Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Crazy Deals on Storage , SSD and hosting with SPICY GIVEAWAY This Black Friday from ServaRICA - Page 6
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Crazy Deals on Storage , SSD and hosting with SPICY GIVEAWAY This Black Friday from ServaRICA

13468915

Comments

  • Order Id #5524371080
    thanks

  • @darb said:
    Purchased FF SSD!

    WTH is order number?

    Invoice #50372

    can you share benchmarks here

  • Order #3100916129

    Awesome deal!

  • Got Flying Fish and Polar Bear
    Order #8888036770
    Order #4750970672

  • @rsix said:
    storage are gone ... :/

    Like my dignity

  • Hi.

    Decided to finally test the storage server I bought yesterday. It seems like I/O on the server I am on is grinding to a halt. The yabs test is stuck at "Generating fio test file..." since last 15 minutes with constant 85-99.9% io wait.

    Can any of you who bought the Polar Bear Storage Offer please perform a yabs on their server at this time?

    A simple dd write test returned 2.6 MB/s for me.

    Thanked by 1sportingdan
  • sportingdansportingdan Member
    edited November 2020

    @akb said:
    Hi.

    Decided to finally test the storage server I bought yesterday. It seems like I/O on the server I am on is grinding to a halt. The yabs test is stuck at "Generating fio test file..." since last 15 minutes with constant 85-99.9% io wait.

    Can any of you who bought the Polar Bear Storage Offer please perform a yabs on their server at this time?

    A simple dd write test returned 2.6 MB/s for me.

    it's not just you. the I/O performance has been miserable for the past 36 hours. the only explanation is that people are torrenting out of these storage VPS. I'm seriously pondering about asking for a refund if the situation does not improve until Monday.

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2020-11-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    lör 28 nov 2020 14:09:42 EST
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2593.624 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 1.9 GiB
    Disk       : 1.9 TiB
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 18.78 MB/s    (4.6k) | 67.66 MB/s    (1.0k)
    Write      | 18.79 MB/s    (4.6k) | 68.03 MB/s    (1.0k)
    Total      | 37.58 MB/s    (9.3k) | 135.69 MB/s   (2.1k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 26.60 MB/s      (51) | 10.50 MB/s      (10)
    Write      | 28.45 MB/s      (55) | 11.72 MB/s      (11)
    Total      | 55.05 MB/s     (106) | 22.23 MB/s      (21)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed     
                    |                           |                 |                
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 948 Mbits/sec   | 931 Mbits/sec  
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 929 Mbits/sec   | 925 Mbits/sec  
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 943 Mbits/sec   | 927 Mbits/sec  
    Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 492 Mbits/sec   | 32.3 Mbits/sec 
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 974 Mbits/sec  
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 972 Mbits/sec   | 959 Mbits/sec  
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 909 Mbits/sec   | 943 Mbits/sec  
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 488                           
    Multi Core      | 929                           
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/5048180`
    
    Thanked by 1akb
  • Noticed no such dramatic io issue on my storage server. Overcrowded machine?

  • @Shot2 said: Overcrowded machine

    people are overyabbing

  • People are stupid, too

  • @Shot2 said: Noticed no such dramatic io issue on my storage server. Overcrowded machine?

    @seenu said: people are overyabbing

    only @servarica_hani can tell :) I thought it might be a temp issue of a few people running benchmarking scripts simultaneously but its been like this since yesterday as @sportingdan pointed out. I couldn't even run & complete yabs the 2 times I tried. Had to settle with writing a 256MB file using dd to get some idea about how low i/o is. Will wait for another day or two before putting in a ticket. It might not be the case of "overyabbing" as the other benchmark results posted in this thread reflect normal & acceptable performances. The server I am on has been like this since yesterday.

    Thanked by 1sportingdan
  • @seenu said:

    @Shot2 said: Overcrowded machine

    people are overyabbing

    Yabbadabbado!

  • @akb @sportingdan if you decide to get rid of your Polar Bears please let me know

    Thanked by 1sportingdan
  • I am also facing same issue. I ran yabs yesterday and disk performance was very poor so haven't done anything on server yet. I will try and see after Monday and see how things go.

    Thanked by 1sportingdan
  • Reply from Servarica support staff.

    'It is NAS storage with multiple SAS disks in raidz2 configuration.

    As the storage plans are not based on SSD disks, the performance will be less when compared to general SSD speeds.'

    Already req to refund. And approved by billing staff.

    Thanked by 2sportingdan Shot2
  • well, it seems @servarica_hani acted on our complaints:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2020-11-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    lör 28 nov 2020 17:47:55 EST
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2593.624 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 1.9 GiB
    Disk       : 1.9 TiB
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 22.74 MB/s    (5.6k) | 149.06 MB/s   (2.3k)
    Write      | 22.75 MB/s    (5.6k) | 149.84 MB/s   (2.3k)
    Total      | 45.49 MB/s   (11.3k) | 298.90 MB/s   (4.6k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 157.20 MB/s    (307) | 158.67 MB/s    (154)
    Write      | 165.55 MB/s    (323) | 169.23 MB/s    (165)
    Total      | 322.76 MB/s    (630) | 327.90 MB/s    (319)
    
  • still slow here :(

  • sportingdansportingdan Member
    edited November 2020

    @Falzo said:
    still slow here :(

    F

  • @Sgrocks said:
    Got Flying Fish and Polar Bear
    Order #8888036770
    Order #4750970672

    can you share benchmarks Flaying fish here

  • @sportingdan said:

    @akb said:
    Hi.

    Decided to finally test the storage server I bought yesterday. It seems like I/O on the server I am on is grinding to a halt. The yabs test is stuck at "Generating fio test file..." since last 15 minutes with constant 85-99.9% io wait.

    Can any of you who bought the Polar Bear Storage Offer please perform a yabs on their server at this time?

    A simple dd write test returned 2.6 MB/s for me.

    it's not just you. the I/O performance has been miserable for the past 36 hours. the only explanation is that people are torrenting out of these storage VPS. I'm seriously pondering about asking for a refund if the situation does not improve until Monday.

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2020-11-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    lör 28 nov 2020 14:09:42 EST
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2593.624 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 1.9 GiB
    Disk       : 1.9 TiB
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 18.78 MB/s    (4.6k) | 67.66 MB/s    (1.0k)
    Write      | 18.79 MB/s    (4.6k) | 68.03 MB/s    (1.0k)
    Total      | 37.58 MB/s    (9.3k) | 135.69 MB/s   (2.1k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 26.60 MB/s      (51) | 10.50 MB/s      (10)
    Write      | 28.45 MB/s      (55) | 11.72 MB/s      (11)
    Total      | 55.05 MB/s     (106) | 22.23 MB/s      (21)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed     
                    |                           |                 |                
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 948 Mbits/sec   | 931 Mbits/sec  
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 929 Mbits/sec   | 925 Mbits/sec  
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 943 Mbits/sec   | 927 Mbits/sec  
    Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 492 Mbits/sec   | 32.3 Mbits/sec 
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 974 Mbits/sec  
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 972 Mbits/sec   | 959 Mbits/sec  
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 909 Mbits/sec   | 943 Mbits/sec  
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 488                           
    Multi Core      | 929                           
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/5048180`
    

    It's a storage box. It's not expected to have SSD speeds, it just needs to exceed the network speed between you and the box for you to get all the performance you'd get.

    And yes, it's because it's getting benchmarked to death and many servers provisioned. It'll be better on Tuesday.

  • @bugis said:

    @Sgrocks said:
    Got Flying Fish and Polar Bear
    Order #8888036770
    Order #4750970672

    can you share benchmarks Flaying fish here

    using it as windows vps :D

    Thanked by 1bugis
  • @netfliq said:
    Already req to refund.

    What a shame we could arrange a transfer instead. Will be waiting for more stock then.

  • Its just probably a lot of people uploading data, give it some time.

  • XEN or KVM?

  • @fensuiji said:
    XEN or KVM?

    XEN HVM. For the end user its like KVM only.

  • Ah i missed out as usual

  • but the watchlist and notifications is a nice feature

  • sportingdansportingdan Member
    edited November 2020

    @TimboJones said:

    @sportingdan said:

    @akb said:
    Hi.

    Decided to finally test the storage server I bought yesterday. It seems like I/O on the server I am on is grinding to a halt. The yabs test is stuck at "Generating fio test file..." since last 15 minutes with constant 85-99.9% io wait.

    Can any of you who bought the Polar Bear Storage Offer please perform a yabs on their server at this time?

    A simple dd write test returned 2.6 MB/s for me.

    it's not just you. the I/O performance has been miserable for the past 36 hours. the only explanation is that people are torrenting out of these storage VPS. I'm seriously pondering about asking for a refund if the situation does not improve until Monday.

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2020-11-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    lör 28 nov 2020 14:09:42 EST
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2593.624 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 1.9 GiB
    Disk       : 1.9 TiB
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 18.78 MB/s    (4.6k) | 67.66 MB/s    (1.0k)
    Write      | 18.79 MB/s    (4.6k) | 68.03 MB/s    (1.0k)
    Total      | 37.58 MB/s    (9.3k) | 135.69 MB/s   (2.1k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 26.60 MB/s      (51) | 10.50 MB/s      (10)
    Write      | 28.45 MB/s      (55) | 11.72 MB/s      (11)
    Total      | 55.05 MB/s     (106) | 22.23 MB/s      (21)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed     
                    |                           |                 |                
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 948 Mbits/sec   | 931 Mbits/sec  
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 929 Mbits/sec   | 925 Mbits/sec  
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 943 Mbits/sec   | 927 Mbits/sec  
    Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 492 Mbits/sec   | 32.3 Mbits/sec 
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 974 Mbits/sec  
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 972 Mbits/sec   | 959 Mbits/sec  
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 909 Mbits/sec   | 943 Mbits/sec  
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 488                           
    Multi Core      | 929                           
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/5048180`
    

    It's a storage box. It's not expected to have SSD speeds, it just needs to exceed the network speed between you and the box for you to get all the performance you'd get.

    And yes, it's because it's getting benchmarked to death and many servers provisioned. It'll be better on Tuesday.

    when and where did you see me asking for SSD speeds? I just think that a 3-5 MB/s transfer speed is verging on the unacceptable and if this is the sort of performance they will deliver on a permanent basis, then I'd most likely rather spend my money elsewhere.

    in any case, I'm going to give @servarica_hani the benefit of the doubt until we get a reply. perhaps something went wrong or a few people are abusing the service. I like Québec and the fact the data center is mostly powered using green energy. I want this to work :smile:

    Thanked by 2Falzo nulldev
  • looking for 1tb storage vps, do you plan to add one?

  • @sportingdan said:

    @TimboJones said:

    @sportingdan said:

    @akb said:
    Hi.

    Decided to finally test the storage server I bought yesterday. It seems like I/O on the server I am on is grinding to a halt. The yabs test is stuck at "Generating fio test file..." since last 15 minutes with constant 85-99.9% io wait.

    Can any of you who bought the Polar Bear Storage Offer please perform a yabs on their server at this time?

    A simple dd write test returned 2.6 MB/s for me.

    it's not just you. the I/O performance has been miserable for the past 36 hours. the only explanation is that people are torrenting out of these storage VPS. I'm seriously pondering about asking for a refund if the situation does not improve until Monday.

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2020-11-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    lör 28 nov 2020 14:09:42 EST
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2593.624 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 1.9 GiB
    Disk       : 1.9 TiB
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 18.78 MB/s    (4.6k) | 67.66 MB/s    (1.0k)
    Write      | 18.79 MB/s    (4.6k) | 68.03 MB/s    (1.0k)
    Total      | 37.58 MB/s    (9.3k) | 135.69 MB/s   (2.1k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 26.60 MB/s      (51) | 10.50 MB/s      (10)
    Write      | 28.45 MB/s      (55) | 11.72 MB/s      (11)
    Total      | 55.05 MB/s     (106) | 22.23 MB/s      (21)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed     
                    |                           |                 |                
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 948 Mbits/sec   | 931 Mbits/sec  
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 929 Mbits/sec   | 925 Mbits/sec  
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 943 Mbits/sec   | 927 Mbits/sec  
    Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 492 Mbits/sec   | 32.3 Mbits/sec 
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 974 Mbits/sec  
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 972 Mbits/sec   | 959 Mbits/sec  
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 909 Mbits/sec   | 943 Mbits/sec  
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 488                           
    Multi Core      | 929                           
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/5048180`
    

    It's a storage box. It's not expected to have SSD speeds, it just needs to exceed the network speed between you and the box for you to get all the performance you'd get.

    And yes, it's because it's getting benchmarked to death and many servers provisioned. It'll be better on Tuesday.

    when and where did you see me asking for SSD speeds? I just think that a 3-5 MB/s transfer speed is verging on the unacceptable and if this is the sort of performance they will deliver on a permanent basis, then I'd most likely rather spend my money elsewhere.

    in any case, I'm going to give @servarica_hani the benefit of the doubt until we get a reply. perhaps something went wrong or a few people are abusing the service. I like Québec and the fact the data center is mostly powered using green energy. I want this to work :smile:

    Have you seen the amount of benchmarks people are posting just here? This was also posted in other forums. I'd just make an agreement with them to stay for two more weeks (the dust will be settled by then) and otherwise refund.

Sign In or Register to comment.