Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Advertise on LowEndTalk.com

In this Discussion

Witch one to take for proxmox ?
New on LowEndTalk? Please read our 'Community Rules' by clicking on it in the right menu!

Witch one to take for proxmox ?

https://gyazo.com/d6ded1a42ec8368331f92edfc5a8afc2

The epyc scores lower than the 3900, doesnt make sense to me. Is this true ?

Thanked by 1Kindvn

Comments

  • AC_FanAC_Fan Member

    Epyc is made for enterprises, while the 3900X is a Ryzen, which is technically consumer (Threadripper is prosumer). Also, the AX161 allows for significantly more variation in specifications.

    Honestly, if you don't need customisations, the AX61-NVMe is probably the best high end dedi available right now.

    Thanked by 1Hetzner_OL
  • @AC_Fan said:
    Epyc is made for enterprises, while the 3900X is a Ryzen, which is technically consumer (Threadripper is prosumer). Also, the AX161 allows for significantly more variation in specifications.

    Honestly, if you don't need customisations, the AX61-NVMe is probably the best high end dedi available right now.

    I am aware. Though, alot of my applications are very cpu hogging.

    3900 passmark : 30645 : https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=AMD+Ryzen+9+3900&id=3575
    7502p passmark : 47949 : https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=AMD+EPYC+7502P&id=3538

    Hetzner says only 27437 for 7502p..

    I am confused.

  • AC_FanAC_Fan Member

    @QuangNguyen said:

    @AC_Fan said:
    Epyc is made for enterprises, while the 3900X is a Ryzen, which is technically consumer (Threadripper is prosumer). Also, the AX161 allows for significantly more variation in specifications.

    Honestly, if you don't need customisations, the AX61-NVMe is probably the best high end dedi available right now.

    I am aware. Though, alot of my applications are very cpu hogging.

    3900 passmark : 30645 : https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=AMD+Ryzen+9+3900&id=3575
    7502p passmark : 47949 : https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=AMD+EPYC+7502P&id=3538

    Hetzner says only 27437 for 7502p..

    I am confused.

    Forgot to reply, Hetzner doesn't update the benchmarks. That result was probably added when there were very few processors tested. Now, with a reasonable amount of tests done, it's showing the correct results. However, you should also consider the other AX dedis, all of them are very good from a bang for buck perspective.

Sign In or Register to comment.