKVM-6G, which originally $18/month w/o code, and now (with the code for today ONLY) $75.60 annually (you'll pay $70.85 actually if placing the order for one machine today).

    PKVM-8G seems workable on this. Or maybe even bigger discount for the next coming two days.

    Oh, I thought those codes were only applicable to the SKVM products.

    No. MaxKVM's promo page posted at the first page displays three main plans, the 2nd of which, in the middle is P series. I remember someone's interested in P series. Just cannot find the exact post here.

    Thanked by 1DP
  • DPDP Administrator, The Domain Guy

    @aRNoLD said:

    @thedp said:

    @aRNoLD said:
    For someone who wants to get a bigger discount, today's code 12-23-2020 would be unprecedented, 65% on PKVM-6G, which originally $18/month w/o code, and now (with the code for today ONLY) $75.60 annually (you'll pay $70.85 actually if placing the order for one machine today).

    PKVM-8G seems workable on this. Or maybe even bigger discount for the next coming two days.

    Oh, I thought those codes were only applicable to the SKVM products.

    No. MaxKVM's promo page posted at the first page displays three main plans, the 2nd of which, in the middle is P series. I remember someone's interested in P series. Just cannot find the exact post here.

    The Christmas/NY code doesn't work for PKVM-8G though.

    The PKVM-8G is already on promotion, with code ANNUAL8G.

    Thanked by 1MaxKVM
  • @thedp said:

    @aRNoLD said:

    @thedp said:

    @aRNoLD said:
    For someone who wants to get a bigger discount, today's code 12-23-2020 would be unprecedented, 65% on PKVM-6G, which originally $18/month w/o code, and now (with the code for today ONLY) $75.60 annually (you'll pay $70.85 actually if placing the order for one machine today).

    PKVM-8G seems workable on this. Or maybe even bigger discount for the next coming two days.

    Oh, I thought those codes were only applicable to the SKVM products.

    No. MaxKVM's promo page posted at the first page displays three main plans, the 2nd of which, in the middle is P series. I remember someone's interested in P series. Just cannot find the exact post here.

    The Christmas/NY code doesn't work for PKVM-8G though.

    The PKVM-8G is already on promotion, with code ANNUAL8G.

    Actually I think it's workable. Just not in that scale.

    r6aSjP.png

    Thanked by 1DP
  • @aRNoLD said: Actually I think it's workable. Just not in that scale.

    That's with the ANNUAL8G coupon. The order link came with the coupon, so it applied that coupon over the 12-23 coupon.

  • @smallbibi said:

    @aRNoLD said: Actually I think it's workable. Just not in that scale.

    That's with the ANNUAL8G coupon. The order link came with the coupon, so it applied that coupon over the 12-23 coupon.

    Oh, I see. @thedp @smallbibi
    Then perhaps PKVM-8G will make its show tomorrow or the day after that.

  • @Xiaoming said:
    12-23-2020
    PKVM-6G
    65% Recurring Discount
    $75.60 USD / Year or
    $6.30 USD / Month

    That's really a nice offer!

    This was a really nice deal tho,
    I wish this has a Singapore location xD

Sign In or Register to comment.