Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Advertise on LowEndTalk.com
Anyone interesting in NL AMS Unmetered 1Gbps Xeon D-1531, 32GB DDR4, 2x 500 SSD for 39€?
New on LowEndTalk? Please read our 'Community Rules' by clicking on it in the right menu!

Anyone interesting in NL AMS Unmetered 1Gbps Xeon D-1531, 32GB DDR4, 2x 500 SSD for 39€?

miumiu Member
edited May 16 in General

Hello LET people, i have idling:

Supermicro SYS-5038MD
Intel Xeon D-1531 - 2.2 GHz - 6 core(s) / 12 threads
RAM 32GB - DDR4
STORAGE 2x 500GB (SSD SATA) (possible soft raid 0,1)
BANDWIDTH Unmetered @ 1Gbps
1 IPv4 (another possible add for 2.50€/pc; i know not cheapest..)
no IPv6

Loc: Amsterdam, Netherlands (NL)

and can offer it for sub-lease for 39€/monthly

if anyone interesting then pls PM me, thanks


nench.sh v2019.07.20 -- https://git.io/nench.sh

benchmark timestamp: 2020-05-15 02:23:37 UTC

Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1531 @ 2.20GHz
CPU cores: 12
Frequency: 895.898 MHz
RAM: 31G
Swap: 1.0G
Kernel: Linux 3.10.0-1127.el7.x86_64 x86_64

Disks:
sda 465.8G SSD
sdb 465.8G SSD

CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
1.755 seconds
CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
5.274 seconds
CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
1.513 seconds

ioping: seek rate
min/avg/max/mdev = 77.8 us / 92.5 us / 4.22 ms / 22.0 us
ioping: sequential read speed
generated 8.29 k requests in 5.00 s, 2.02 GiB, 1.66 k iops, 414.3 MiB/s

dd: sequential write speed
1st run: 367.16 MiB/s
2nd run: 367.16 MiB/s
3rd run: 376.70 MiB/s
average: 370.34 MiB/s

IPv4 speedtests

Cachefly CDN:         68.74 MiB/s
Leaseweb (NL):        111.44 MiB/s
Softlayer DAL (US):   0.41 MiB/s
Online.net (FR):      52.78 MiB/s
OVH BHS (CA):         12.84 MiB/s

CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1531 @ 2.20GHz
Number of cores : 12
CPU frequency : 800.158 MHz
Total size of Disk : 458.2 GB (1.8 GB Used)
Total amount of Mem : 31910 MB (340 MB Used)
Total amount of Swap : 1023 MB (0 MB Used)

Load average : 0.30, 0.10, 0.07

I/O speed(1st run) : 387 MB/s
I/O speed(2nd run) : 382 MB/s
I/O speed(3rd run) : 405 MB/s

Average I/O speed : 391.3 MB/s

Node Name IPv4 address Download Speed
CacheFly 205.234.175.175 80.1MB/s
Linode, Tokyo2, JP 139.162.65.37 3.87MB/s
Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 4.14MB/s
Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 55.1MB/s
Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 55.4MB/s
Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 4.67MB/s
Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 11.9MB/s
Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 10.9MB/s
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 41.1MB/s
Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 8.14MB/s

Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 7.13MB/s

8192+0 records in
8192+0 records out
536870912 bytes (537 MB) copied, 1.43315 s, 375 MB/s
rm: remove regular file ‘test’? y
4 KiB <<< / (ext4 /dev/sda2): request=1 time=190.3 us (warmup)
4 KiB <<< / (ext4 /dev/sda2): request=2 time=1.63 ms
4 KiB <<< / (ext4 /dev/sda2): request=3 time=1.67 ms
4 KiB <<< / (ext4 /dev/sda2): request=4 time=1.70 ms
4 KiB <<< / (ext4 /dev/sda2): request=5 time=1.60 ms

--- / (ext4 /dev/sda2) ioping statistics ---
4 requests completed in 6.59 ms, 16 KiB read, 606 iops, 2.37 MiB/s
generated 5 requests in 4.00 s, 20 KiB, 1 iops, 5.00 KiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 1.60 ms / 1.65 ms / 1.70 ms / 37.7 us

--- / (ext4 /dev/sda2) ioping statistics ---
31.5 k requests completed in 2.89 s, 123.0 MiB read, 10.9 k iops, 42.5 MiB/s
generated 31.5 k requests in 3.00 s, 123.0 MiB, 10.5 k iops, 41.0 MiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 77.8 us / 91.9 us / 185.7 us / 9.59 us

--- / (ext4 /dev/sda2) ioping statistics ---
30.4 k requests completed in 2.85 s, 118.7 MiB read, 10.6 k iops, 41.6 MiB/s
generated 30.4 k requests in 3.00 s, 118.7 MiB, 10.1 k iops, 39.6 MiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 81.2 us / 94.0 us / 725.1 us / 10.2 us

Geekbench v4 CPU Benchmark:

Single Core : 3320 (VERY GOOD)
Multi Core : 15692

## IO Test

CPU Speed:
bzip2 : 99.1 MB/s
sha256 : 294 MB/s
md5sum : 402 MB/s

RAM Speed:
Avg. write : 2389.3 MB/s
Avg. read : 4130.1 MB/s

Disk Speed:
1st run : 397 MB/s
2nd run : 404 MB/s
3rd run : 387 MB/s


Average : 396.0 MB/s

## Global Speedtest

Location Upload Download Ping

Speedtest.net 834.16 Mbit/s 906.87 Mbit/s 4.603 ms
UK, London (toob Ltd) 356.05 Mbit/s 728.06 Mbit/s 14.421 ms
France, Lyon (SFR) 525.43 Mbit/s 349.90 Mbit/s 18.557 ms

Germany, Berlin (DNS:NET) 698.95 Mbit/s 625.21 Mbit/s 12.182 ms

Sun May 17 00:41:04 CEST 2020

Basic System Information:

Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1531 @ 2.20GHz
CPU cores : 12 @ 976.867 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM : 31G
Swap : 1.0G
Disk : 458G

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):

Block Size 4kb (IOPS) 64kb (IOPS)
Read 179.49 MB/s (44.8k) 228.62 MB/s (3.5k)
Write 179.97 MB/s (44.9k) 229.82 MB/s (3.5k)
Total 359.47 MB/s (89.8k) 458.44 MB/s (7.1k)
Block Size 512kb (IOPS) 1mb (IOPS)
------ ----- ---- --- ----
Read 229.27 MB/s (447) 235.80 MB/s (230)
Write 241.46 MB/s (471) 251.50 MB/s (245)
Total 470.74 MB/s (918) 487.31 MB/s (475)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):

Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
| | |
Bouygues Telecom | Paris, FR (10G) | 935 Mbits/sec | 885 Mbits/sec
Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | 938 Mbits/sec | 895 Mbits/sec
WorldStream | The Netherlands (10G) | 941 Mbits/sec | 942 Mbits/sec
wilhelm.tel | Hamburg, DE (10G) | 937 Mbits/sec | 932 Mbits/sec
Biznet | Bogor, Indonesia (1G) | 458 Mbits/sec | 73.1 Mbits/sec
Hostkey | Moscow, RU (1G) | 917 Mbits/sec | 925 Mbits/sec
Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 195 Mbits/sec | 185 Mbits/sec
Airstream Communications | Eau Claire, WI, US (10G) | 850 Mbits/sec | 202 Mbits/sec
Hurricane Electric | Fremont, CA, US (10G) | 851 Mbits/sec | 211 Mbits/sec

my FAVS (random order): Nexus bytes, HostHatch, LetBox, Vultr, BuyVM, HudsonValey, ExtraVM, OVH, Hetzner, CrownCloud, RamNode

THANKS

Comments

  • RickBakkrRickBakkr Member, LIR

    Mind sharing with what provider and network it is hosted? :)

  • thedpthedp Member

    @RickBakkr said:
    Mind sharing with what provider and network it is hosted? :)

    Looks like Scaleway.

    Thanked by 1RickBakkr
  • CConnerCConner Member, Provider

    Keep in mind he is sub leasing it so that means you won't actually own it.

    GameDash, an AIO solution uniting billing, support & game server management platform.
    Visit our website or join our Discord to find out more.

  • miumiu Member
    edited May 17

    Can create sub-account for this server = mean its user can do the same as me through original control panel. Also can provide invoice for this service as company for company. So practically is the same as reseller (but i have only one, not regular/more stock available)

    BTW: When u order only server (rent) directly from OVH, Hetzner etc., also u do not own it, still only lease it, but yes, i admit (without doubt) one big different/advantage is there, of course - u get server without another/useless middle man (what is reseller.. or me in my case), so then i think it is mainly about credibility, seriousness and reliability of me/reseller and potential user (in other case this just can be great complication). Contrariwise, only one advantage what i can offer is maybe a bit better price for anyone (it was "caught" as special/limited offer in clearance sale.) In the end, I fully agree that what you wrote above is true, without doubt, I do not deny the fact. Thanks for your understanding.

    my FAVS (random order): Nexus bytes, HostHatch, LetBox, Vultr, BuyVM, HudsonValey, ExtraVM, OVH, Hetzner, CrownCloud, RamNode

    THANKS

  • hzrhzr Member, Moderator

    miu said: u get server without another/useless middle man

    yeah, the problem here is what if you don't pay, and you can revoke the sub-user at any time.

  • DrFallenDrFallen Member, Provider

    @hzr said:

    miu said: u get server without another/useless middle man

    yeah, the problem here is what if you don't pay, and you can revoke the sub-user at any time.

    I mean isn't op the middle man technically. It'd probably just be better to release back into pool instead of idling for the 10 ish euro difference.

  • miumiu Member
    edited May 17

    @hzr said:

    miu said: u get server without another/useless middle man

    yeah, the problem here is what if you don't pay, and you can revoke the sub-user at any time.

    No reason for both, while sub-user will pay and no complaints/abuse (because i still will have little profit from it)
    BTW: Both - till server is prepaid and if there are any complaints/abuse warning can sub-user see in subaccount in original CP.

    my FAVS (random order): Nexus bytes, HostHatch, LetBox, Vultr, BuyVM, HudsonValey, ExtraVM, OVH, Hetzner, CrownCloud, RamNode

    THANKS

  • miumiu Member
    edited May 17

    @DrFallen said:

    @hzr said:

    miu said: u get server without another/useless middle man

    yeah, the problem here is what if you don't pay, and you can revoke the sub-user at any time.

    I mean isn't op the middle man technically. It'd probably just be better to release back into pool instead of idling for the 10 ish euro difference.

    Sure, if I will not find anyone I'll release the server and do not will hold it idling/useless
    Then it will be back for anyone new, but already for full price probably (probably higher as i can offer now)

    my FAVS (random order): Nexus bytes, HostHatch, LetBox, Vultr, BuyVM, HudsonValey, ExtraVM, OVH, Hetzner, CrownCloud, RamNode

    THANKS

  • Hetzner_OLHetzner_OL Member, Provider, Top Provider

    @miu - Perhaps your provider has a transfer policy/process/forum page/chat..? That way, you could fully transfer the server to a new customer. We provide a space for this on our customer forum. Maybe your provider does something similar...? --Katie

    We (Katie and Helena) will do our best to answer your Hetzner questions and pass on your feedback. Hetzner Online's not liable for any corny jokes that we make. (https://www.hetzner.com)

  • miumiu Member
    edited May 19

    @Hetzner_OL said:

    @miu - Perhaps your provider has a transfer policy/process/forum page/chat..? That way, you could fully transfer the server to a new customer. We provide a space for this on our customer forum. Maybe your provider does something similar...? --Katie

    Hello. Thank you for your suggestion.

    UPDATE: The server is now taken so this is no more actual/available.

    Also i must say current offers from Hetzner are currently unbeatable IMO => i will also choose just Hetzner when another server in DE i will need.

    Would be very nice if Hetzner will expand also to other countries (mean NL, UK, US)..
    Is such anything planned in near future??

    Thanks for the info

    my FAVS (random order): Nexus bytes, HostHatch, LetBox, Vultr, BuyVM, HudsonValey, ExtraVM, OVH, Hetzner, CrownCloud, RamNode

    THANKS

  • Hetzner_OLHetzner_OL Member, Provider, Top Provider

    Thanks for the feedback! We're glad that you're already thinking about us for your next DE server.

    We want to expand, but we want to do it right. We're a privately-owned company. There's no investors that we need to appease, so we can invest profits directly back in the company, which is a good thing. But being privately owned can slow down expansion, unfortunately.

    We're always on the lookout for opportunities involving new locations and in other countries. But for now, we have no decisive or set plans.

    We prefer to publish information like this only once decisions are official. So if/when I hear news about this, we'll make sure to publish it on our social media channels and in forums like LET. :) --Katie

    Thanked by 1miu

    We (Katie and Helena) will do our best to answer your Hetzner questions and pass on your feedback. Hetzner Online's not liable for any corny jokes that we make. (https://www.hetzner.com)

  • CConnerCConner Member, Provider

    @Hetzner_OL said:
    Thanks for the feedback! We're glad that you're already thinking about us for your next DE server.

    We want to expand, but we want to do it right. We're a privately-owned company. There's no investors that we need to appease, so we can invest profits directly back in the company, which is a good thing. But being privately owned can slow down expansion, unfortunately.

    We're always on the lookout for opportunities involving new locations and in other countries. But for now, we have no decisive or set plans.

    We prefer to publish information like this only once decisions are official. So if/when I hear news about this, we'll make sure to publish it on our social media channels and in forums like LET. :) --Katie

    How's the location in Finland doing? Was it a success?

    GameDash, an AIO solution uniting billing, support & game server management platform.
    Visit our website or join our Discord to find out more.

  • Hetzner_OLHetzner_OL Member, Provider, Top Provider

    I would say yes, but there is still progress happening there. Our team there is growing, as is our number of clients and active servers. We also are still constructing new data center units. If anyone on LET is near Helsinki and curious about positions, they should check out Hetzner Finland on LInkedIn. Our colleagues there also sometimes post pictures from the Helsinki location. --Katie

    We (Katie and Helena) will do our best to answer your Hetzner questions and pass on your feedback. Hetzner Online's not liable for any corny jokes that we make. (https://www.hetzner.com)

Sign In or Register to comment.