Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Advertise on LowEndTalk.com
[NL] NVMe VPS on Ryzen 9 3900X CPU, starting at €2.50 per month!
New on LowEndTalk? Please read our 'Community Rules' by clicking on it in the right menu!

[NL] NVMe VPS on Ryzen 9 3900X CPU, starting at €2.50 per month!

spectraipspectraip Member, Provider

SpectraIP is a large server provider in Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

SpectraIP offers virtual servers, dedicated servers and colocation on a rock-solid redundantly connected network (AS62068), connected to redundant fibre-optic connections, redundant cooling and power connection. We have a monthly uptime guarantee of 99.9%.

Can’t find the deal you’re looking for below or at our website? Just contact our sales department and we’re happy to send you a custom offer matching your requirements. We offer (dedicated) servers at beating prices.

Why SpectraIP?

Trusted company, providing services since 2013
Secure order process and automatic administration
We believe in freedom on the internet
99.9% uptime guarantee
No contracts, servers can be billed month-to-month
Bandwidth, server and rDNS management
IRC, game servers, streaming, shoutcast, VPN and adult content allowed
Support at your service 24/7, including holidays
All hardware and IP space is owned by SpectraIP
Instant setup!

VPS X1
€ 2.50 per month

1 GB DDR4 RAM
1 CPU core
30 GB SSD (NVMe storage!)
1 TB bandwidth
Order here

VPS X2
€ 4.50 per month

2 GB DDR4 RAM
1 CPU core
60 GB SSD (NVMe storage!)
2.5 TB bandwidth
Order here

More packages (custom packages available, please contact sales for a custom offer).

We offer free test servers for 24 hours. Please contact us to request a test VPS.

Resources are dedicated, no overselling. Each VPS has at least 500 mbps available bandwidth.

Additional discount:
Quarterly payment: 5% discount
Payment per half year: 10% discount
Payment per year: 15% discount

Payment methods:

  • PayPal
  • Creditcard
  • Bitcoins
  • Altcoins
  • Wire transfer
  • iDEAL
  • MisterCash
    For PayPal and Credit Card, transaction costs will be charged to the customer.

SpectraIP B.V.

Network: AS62068
Website: https://spectraip.net
Contact details: https://spectraip.net/contact
Dutch CoC number: 70348677

Business address:
Bruynvisweg 11
1531 AX Wormer
Netherlands

«1

Comments

  • lontonglontong Member

    looking glass?

  • notarobonotarobo Member

    what is cpu policy?

  • kenhsongaokenhsongao Member without signature

    Do you have affiliate program?

  • jsgjsg Member

    What virtualization? KVM?
    What is a vCore ("CPU core")? Is it a real core? A real HWT? Or some fraction and if so how what fraction? Also: What class of CPU (e.g. E5-26xx, E5-26xx v3, Scalable, Ryzen, Epyc,. etc)?

    Thanks no.

  • corbpiecorbpie Member

    What ever happened to people reading????

    Thanked by 1PulsedMedia

    grape

  • spectraipspectraip Member, Provider

    @lontong said:
    looking glass?

    Our network is AS62068, a free test VPS is available upon request.

    @notarobo said:
    what is cpu policy?

    Resources are dedicated, no throttling. This means you can use the resources we have assigned to your VPS 24/7.

    @kenhsongao said:
    Do you have affiliate program?

    Sure, please mail [email protected] for this :smile:

    @jsg said:
    What virtualization? KVM?
    What is a vCore ("CPU core")? Is it a real core? A real HWT? Or some fraction and if so how what fraction? Also: What class of CPU (e.g. E5-26xx, E5-26xx v3, Scalable, Ryzen, Epyc,. etc)?

    CPUs we are using: Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 9 3950X

    Thanked by 2pbx notarobo
  • jsgjsg Member

    @spectraip said:
    CPUs we are using: Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 9 3950X

    Thanks. And a "CPU core" of the offered VPS is 1 full HWT or 1 full core (with 2 HWTs) or what fraction of a core or HWT?

    Thanked by 1pbx

    Thanks no.

  • thedpthedp Member

    How many v4s and v6s?

    DomainPeon
    Ongoing Auctions: LowEndTalk | HostedTalk

  • spectraipspectraip Member, Provider

    @jsg said:

    @spectraip said:
    CPUs we are using: Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 9 3950X

    Thanks. And a "CPU core" of the offered VPS is 1 full HWT or 1 full core (with 2 HWTs) or what fraction of a core or HWT?

    It's 1 full HWT core of the CPU.

    @thedp said:
    How many v4s and v6s?

    1 IPv4, IPv6 /64 will be added soon to each VPS!

    Thanked by 1jsg
  • RedSoxRedSox Member

    YABS and Monster Bench please?
    Bench bench bench!

  • thedpthedp Member

    @spectraip said: 1 IPv4, IPv6 /64 will be added soon to each VPS!

    So now it comes with only 1 IPv4?

    How soon will the IPv6 be available? CC kinda soon?

    DomainPeon
    Ongoing Auctions: LowEndTalk | HostedTalk

  • pbxpbx Member

    Seems really nice, even though I dislike it when customer portal is behind CF (why would I have to give my personal details to CF?).

  • dz_pajidz_paji Member
    -------------------------------------------------
     nench.sh v2019.07.20 -- https://git.io/nench.sh
     benchmark timestamp:    2020-05-16 12:43:34 UTC
    -------------------------------------------------
    
    Processor:    QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
    CPU cores:    1
    Frequency:    3792.874 MHz
    RAM:          989M
    Swap:         -
    Kernel:       Linux 4.9.215-36.el7.x86_64 x86_64
    
    Disks:
    vda     30G  HDD
    
    CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
        1.622 seconds
    CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
        CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
        2.065 seconds
    
    ioping: seek rate
        min/avg/max/mdev = 77.4 us / 106.3 us / 6.03 ms / 78.2 us
    ioping: sequential read speed
        generated 12.9 k requests in 5.01 s, 3.16 GiB, 2.59 k iops, 646.7 MiB/s
    
    dd: sequential write speed
        1st run:    1621.25 MiB/s
        2nd run:    1716.61 MiB/s
        3rd run:    1716.61 MiB/s
        average:    1684.82 MiB/s
    
    IPv4 speedtests
        your IPv4:    45.14.224.xxxx
    
        Cachefly CDN:         55.31 MiB/s
        Leaseweb (NL):        53.35 MiB/s
        Softlayer DAL (US):   4.88 MiB/s
        Online.net (FR):      41.55 MiB/s
        OVH BHS (CA):         7.38 MiB/s
    
    No IPv6 connectivity detected
    -------------------------------------------------
    

    Just got a VPS X1. Don't know why it is saying the disk is HDD instead of SSD/NVMe.

    Thanked by 1t0m

    Chill chill

  • debaserdebaser Member

    Because it’s a virtual disk.

    Thanked by 1coreflux
  • zevuszevus Member
    edited May 16

    Google translate may have failed at some point here -- I'm not sure what 1.1 means.

    1.1 All offers from SpectraIP are without obligation, unless explicitly stated otherwise.
    
    ....
    
    1.5 The agreement is always tacitly renewed for the same period as it is agreed in the invoice, unless 1 (one) of both parties agrees to the agreement at least 1(one) month prior to the expiration of the agreed period.
    1.6 Unless otherwise stated in the agreement, cancellation of the agreement must be in writing to be made with due observance of a notice period of 1 (one) month before the end of the agreed period. Cancellation must be in writing, on the understanding that the notice period only starts on the day on which SpectraIP receives the cancellation.
    

    So on a month to month & directly after ordering, if I cancel, this will count as a full month?

    Unsure about the writing part or about the day that SpectraIP receives cancellation. Maybe it's some Google translate issue.

    Also,

    Payment Gateway Charge ( PayPal (€ 0.35 + 3.40%) € 0.35 + 3.40% ) *

    I think the nomenclature of this needs to be changed, to not violate Paypal's merchant TOS, or maybe that's just for US.

  • jsgjsg Member

    @spectraip said:

    @jsg said:
    Thanks. And a "CPU core" of the offered VPS is 1 full HWT or 1 full core (with 2 HWTs) or what fraction of a core or HWT?

    It's 1 full HWT core of the CPU [Ryzen 39x0X].

    Nice! Very nice indeed. I also commend your transparency.

    Thanks no.

  • SwiftnodeSwiftnode Member, Provider

    @pbx said:
    Seems really nice, even though I dislike it when customer portal is behind CF (why would I have to give my personal details to CF?).

    You're not giving cloudflare your personal details. The data would be encrypted.

    Cloudflare's argo is great. Surprised more providers haven't taken advantage of it to speed up their sites globally.

  • RickBakkrRickBakkr Member, LIR
    edited May 16

    Swiftnode said: You're not giving cloudflare your personal details. The data would be encrypted.

    You are kidding right... They are literally a man in the middle - who can see everything passing by... And that coming from someone (supposedly) being a provider...

    Cloudflare is horrid.. if I am not enough to convince you, please see: https://iscloudflaresafeyet.com/

    Thanked by 2pbx jsg
  • notarobonotarobo Member
    edited May 16

    is X4 also 3900X and will it allow a 100% cpu passthru

  • miumiu Member
    edited May 16
    ----------------------------------------------
     nench.sh v2019.07.20 -- https://git.io/nench.sh
     benchmark timestamp:    2020-05-16 13:18:22 UTC
    -------------------------------------------------
    
    
    Processor:    QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
    CPU cores:    1
    Frequency:    3792.874 MHz
    RAM:          990M
    Swap:         1.0G
    Kernel:       Linux 3.10.0-1062.1.1.el7.x86_64 x86_64
    
    Disks:
    vda     30G  HDD
    
    CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
        1.567 seconds
    CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
        3.659 seconds
    CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
        2.082 seconds
    
    ioping: seek rate
        min/avg/max/mdev = 77.9 us / 111.8 us / 7.66 ms / 116.3 us
    ioping: sequential read speed
        generated 13.2 k requests in 5.03 s, 3.23 GiB, 2.63 k iops, 656.6 MiB/s
    
    dd: sequential write speed
        1st run:    953.67 MiB/s
        2nd run:    1811.98 MiB/s
        3rd run:    1811.98 MiB/s
        average:    1525.88 MiB/s
    
    IPv4 speedtests
        your IPv4:    
    
        Cachefly CDN:         11.37 MiB/s
        Leaseweb (NL):        10.95 MiB/s
        Softlayer DAL (US):   3.01 MiB/s
        Online.net (FR):      11.28 MiB/s
        OVH BHS (CA):         4.67 MiB/s

    my FAVS (random order): Nexus bytes, HostHatch, LetBox, Vultr, BuyVM, HudsonValey, ExtraVM, OVH, Hetzner, CrownCloud, RamNode

    THANKS

  • debaserdebaser Member

    Download speeds are a bit low I guess.

    Give us some yabs bench.

  • miumiu Member

    @spectraip quest:
    my VM seems to be capped on 100Mbit only, can u have pls look on it?

    my FAVS (random order): Nexus bytes, HostHatch, LetBox, Vultr, BuyVM, HudsonValey, ExtraVM, OVH, Hetzner, CrownCloud, RamNode

    THANKS

  • miumiu Member

    @debaser said:
    Download speeds are a bit low I guess.

    yes currently i also see it (in comparison with the same bench posted above)

    my FAVS (random order): Nexus bytes, HostHatch, LetBox, Vultr, BuyVM, HudsonValey, ExtraVM, OVH, Hetzner, CrownCloud, RamNode

    THANKS

  • notarobonotarobo Member

    @miu said:

    ----------------------------------------------
    >  nench.sh v2019.07.20 -- https://git.io/nench.sh
    >  benchmark timestamp:    2020-05-16 13:18:22 UTC
    > -------------------------------------------------
    > 
    > 
    > Processor:    QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
    > CPU cores:    1
    > Frequency:    3792.874 MHz
    > RAM:          990M
    > Swap:         1.0G
    > Kernel:       Linux 3.10.0-1062.1.1.el7.x86_64 x86_64
    > 
    > Disks:
    > vda     30G  HDD
    > 
    > CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
    >     1.567 seconds
    > CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
    >     3.659 seconds
    > CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
    >     2.082 seconds
    > 
    > ioping: seek rate
    >     min/avg/max/mdev = 77.9 us / 111.8 us / 7.66 ms / 116.3 us
    > ioping: sequential read speed
    >     generated 13.2 k requests in 5.03 s, 3.23 GiB, 2.63 k iops, 656.6 MiB/s
    > 
    > dd: sequential write speed
    >     1st run:    953.67 MiB/s
    >     2nd run:    1811.98 MiB/s
    >     3rd run:    1811.98 MiB/s
    >     average:    1525.88 MiB/s
    > 
    > IPv4 speedtests
    >     your IPv4:    
    > 
    >     Cachefly CDN:         11.37 MiB/s
    >     Leaseweb (NL):        10.95 MiB/s
    >     Softlayer DAL (US):   3.01 MiB/s
    >     Online.net (FR):      11.28 MiB/s
    >     OVH BHS (CA):         4.67 MiB/s

    power looks like not full and no AES enable

  • miumiu Member
    edited May 16

    @dz_paji said:

    Just got a VPS X1. Don't know why it is saying the disk is HDD instead of SSD/NVMe.

    This BENCH (nench.sh) ALWAYS calls disk as "HDD"

    But from speed results u can see it's should be real NVMe

    my FAVS (random order): Nexus bytes, HostHatch, LetBox, Vultr, BuyVM, HudsonValey, ExtraVM, OVH, Hetzner, CrownCloud, RamNode

    THANKS

  • miumiu Member

    System Information

    OS Name : CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 (Core) N (64 bit)
    Kernel : KVM / 3.10.0-1062.1.1.el7.x86_64
    Hostname : ryzen.vps.comm
    CPU Model : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
    CPU Cores : 1 core @ 3792.874 MHz
    CPU Cache : 512 KB
    Total RAM : 990 MiB (Free 779 MiB)
    Total SWAP : 1023 MiB (Free 1023MiB)
    Total Space : 29GB (5% used)
    Running for : 14 minutes 31 seconds

    ## CDN Speedtest

    CacheFly : 11.30 MiB/s | 90.37 Mbps | ping 1.522ms
    Gdrive : 11.67 KiB/s | 0.09 Mbps | ping 1.176ms

    ## North America Speedtest

    Softlayer, Washington, USA : 4.18 MiB/s | 33.42 Mbps | ping 80.436ms
    SoftLayer, San Jose, USA : 2.52 MiB/s | 20.18 Mbps | ping 141.424ms
    SoftLayer, Dallas, USA : 0 B/s | N/A | ping error!
    Vultr, New Jersey, USA : 9.34 MiB/s | 74.72 Mbps | ping 80.257ms
    Vultr, Seattle, USA : 7.23 MiB/s | 57.83 Mbps | ping 147.394ms
    Vultr, Dallas, USA : 7.20 MiB/s | 57.59 Mbps | ping 113.371ms
    Vultr, Los Angeles, USA : 5.69 MiB/s | 45.51 Mbps | ping 147.040ms
    Ramnode, New York, USA : 3.98 MiB/s | 31.80 Mbps | ping 74.203ms
    Ramnode, Atlanta, USA : 3.54 MiB/s | 28.36 Mbps | ping 102.098ms
    OVH, Beauharnois, Canada : 4.10 MiB/s | 32.78 Mbps | ping 90.308ms

    ## Europe Speedtest

    Vultr, London, UK : 11.25 MiB/s | 90.03 Mbps | ping 7.778ms
    LeaseWeb, Frankfurt, Germany : 7.82 MiB/s | 62.59 Mbps | ping 8.208ms
    Hetzner, Germany : 10.89 MiB/s | 87.08 Mbps | ping 9.947ms
    Ramnode, Alblasserdam, NL : 11.30 MiB/s | 90.40 Mbps | ping 3.778ms
    Vultr, Amsterdam, NL : 11.32 MiB/s | 90.56 Mbps | ping 1.632ms
    EDIS, Stockholm, Sweden : 2.45 KiB/s | 0.02 Mbps | ping 22.141ms
    OVH, Roubaix, France : 11.18 MiB/s | 89.42 Mbps | ping 10.604ms
    Online, France : 11.19 MiB/s | 89.50 Mbps | ping 13.769ms
    Prometeus, Milan, Italy : 7.26 KiB/s | 0.06 Mbps | ping 18.571ms

    ## Exotic Speedtest

    Sydney, Australia : 2.07 MiB/s | 16.56 Mbps | ping 268.372ms
    Lagoon, New Caledonia : 0 B/s | N/A | ping error!
    Hosteasy, Moldova : 9.59 MiB/s | 76.71 Mbps | ping 40.530ms
    Prima, Argentina : 0.99 MiB/s | 7.92 Mbps | ping error!

    ## Asia Speedtest

    SoftLayer, Singapore : 2.11 MiB/s | 16.89 Mbps | ping 161.566ms
    Linode, Tokyo, Japan : 1.04 MiB/s | 8.36 Mbps | ping 270.710ms
    Linode, Singapore : 1.74 MiB/s | 13.94 Mbps | ping 187.818ms
    Vultr, Tokyo, Japan : 4.62 MiB/s | 36.99 Mbps | ping 225.802ms

    ## IO Test

    CPU Speed:
    bzip2 512MB - 149 MB/s
    sha256 512MB - 345 MB/s
    md5sum 512MB - 645 MB/s

    Disk Speed (512MB):
    I/O Speed - 2.1 GB/s
    I/O Direct - 119 MB/s

    RAM Speed (495MB):
    Avg. write - 4949.3 MB/s
    Avg. read - 9454.9 MB/s


    CPU model : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
    Number of cores : 1
    CPU frequency : 3792.874 MHz
    Total size of Disk : 29.0 GB (1.4 GB Used)
    Total amount of Mem : 990 MB (67 MB Used)
    Total amount of Swap : 1023 MB (0 MB Used)
    System uptime : 0 days, 2 hour 6 min
    Load average : 0.00, 0.01, 0.05
    OS : CentOS 7.7.1908
    Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)

    Kernel : 3.10.0-1062.1.1.el7.x86_64

    I/O speed(1st run) : 2.0 GB/s
    I/O speed(2nd run) : 2.1 GB/s
    I/O speed(3rd run) : 2.1 GB/s

    Average I/O speed : 2116.3 MB/s

    Node Name IPv4 address Download Speed
    CacheFly 205.234.175.175 11.4MB/s
    Linode, Tokyo2, JP 139.162.65.37 3.10MB/s
    Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 1016KB/s
    Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 11.4MB/s
    Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 11.4MB/s
    Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 4.71MB/s
    Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 5.44MB/s
    Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 4.23MB/s
    Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 1.15MB/s
    Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 4.22MB/s

    Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 1.13MB/s

    8192+0 records in
    8192+0 records out
    536870912 bytes (537 MB) copied, 0.281109 s, 1.9 GB/s
    rm: remove regular file ‘test’? y
    4 KiB <<< / (ext4 /dev/vda1): request=1 time=116.9 us (warmup)
    4 KiB <<< / (ext4 /dev/vda1): request=2 time=282.1 us
    4 KiB <<< / (ext4 /dev/vda1): request=3 time=260.0 us
    4 KiB <<< / (ext4 /dev/vda1): request=4 time=597.7 us
    4 KiB <<< / (ext4 /dev/vda1): request=5 time=278.5 us

    --- / (ext4 /dev/vda1) ioping statistics ---
    4 requests completed in 1.42 ms, 16 KiB read, 2.82 k iops, 11.0 MiB/s
    generated 5 requests in 4.00 s, 20 KiB, 1 iops, 5.00 KiB/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 260.0 us / 354.6 us / 597.7 us / 140.6 us

    --- / (ext4 /dev/vda1) ioping statistics ---
    30.2 k requests completed in 2.99 s, 117.8 MiB read, 10.1 k iops, 39.5 MiB/s
    generated 30.2 k requests in 3.00 s, 117.8 MiB, 10.1 k iops, 39.3 MiB/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 74.9 us / 99.0 us / 3.48 ms / 58.4 us

    --- / (ext4 /dev/vda1) ioping statistics ---
    24.8 k requests completed in 2.96 s, 96.8 MiB read, 8.38 k iops, 32.8 MiB/s
    generated 24.8 k requests in 3.00 s, 96.8 MiB, 8.26 k iops, 32.3 MiB/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 77.4 us / 119.2 us / 5.33 ms / 123.6 us

    my FAVS (random order): Nexus bytes, HostHatch, LetBox, Vultr, BuyVM, HudsonValey, ExtraVM, OVH, Hetzner, CrownCloud, RamNode

    THANKS

  • miumiu Member
    edited May 16

    ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

    Yet-Another-Bench-Script

    v2020-02-10

    https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script

    ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

    Sat May 16 11:31:44 EDT 2020

    Basic System Information:

    Processor : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
    CPU cores : 1 @ 3792.874 MHz
    AES-NI : ❌ Disabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM : 990M
    Swap : 1.0G
    Disk : 29G

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):

    Block Size 4kb (IOPS) 64kb (IOPS)
    Read 68.12 MB/s (17.0k) 314.39 MB/s (4.9k)
    Write 68.32 MB/s (17.0k) 316.04 MB/s (4.9k)
    Total 136.44 MB/s (34.1k) 630.43 MB/s (9.8k)
    Block Size 512kb (IOPS) 1mb (IOPS)
    ------ ----- ---- --- ----
    Read 894.43 MB/s (1.7k) 1.13 GB/s (1.1k)
    Write 941.95 MB/s (1.8k) 1.20 GB/s (1.1k)
    Total 1.83 GB/s (3.5k) 2.34 GB/s (2.2k)

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):

    Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
    | | |
    Bouygues Telecom | Paris, FR (10G) | 98.8 Mbits/sec | 6.96 Mbits/sec
    Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | 98.9 Mbits/sec | 95.5 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream | The Netherlands (10G) | busy | busy
    wilhelm.tel | Hamburg, DE (10G) | 99.0 Mbits/sec | 95.5 Mbits/sec
    Biznet | Bogor, Indonesia (1G) | 83.1 Mbits/sec | 53.2 Mbits/sec
    Hostkey | Moscow, RU (1G) | 98.1 Mbits/sec | 93.0 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 92.7 Mbits/sec | 91.3 Mbits/sec
    Airstream Communications | Eau Claire, WI, US (10G) | 85.9 Mbits/sec | 82.5 Mbits/sec
    Hurricane Electric | Fremont, CA, US (10G) | 83.8 Mbits/sec | 70.0 Mbits/sec

    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 956
    Multi Core | 956

    my FAVS (random order): Nexus bytes, HostHatch, LetBox, Vultr, BuyVM, HudsonValey, ExtraVM, OVH, Hetzner, CrownCloud, RamNode

    THANKS

  • spectraipspectraip Member, Provider

    @miu said:
    @spectraip quest:
    my VM seems to be capped on 100Mbit only, can u have pls look on it?

    Please open a ticket and we will unlock bandwidth. Sometimes it's capped for new created virtual servers (due to safety reasons for abuse cases).

    Thanks!

    Thanked by 1miu
  • miumiu Member
    edited May 16

    yes thanks

    UPDATE: issue fixed

    my FAVS (random order): Nexus bytes, HostHatch, LetBox, Vultr, BuyVM, HudsonValey, ExtraVM, OVH, Hetzner, CrownCloud, RamNode

    THANKS

  • spectraipspectraip Member, Provider

    @zevus said:
    Google translate may have failed at some point here -- I'm not sure what 1.1 means.

    1.1 All offers from SpectraIP are without obligation, unless explicitly stated otherwise.
    
    ....
    
    1.5 The agreement is always tacitly renewed for the same period as it is agreed in the invoice, unless 1 (one) of both parties agrees to the agreement at least 1(one) month prior to the expiration of the agreed period.
    1.6 Unless otherwise stated in the agreement, cancellation of the agreement must be in writing to be made with due observance of a notice period of 1 (one) month before the end of the agreed period. Cancellation must be in writing, on the understanding that the notice period only starts on the day on which SpectraIP receives the cancellation.
    

    So on a month to month & directly after ordering, if I cancel, this will count as a full month?

    Unsure about the writing part or about the day that SpectraIP receives cancellation. Maybe it's some Google translate issue.

    Also,

    Payment Gateway Charge ( PayPal (€ 0.35 + 3.40%) € 0.35 + 3.40% ) *

    I think the nomenclature of this needs to be changed, to not violate Paypal's merchant TOS, or maybe that's just for US.

    The service is "prepaid", you can cancel any time you want. There are no minimum contract terms.

  • miumiu Member

    100 mbit speed limit issue fixed


    OS : CentOS 7.7.1908 (64 Bit)
    Virt/Kernel : KVM / 3.10.0-1062.1.1.el7.x86_64
    CPU Model : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
    CPU Cores : 1 @ 3792.874 MHz x86_64 512 KB Cache
    CPU Flags : AES-NI Disabled & VM-x/AMD-V Enabled
    Load Average : 0.00, 0.03, 0.07
    Total Space : 29G (1.4G ~6% used)
    Total RAM : 990 MB (69 MB + 77 MB Buff in use)
    Total SWAP : 1023 MB (0 MB in use)

    Uptime : 0 days 2:42

    ASN & ISP : AS62068, SpectraIP B.V.
    Organization : SpectraIP B.V.
    Location : Amsterdam, Netherlands / NL

    Region : North Holland

    ## Geekbench v4 CPU Benchmark:

    Single Core : 4488 (EXCELLENT)
    Multi Core : 4323

    ## IO Test

    CPU Speed:
    bzip2 : 147 MB/s
    sha256 : 334 MB/s
    md5sum : 656 MB/s

    RAM Speed:
    Avg. write : 5256.5 MB/s
    Avg. read : 10444.8 MB/s

    Disk Speed:
    1st run : 2.0 GB/s
    2nd run : 2.0 GB/s
    3rd run : 2.0 GB/s


    Average : 2048.0 MB/s

    ## Global Speedtest

    Location Upload Download Ping

    Speedtest.net 13.70 Mbit/s 257.77 Mbit/s 3.749 ms
    UK, London (toob Ltd) 143.12 Mbit/s 450.17 Mbit/s 6.892 ms
    France, Lyon (SFR) 11.96 Mbit/s 122.95 Mbit/s 16.466 ms

    Germany, Berlin (DNS:NET) 126.71 Mbit/s 20.21 Mbit/s 15.756 ms

    my FAVS (random order): Nexus bytes, HostHatch, LetBox, Vultr, BuyVM, HudsonValey, ExtraVM, OVH, Hetzner, CrownCloud, RamNode

    THANKS

  • miumiu Member

    stem Information

    OS Name : CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 (Core) N (64 bit)
    Kernel : KVM / 3.10.0-1062.1.1.el7.x86_64
    Hostname : ryzen.vps.comm
    CPU Model : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
    CPU Cores : 1 core @ 3792.874 MHz
    CPU Cache : 512 KB
    Total RAM : 990 MiB (Free 811 MiB)
    Total SWAP : 1023 MiB (Free 1023MiB)
    Total Space : 29GB (5% used)
    Running for : 2hrs 58min 59sec

    ## CDN Speedtest

    CacheFly : 54.87 MiB/s | 438.97 Mbps | ping 1.065ms
    Gdrive : 10.97 KiB/s | 0.09 Mbps | ping 1.153ms

    ## North America Speedtest

    Softlayer, Washington, USA : 5.62 MiB/s | 44.97 Mbps | ping 80.130ms
    SoftLayer, San Jose, USA : 3.17 MiB/s | 25.32 Mbps | ping 141.330ms
    SoftLayer, Dallas, USA : 0 B/s | N/A | ping error!
    Vultr, New Jersey, USA : 0 B/s | N/A | ping 80.276ms
    Vultr, Seattle, USA : 10.97 MiB/s | 87.79 Mbps | ping 147.175ms
    Vultr, Dallas, USA : 11.60 MiB/s | 92.83 Mbps | ping 113.271ms
    Vultr, Los Angeles, USA : 11.02 MiB/s | 88.17 Mbps | ping 146.692ms
    Ramnode, New York, USA : 5.63 MiB/s | 45.01 Mbps | ping 74.187ms
    Ramnode, Atlanta, USA : 4.21 MiB/s | 33.68 Mbps | ping 102.037ms
    OVH, Beauharnois, Canada : 3.45 MiB/s | 27.62 Mbps | ping 90.140ms

    ## Europe Speedtest

    Vultr, London, UK : 54.05 MiB/s | 432.38 Mbps | ping 7.815ms
    LeaseWeb, Frankfurt, Germany : 45.14 MiB/s | 361.09 Mbps | ping 7.686ms
    Hetzner, Germany : 37.61 MiB/s | 300.86 Mbps | ping 10.008ms
    Ramnode, Alblasserdam, NL : 52.95 MiB/s | 423.62 Mbps | ping 3.668ms
    Vultr, Amsterdam, NL : 55.43 MiB/s | 443.46 Mbps | ping 1.886ms
    EDIS, Stockholm, Sweden : 3.68 KiB/s | 0.03 Mbps | ping 22.424ms
    OVH, Roubaix, France : 39.33 MiB/s | 314.60 Mbps | ping 10.282ms
    Online, France : 36.94 MiB/s | 295.55 Mbps | ping 13.368ms
    Prometeus, Milan, Italy : 7.29 KiB/s | 0.06 Mbps | ping 18.682ms

    my FAVS (random order): Nexus bytes, HostHatch, LetBox, Vultr, BuyVM, HudsonValey, ExtraVM, OVH, Hetzner, CrownCloud, RamNode

    THANKS

  • pbxpbx Member

    Swiftnode said: You're not giving cloudflare your personal details. The data would be encrypted.

    as @RickBakkr said, it's encrypted from you to CF and (potentially, you have no way to know) from CF to the backend server. But it has to be unencrypted on CF end. If they wanted, CF could harvest users data. Maybe they do, maybe they don't. But using them when you are an EU provider makes your customer's private information transit through a US company. Sounds a big weird to me: I'd rather connect directly to the provider I decide to trust with my personal information. I understand that CF is useful, easy, cheap, but is that a reason to use them for the most sensitive area of a website? I don't think so.

    Thanked by 1RickBakkr
  • miumiu Member
    edited May 16

    `--------------------------------------------------------------
    CPU model : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
    Number of cores : 1
    CPU frequency : 3792.874 MHz
    Total size of Disk : 29.0 GB (1.4 GB Used)
    Total amount of Mem : 990 MB (71 MB Used)
    Total amount of Swap : 1023 MB (0 MB Used)
    System uptime : 0 days, 3 hour 1 min
    Load average : 0.33, 0.11, 0.11
    OS : CentOS 7.7.1908
    Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)

    Kernel : 3.10.0-1062.1.1.el7.x86_64

    I/O speed(1st run) : 1.9 GB/s
    I/O speed(2nd run) : 2.1 GB/s
    I/O speed(3rd run) : 2.0 GB/s

    Average I/O speed : 2048.0 MB/s

    Node Name IPv4 address Download Speed
    CacheFly 205.234.175.175 56.4MB/s
    Linode, Tokyo2, JP 139.162.65.37 3.83MB/s
    Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 439KB/s
    Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 47.4MB/s
    Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 40.2MB/s
    Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 4.25MB/s
    Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 5.87MB/s
    Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 5.26MB/s
    Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 2.96MB/s
    Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 4.18MB/s
    Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 375KB/s
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------`
    ``

    my FAVS (random order): Nexus bytes, HostHatch, LetBox, Vultr, BuyVM, HudsonValey, ExtraVM, OVH, Hetzner, CrownCloud, RamNode

    THANKS

  • miumiu Member

    asic System Information:

    Processor : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
    CPU cores : 1 @ 3792.874 MHz
    AES-NI : ❌ Disabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM : 990M
    Swap : 1.0G
    Disk : 29G

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):

    Block Size 4kb (IOPS) 64kb (IOPS)
    Read 66.11 MB/s (16.5k) 330.17 MB/s (5.1k)
    Write 66.26 MB/s (16.5k) 331.91 MB/s (5.1k)
    Total 132.37 MB/s (33.0k) 662.08 MB/s (10.3k)
    Block Size 512kb (IOPS) 1mb (IOPS)
    ------ ----- ---- --- ----
    Read 908.75 MB/s (1.7k) 1.27 GB/s (1.2k)
    Write 957.03 MB/s (1.8k) 1.35 GB/s (1.3k)
    Total 1.86 GB/s (3.6k) 2.62 GB/s (2.5k)

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):

    Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
    | | |
    Bouygues Telecom | Paris, FR (10G) | 488 Mbits/sec | 6.86 Mbits/sec
    Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | 494 Mbits/sec | 441 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream | The Netherlands (10G) | 497 Mbits/sec | 471 Mbits/sec
    wilhelm.tel | Hamburg, DE (10G) | 493 Mbits/sec | 462 Mbits/sec
    Biznet | Bogor, Indonesia (1G) | 215 Mbits/sec | 111 Mbits/sec
    Hostkey | Moscow, RU (1G) | 465 Mbits/sec | 390 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 297 Mbits/sec | 181 Mbits/sec
    Airstream Communications | Eau Claire, WI, US (10G) | 181 Mbits/sec | 73.6 Mbits/sec
    Hurricane Electric | Fremont, CA, US (10G) | 240 Mbits/sec | 159 Mbits/sec

    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 967
    Multi Core | 962

    my FAVS (random order): Nexus bytes, HostHatch, LetBox, Vultr, BuyVM, HudsonValey, ExtraVM, OVH, Hetzner, CrownCloud, RamNode

    THANKS

  • RedSoxRedSox Member
    edited May 16

    I think the most informative tests are:

    1. MonsterBench
      curl -LsO bench.monster/speedtest.sh; bash speedtest.sh -eu
    2. Yet Another Bench Script
      curl -sL yabs.sh | bash
    3. Nench
      (curl -s wget.racing/nench.sh | bash; curl -s wget.racing/nench.sh | bash) 2>&1 | tee nench.log

    But you guys started from the 3rd...

  • What control panel is used?

  • spectraipspectraip Member, Provider

    @codedivine said:
    What control panel is used?

    Virtualizor (with full KVM virtualization).

  • Mahfuz_SS_EHLMahfuz_SS_EHL Member, Provider

    @miu said:
    100 mbit speed limit issue fixed

    Still the speed doesn't seem promising.

    AlphaSSL Revocation Issue is being investigated.

  • spectraipspectraip Member, Provider

    @Mahfuz_SS_EHL said:

    @miu said:
    100 mbit speed limit issue fixed

    Still the speed doesn't seem promising.

    Iperf3 testing on a VPS gives us ± 500 mbps bandwidth.

  • SwiftnodeSwiftnode Member, Provider

    You are kidding right... They are literally a man in the middle - who can see everything passing by... And that coming from someone (supposedly) being a provider...

    @pbx said:

    Swiftnode said: You're not giving cloudflare your personal details. The data would be encrypted.

    as @RickBakkr said, it's encrypted from you to CF and (potentially, you have no way to know) from CF to the backend server. But it has to be unencrypted on CF end. If they wanted, CF could harvest users data. Maybe they do, maybe they don't. But using them when you are an EU provider makes your customer's private information transit through a US company. Sounds a big weird to me: I'd rather connect directly to the provider I decide to trust with my personal information. I understand that CF is useful, easy, cheap, but is that a reason to use them for the most sensitive area of a website? I don't think so.

    As long as the provider is using an SSL certificate on the backend webserver, the only thing cloudflare can harvest is your IP, the ports your connecting to, the size of the encrypted packets, etc. Because the entire session is encrypted.

    And if a provider isn't using SSL on their backend, them using cloudflare is the least of your worries to begin with.

    Cloudflare is horrid.. if I am not enough to convince you, please see: https://iscloudflaresafeyet.com/

    I really hope you aren't serious with this website. Let's look through some of the bullet points listed:

    1. "Falsely advertising their VPN application," it's the same as any other VPN service, of course it passes the data to another provider.

    2. "Cloudflare weakens the security and privacy of encrypted connections" This is addressing the "flexible" SSLs where the backend webserver isn't using HTTPS.

    3. "Cloudflare isn't safe because they run DNS resolvers, nameservers, and domain registration services." This has to be a joke.

    And literally at the bottom of the page, it says

    While this site is a parody, it may contain factual information. :)

    Well, it's factual that cloudflare runs resolvers, nameservers, registrar, NTP servers and VPN servers. At least he got that part right I guess..

    Thanked by 1spectraip
  • spectraipspectraip Member, Provider

    Of course we use a SSL certificate on the backend webserver. We use SSL on both the backend webserver and via CloudFlare.

    Thanked by 1Swiftnode
  • RickBakkrRickBakkr Member, LIR
    edited May 16

    Swiftnode said: As long as the provider is using an SSL certificate on the backend webserver, the only thing cloudflare can harvest is your IP, the ports your connecting to, the size of the encrypted packets, etc. Because the entire session is encrypted.

    Hell no... that would only be possible if Cloudflare proxied raw TCP, which they don't, or they are really gracious with their IPs. They TERMINATE the connection between end user and them and between them and your backend server. The contents of pages are visible to them. So yes: the connections are encrypted: but only between end user and Cloudflare, and between Cloudflare and the backend server. The man in the middle can see everything - including your sensitive data.

    Figure this: if it is all encrypted as per your statement: how do they know what backend to forward to? Usually this is determined by a Host header, but like you said: encrypted. They cannot know any hostname without terminating SSL on their box hence losing the 'security' you meant to gain by applying SSL.

    Swiftnode said: While this site is a parody, it may contain factual information.

    It contains a lot of factual information, just meant as a parody on them trying to scare unknowing internet users about RPKI in the midst of a pandemic. Real smart move, Cloudflare... Rush is very good!!

    --

    That said: we are arguing about something very futile and says more about you than it does about me. Please don't reply sir. Don't spread more wrong information.

    Lucas: very sorry for all of us breaking your thread. You are a great guy, I have known you for quite some time, nothing personal. Just hate to see people advocating a false feeling of safety. Whatever you do with it, is wholly up to you.

    Thanked by 2jsg pbx
  • SwiftnodeSwiftnode Member, Provider
    edited May 16

    @RickBakkr said:

    Swiftnode said: As long as the provider is using an SSL certificate on the backend webserver, the only thing cloudflare can harvest is your IP, the ports your connecting to, the size of the encrypted packets, etc. Because the entire session is encrypted.

    Hell no... that would only be possible if Cloudflare proxied raw TCP, which they don't, or they are really gracious with their IPs. They TERMINATE the connection between end user and them and between them and your backend server. The contents of pages are visible to them. So yes: the connections are encrypted: but only between end user and Cloudflare, and between Cloudflare and the backend server. The man in the middle can see everything - including your sensitive data.
    Figure this: if it is all encrypted as per your statement: how do they know what backend to forward to? Usually this is determined by a Host header, but like you said: encrypted. They cannot know any hostname without terminating SSL on their box hence losing the 'security' you meant to gain by applying SSL.

    https://lmgtfy.com/?q=what+is+server+name+indication

    https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ssl/what-is-sni/

    That said: we are arguing about something very futile and says more about you than it does about me. Please don't reply sir. Don't spread more wrong information.

    Is this really how you act when you link a site that literally says it may contain factual information and someone points it out?

    Their flexible SSL plan is the only thing that operates like you're stating. The Full and Strict SSL modes are end to end encryption.

    https://support.cloudflare.com/hc/en-us/articles/200170416-End-to-end-HTTPS-with-Cloudflare-Part-3-SSL-options#h_845b3d60-9a03-4db0-8de6-20edc5b11057

  • UnixfyUnixfy Member
    edited May 16

    Swiftnode said: As long as the provider is using an SSL certificate on the backend webserver, the only thing cloudflare can harvest is your IP, the ports your connecting to, the size of the encrypted packets, etc. Because the entire session is encrypted.

    If they cannot read the content of your pages.. how do you think things like Rocket Loader, Access, or Apps work? :joy:

    Rick is right.. please try to understand something before asserting that you are right about it.

    Edit: Regarding the site saying it "may" be factual - that doesn't mean the content is not factual. In fact, you can find a lot of resources on the web that back up what the site says.
    After all, Wikipedia has a disclaimer saying that it may not be factual, yet many of us understand it as a fairly reliable source of information, yes?

    Thanked by 1pbx

    me // discord: Unixfy#3061

  • SwiftnodeSwiftnode Member, Provider

    @Unixfy said:
    If they cannot read the content of your pages.. how do you think things like Rocket Loader, Access, or Apps work? :joy:

    Rocket loader caches Javascript, that has nothing to do with debating their end to end encryption on Full SSL modes. They don't need to decrypt the session to cache scripts.

    Edit: Regarding the site saying it "may" be factual - that doesn't mean the content is not factual. In fact, you can find a lot of resources on the web that back up what the site says.
    After all, Wikipedia has a disclaimer saying that it may not be factual, yet many of us understand it as a fairly reliable source of information, yes?

    Wikipedia is community driven sourcing that anyone can edit. The website Rick linked is some guy's personal hatred of Cloudflare. The site he linked is 95% criticizing how large Cloudflare has become and the spread of their services, and 5% talking about the Flexible SSL plan which imho, should never be used for a production site.

    Thanked by 1vimalware
  • tenperatenpera Member

    @spectraip /64 will be auto-given or by ticket?

  • UnixfyUnixfy Member
    edited May 17

    Swiftnode said: Rocket loader caches Javascript, that has nothing to do with debating their end to end encryption on Full SSL modes. They don't need to decrypt the session to cache scripts.

    Rocket loader does not cache JavaScript, that has nothing to do with caching. They do need to decrypt the session to inject the Rocket Loader Javascript.

    Besides, the fact that they serve pages with their own certificate is proof that they can see the decrypted version of a page..

    Think about your logic. What you are saying is that, when you visit a HTTPS page in your browser, you cannot view the page's content.

    Thanked by 1pbx

    me // discord: Unixfy#3061

  • SwiftnodeSwiftnode Member, Provider
    edited May 17

    Think about your logic. What you are saying is that, when you visit a HTTPS page in your browser, you cannot view the page's content.

    None of what you're saying has anything to do with the end-to-end encryption. We weren't arguing about drawing cached page elements (Images/Javascript/Fonts), we were arguing about spying on USER INPUT over an encrypted session.

    the fact that they serve pages with their own SNI certificate is proof that they can see the decrypted version of a page..

    Not even sure what you're talking about with an SNI certificate, SNI allows you to use multiple SSL certificates on a single IP address. There's no "SNI certificate" being shipped by Cloudflare, SNI is an extension of TLS.

    Either way, we've derailed this thread quite a bit, and we're not even arguing the original point of contention anymore.

  • UnixfyUnixfy Member
    edited May 17

    Swiftnode said: None of what you're saying has anything to do with the end-to-end encryption. We weren't arguing about drawing cached page elements (Images/Javascript/Fonts), we were arguing about spying on USER INPUT over an encrypted session.

    So you think it's possible for CF to inject javascript into a page, but they cannot see input on that page?

    Thanked by 1pbx

    me // discord: Unixfy#3061

Sign In or Register to comment.