Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


New Contabo St. Louis Datacenter, Test IP, and Benchmark
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

New Contabo St. Louis Datacenter, Test IP, and Benchmark

dedipromodedipromo Member
edited April 2020 in General

As some may know, Contabo just launched the new St. Louis Datacenter in the US today. Since I have been looking for VPS in STL region for more than three years (check my very first thread https://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/98481/need-vps-in-st-louis-area#latest), I immediately ordered a VPS without any hesitation. Here is the benchmark and test IP.

Test IP: 209.126.0.1

Nench results:

-------------------------------------------------
nench.sh v2019.07.20 -- https://git.io/nench.sh
benchmark timestamp:    2020-04-07 01:06:52 UTC
-------------------------------------------------

Processor:    Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v4 @ 2.20GHz
CPU cores:    4
Frequency:    2199.998 MHz
RAM:          7.8G
Swap:         2.0G
Kernel:       Linux 4.15.0-96-generic x86_64

Disks:
sda    200G  HDD

CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
    4.049 seconds
CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
    6.798 seconds
CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
    2.082 seconds

ioping: seek rate
    min/avg/max/mdev = 39.0 us / 67.5 us / 14.4 ms / 70.9 us
ioping: sequential read speed
    generated 26.6 k requests in 5.00 s, 6.49 GiB, 5.32 k iops, 1.30 GiB/s

dd: sequential write speed
    1st run:    142.10 MiB/s
    2nd run:    102.04 MiB/s
    3rd run:    102.04 MiB/s
    average:    115.39 MiB/s

IPv4 speedtests
    your IPv4:    209.126.0.xxxx

    Cachefly CDN:         23.29 MiB/s
    Leaseweb (NL):        10.75 MiB/s
    Softlayer DAL (US):   13.82 MiB/s
    Online.net (FR):      0.12 MiB/s
    OVH BHS (CA):         8.22 MiB/s

No IPv6 connectivity detected
-------------------------------------------------

Disk I/O was not great considering it's an SSD plan, but acceptable.

Thanked by 1Ympker
«1

Comments

  • Based on other threads on here the I/O is restricted as standard, but it seems you can contact them to have it lifted? Worth a shot.

    Thanked by 2dedipromo Ympker
  • @WSCallum said:
    Based on other threads on here the I/O is restricted as standard, but it seems you can contact them to have it lifted? Worth a shot.

    Thanks man, I'll definitely give it a shot.

  • Besides the dd and the network speeds, performance is a lot better than the PHP-Friends 10GB box I ordered a few weeks ago (same price, same CPU). Now I am really thinking about switching..

    Thanked by 1Ympker
  • MikeAMikeA Member, Patron Provider

    Definitely a good deal, wonder what's up with network speeds, might want to run more tests.

    Thanked by 1Ympker
  • edited April 2020

    Are these dedicated cores?

  • Great location to see! Does anyone know of any providers using or who will be using them?

  • @WSCallum said:
    Based on other threads on here the I/O is restricted as standard, but it seems you can contact them to have it lifted? Worth a shot.

    ^ This. Just open a ticket or msg @contabo_m to get this sorted. SSD speeds then should look like the ones in my signature :)

  • @t0ny0 said:
    Are these dedicated cores?

    According to Contabo it's full KVM.

  • FalzoFalzo Member

    @dedipromo awesome, thanks for the info, I was already on the brink to buy something myself, just for testing.

    could you pretty please run @MasonR s yabs? ( curl -sL yabs.sh | bash )

    Thanked by 1Ympker
  • @Falzo said:
    @dedipromo awesome, thanks for the info, I was already on the brink to buy something myself, just for testing.

    could you pretty please run @MasonR s yabs? ( curl -sL yabs.sh | bash )

    Yes sir.

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2020-02-10                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Tue Apr  7 16:30:39 CEST 2020
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v4 @ 2.20GHz
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 2199.998 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 7.8G
    Swap       : 2.0G
    Disk       : 196G
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4kb           (IOPS) | 64kb          (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 5.30 MB/s     (1.3k) | 65.04 MB/s    (1.0k)
    Write      | 5.32 MB/s     (1.3k) | 65.43 MB/s    (1.0k)
    Total      | 10.62 MB/s    (2.6k) | 130.47 MB/s   (2.0k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512kb         (IOPS) | 1mb           (IOPS)
      ------   | -----          ----  | ---            ----
    Read       | 629.74 MB/s   (1.2k) | 586.07 MB/s    (572)
    Write      | 663.20 MB/s   (1.2k) | 625.10 MB/s    (610)
    Total      | 1.29 GB/s     (2.5k) | 1.21 GB/s     (1.1k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider                  | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                              |                           |                 |       
    Bouygues Telecom          | Paris, FR (10G)           | 179 Mbits/sec   | 191 Mbits/sec
    Online.net                | Paris, FR (10G)           | 183 Mbits/sec   | 190 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream               | The Netherlands (10G)     | busy            | 191 Mbits/sec
    wilhelm.tel               | Hamburg, DE (10G)         | 176 Mbits/sec   | 191 Mbits/sec
    Biznet                    | Bogor, Indonesia (1G)     | 161 Mbits/sec   | 90.1 Mbits/sec
    Hostkey                   | Moscow, RU (1G)           | 177 Mbits/sec   | 137 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online           | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 187 Mbits/sec   | 197 Mbits/sec
    Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Airstream Communications (Attempt #1 of 10).Performing IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Airstream Communications (Attempt #1 of 10Airstream Communications  | Eau Claire, WI, US (10G)  | 192 Mbits/sec   | 199 Mbits/sec
    Hurricane Electric        | Fremont, CA, US (10G)     | 189 Mbits/sec   | 197 Mbits/sec
    
    Performing Geekbench 5 benchmark test. This may take a couple minutes to completGeekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 616
    Multi Core      | 2298
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/1712798
    
    Thanked by 2Matt247 Falzo
  • Not bad. what about uptime?

    Thanked by 1Ympker
  • @popularwidget said:
    Not bad. what about uptime?

    They released it yesterday. Im guessing uptime is currently at 24hrs.

  • @dedipromo said:

    @Falzo said:
    @dedipromo awesome, thanks for the info, I was already on the brink to buy something myself, just for testing.

    could you pretty please run @MasonR s yabs? ( curl -sL yabs.sh | bash )

    Yes sir.

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2020-02-10                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Tue Apr  7 16:30:39 CEST 2020
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v4 @ 2.20GHz
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 2199.998 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 7.8G
    Swap       : 2.0G
    Disk       : 196G
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4kb           (IOPS) | 64kb          (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 5.30 MB/s     (1.3k) | 65.04 MB/s    (1.0k)
    Write      | 5.32 MB/s     (1.3k) | 65.43 MB/s    (1.0k)
    Total      | 10.62 MB/s    (2.6k) | 130.47 MB/s   (2.0k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512kb         (IOPS) | 1mb           (IOPS)
      ------   | -----          ----  | ---            ----
    Read       | 629.74 MB/s   (1.2k) | 586.07 MB/s    (572)
    Write      | 663.20 MB/s   (1.2k) | 625.10 MB/s    (610)
    Total      | 1.29 GB/s     (2.5k) | 1.21 GB/s     (1.1k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider                  | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                              |                           |                 |       
    Bouygues Telecom          | Paris, FR (10G)           | 179 Mbits/sec   | 191 Mbits/sec
    Online.net                | Paris, FR (10G)           | 183 Mbits/sec   | 190 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream               | The Netherlands (10G)     | busy            | 191 Mbits/sec
    wilhelm.tel               | Hamburg, DE (10G)         | 176 Mbits/sec   | 191 Mbits/sec
    Biznet                    | Bogor, Indonesia (1G)     | 161 Mbits/sec   | 90.1 Mbits/sec
    Hostkey                   | Moscow, RU (1G)           | 177 Mbits/sec   | 137 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online           | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 187 Mbits/sec   | 197 Mbits/sec
    Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Airstream Communications (Attempt #1 of 10).Performing IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Airstream Communications (Attempt #1 of 10Airstream Communications  | Eau Claire, WI, US (10G)  | 192 Mbits/sec   | 199 Mbits/sec
    Hurricane Electric        | Fremont, CA, US (10G)     | 189 Mbits/sec   | 197 Mbits/sec
    
    Performing Geekbench 5 benchmark test. This may take a couple minutes to completGeekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 616
    Multi Core      | 2298
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/1712798
    

    Looking good. Thanks :)

    Thanked by 1dedipromo
  • FalzoFalzo Member

    @dedipromo said:

    @Falzo said:
    @dedipromo awesome, thanks for the info, I was already on the brink to buy something myself, just for testing.

    could you pretty please run @MasonR s yabs? ( curl -sL yabs.sh | bash )

    Yes sir.

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2020-02-10                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    

    thanks a lot. looking good I'd say - assume you already got the IO limitation lifted before you ran that? tempted, but sadly no VMX, so no nested virt, might be able to resist for now...

    Thanked by 1Ympker
  • Falzo said:

    dedipromo said:

    Falzo said:
    dedipromo awesome, thanks for the info, I was already on the brink to buy something myself, just for testing.

    could you pretty please run MasonR s yabs? ( curl -sL yabs.sh | bash )

    Yes sir.

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2020-02-10                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    

    thanks a lot. looking good I'd say - assume you already got the IO limitation lifted before you ran that? tempted, but sadly no VMX, so no nested virt, might be able to resist for now...

    Yes, sent them an e-mail and they removed the IO cap in no time.

    Thanked by 2Ympker Falzo
  • dedipromo said: removed

    Can you do another bench now?

  • @Unixfy said:

    dedipromo said: removed

    Can you do another bench now?

    Yes, sir.

    -------------------------------------------------
     nench.sh v2019.07.20 -- https://git.io/nench.sh
     benchmark timestamp:    2020-04-07 18:58:39 UTC
    -------------------------------------------------
    
    Processor:    Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v4 @ 2.20GHz
    CPU cores:    4
    Frequency:    2199.998 MHz
    RAM:          7.8G
    Swap:         2.0G
    Kernel:       Linux 4.15.0-96-generic x86_64
    
    Disks:
    sda    200G  HDD
    
    CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
        4.188 seconds
    CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
        6.679 seconds
    CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
        2.021 seconds
    
    ioping: seek rate
        min/avg/max/mdev = 45.3 us / 76.4 us / 8.79 ms / 61.5 us
    ioping: sequential read speed
        generated 28.5 k requests in 5.00 s, 6.96 GiB, 5.70 k iops, 1.39 GiB/s
    
    dd: sequential write speed
        1st run:    135.42 MiB/s
        2nd run:    545.50 MiB/s
        3rd run:    543.59 MiB/s
        average:    408.17 MiB/s
    
    IPv4 speedtests
        your IPv4:    209.126.0.xxxx
    
        Cachefly CDN:         22.13 MiB/s
        Leaseweb (NL):        17.55 MiB/s
        Softlayer DAL (US):   6.44 MiB/s
        Online.net (FR):      13.83 MiB/s
        OVH BHS (CA):         19.35 MiB/s
    
    No IPv6 connectivity detected
    -------------------------------------------------
    
    Thanked by 1Ympker
  • @dedipromo said:

    @Unixfy said:

    dedipromo said: removed

    Can you do another bench now?

    Yes, sir.

    -------------------------------------------------
     nench.sh v2019.07.20 -- https://git.io/nench.sh
     benchmark timestamp:    2020-04-07 18:58:39 UTC
    -------------------------------------------------
    
    Processor:    Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v4 @ 2.20GHz
    CPU cores:    4
    Frequency:    2199.998 MHz
    RAM:          7.8G
    Swap:         2.0G
    Kernel:       Linux 4.15.0-96-generic x86_64
    
    Disks:
    sda    200G  HDD
    
    CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
        4.188 seconds
    CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
        6.679 seconds
    CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
        2.021 seconds
    
    ioping: seek rate
        min/avg/max/mdev = 45.3 us / 76.4 us / 8.79 ms / 61.5 us
    ioping: sequential read speed
        generated 28.5 k requests in 5.00 s, 6.96 GiB, 5.70 k iops, 1.39 GiB/s
    
    dd: sequential write speed
        1st run:    135.42 MiB/s
        2nd run:    545.50 MiB/s
        3rd run:    543.59 MiB/s
        average:    408.17 MiB/s
    
    IPv4 speedtests
        your IPv4:    209.126.0.xxxx
    
        Cachefly CDN:         22.13 MiB/s
        Leaseweb (NL):        17.55 MiB/s
        Softlayer DAL (US):   6.44 MiB/s
        Online.net (FR):      13.83 MiB/s
        OVH BHS (CA):         19.35 MiB/s
    
    No IPv6 connectivity detected
    -------------------------------------------------
    

    @Falzo bench with the new SSD speeds :P Still not interested? :) Well, if you'd only want it for KVM virtualization it's probably still not gonna work (only LXC I guess) but other than that it's a great deal imho.

  • Read speed seem to be very good. Write speeds not as good though. This is tested through Windows Server 2019.

    Anyone done any bench tests on the write performance on Linux?

  • @dedipromo said:

    @Unixfy said:

    dedipromo said: removed

    Can you do another bench now?

    Yes, sir.

    -------------------------------------------------
     nench.sh v2019.07.20 -- https://git.io/nench.sh
     benchmark timestamp:    2020-04-07 18:58:39 UTC
    -------------------------------------------------
    
    Processor:    Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v4 @ 2.20GHz
    CPU cores:    4
    Frequency:    2199.998 MHz
    RAM:          7.8G
    Swap:         2.0G
    Kernel:       Linux 4.15.0-96-generic x86_64
    
    Disks:
    sda    200G  HDD
    
    CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
        4.188 seconds
    CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
        6.679 seconds
    CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
        2.021 seconds
    
    ioping: seek rate
        min/avg/max/mdev = 45.3 us / 76.4 us / 8.79 ms / 61.5 us
    ioping: sequential read speed
        generated 28.5 k requests in 5.00 s, 6.96 GiB, 5.70 k iops, 1.39 GiB/s
    
    dd: sequential write speed
        1st run:    135.42 MiB/s
        2nd run:    545.50 MiB/s
        3rd run:    543.59 MiB/s
        average:    408.17 MiB/s
    
    IPv4 speedtests
        your IPv4:    209.126.0.xxxx
    
        Cachefly CDN:         22.13 MiB/s
        Leaseweb (NL):        17.55 MiB/s
        Softlayer DAL (US):   6.44 MiB/s
        Online.net (FR):      13.83 MiB/s
        OVH BHS (CA):         19.35 MiB/s
    
    No IPv6 connectivity detected
    -------------------------------------------------
    

    WOW, now the I/O beats my PHP-Friends box too! Impressive...

    Thanked by 1Ympker
  • @Unixfy said:

    @dedipromo said:

    @Unixfy said:

    dedipromo said: removed

    Can you do another bench now?

    Yes, sir.

    -------------------------------------------------
     nench.sh v2019.07.20 -- https://git.io/nench.sh
     benchmark timestamp:    2020-04-07 18:58:39 UTC
    -------------------------------------------------
    
    Processor:    Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v4 @ 2.20GHz
    CPU cores:    4
    Frequency:    2199.998 MHz
    RAM:          7.8G
    Swap:         2.0G
    Kernel:       Linux 4.15.0-96-generic x86_64
    
    Disks:
    sda    200G  HDD
    
    CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
        4.188 seconds
    CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
        6.679 seconds
    CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
        2.021 seconds
    
    ioping: seek rate
        min/avg/max/mdev = 45.3 us / 76.4 us / 8.79 ms / 61.5 us
    ioping: sequential read speed
        generated 28.5 k requests in 5.00 s, 6.96 GiB, 5.70 k iops, 1.39 GiB/s
    
    dd: sequential write speed
        1st run:    135.42 MiB/s
        2nd run:    545.50 MiB/s
        3rd run:    543.59 MiB/s
        average:    408.17 MiB/s
    
    IPv4 speedtests
        your IPv4:    209.126.0.xxxx
    
        Cachefly CDN:         22.13 MiB/s
        Leaseweb (NL):        17.55 MiB/s
        Softlayer DAL (US):   6.44 MiB/s
        Online.net (FR):      13.83 MiB/s
        OVH BHS (CA):         19.35 MiB/s
    
    No IPv6 connectivity detected
    -------------------------------------------------
    

    WOW, now the I/O beats my PHP-Friends box too! Impressive...

    Contabo isn't actually isn't bad imho. Just many ppl saying it is. Of course there is different use cases and I can't speak for everyone but I was quite happy :)

    Thanked by 2Unixfy MissFortune
  • @Unixfy said:

    @dedipromo said:

    @Unixfy said:

    dedipromo said: removed

    Can you do another bench now?

    Yes, sir.

    -------------------------------------------------
     nench.sh v2019.07.20 -- https://git.io/nench.sh
     benchmark timestamp:    2020-04-07 18:58:39 UTC
    -------------------------------------------------
    
    Processor:    Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v4 @ 2.20GHz
    CPU cores:    4
    Frequency:    2199.998 MHz
    RAM:          7.8G
    Swap:         2.0G
    Kernel:       Linux 4.15.0-96-generic x86_64
    
    Disks:
    sda    200G  HDD
    
    CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
        4.188 seconds
    CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
        6.679 seconds
    CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
        2.021 seconds
    
    ioping: seek rate
        min/avg/max/mdev = 45.3 us / 76.4 us / 8.79 ms / 61.5 us
    ioping: sequential read speed
        generated 28.5 k requests in 5.00 s, 6.96 GiB, 5.70 k iops, 1.39 GiB/s
    
    dd: sequential write speed
        1st run:    135.42 MiB/s
        2nd run:    545.50 MiB/s
        3rd run:    543.59 MiB/s
        average:    408.17 MiB/s
    
    IPv4 speedtests
        your IPv4:    209.126.0.xxxx
    
        Cachefly CDN:         22.13 MiB/s
        Leaseweb (NL):        17.55 MiB/s
        Softlayer DAL (US):   6.44 MiB/s
        Online.net (FR):      13.83 MiB/s
        OVH BHS (CA):         19.35 MiB/s
    
    No IPv6 connectivity detected
    -------------------------------------------------
    

    WOW, now the I/O beats my PHP-Friends box too! Impressive...

    I think you’ve got very noisy neighbors on that @PHP_Friends VM of yours. CPU-scores, ioping and dd are a little bit better than this on my Schnupperspecial box.

  • debaser said: I think you’ve got very noisy neighbors on that @PHP_Friends VM of yours. CPU-scores, ioping and dd are a little bit better than this on my Schnupperspecial box.

    Maybe. I am testing on my Frühlingsspecial box. I'm benching my Schnupperspecial box right now.

    Thanked by 1Ympker
  • I tested my PHP-Friends Schnupperspecial and Avoro box. Avoro box (understandably, it has better hardware) performs significantly better than the Contabo box.
    The Schnupperspecial box's I/O is a lot better but the CPU is still substantially worse. I noticed the CPU steal percentage is hovering at around 5-10% as well.

    Thanked by 2Ympker MissFortune
  • @doughnet said:
    Read speed seem to be very good. Write speeds not as good though. This is tested through Windows Server 2019.

    Anyone done any bench tests on the write performance on Linux?

    have you remove the contanbo I/O restriction?

  • @Matt247 said:

    @doughnet said:
    Read speed seem to be very good. Write speeds not as good though. This is tested through Windows Server 2019.

    Anyone done any bench tests on the write performance on Linux?

    have you remove the contanbo I/O restriction?

    how do you go about doing that?

  • @doughnet said:

    @Matt247 said:

    @doughnet said:
    Read speed seem to be very good. Write speeds not as good though. This is tested through Windows Server 2019.

    Anyone done any bench tests on the write performance on Linux?

    have you remove the contanbo I/O restriction?

    how do you go about doing that?

    open a support ticket? would love to see the new bench :)

  • @Matt247 said:

    @doughnet said:

    @Matt247 said:

    @doughnet said:
    Read speed seem to be very good. Write speeds not as good though. This is tested through Windows Server 2019.

    Anyone done any bench tests on the write performance on Linux?

    have you remove the contanbo I/O restriction?

    how do you go about doing that?

    open a support ticket? would love to see the new bench :)

    I sent a support ticket email; see if they do anything.

  • @Matt247 said:

    @doughnet said:
    Read speed seem to be very good. Write speeds not as good though. This is tested through Windows Server 2019.

    Anyone done any bench tests on the write performance on Linux?

    have you remove the contanbo I/O restriction?

    Better but not the best i've seen. For the price point though it's great. I have OpenVPN client connecting to my Untangle router's OpenVPN server. Then block out all incoming with firewall to keep the Windows box safe (:

    Thanked by 1Matt247
  • @doughnet said:

    @Matt247 said:

    @doughnet said:
    Read speed seem to be very good. Write speeds not as good though. This is tested through Windows Server 2019.

    Anyone done any bench tests on the write performance on Linux?

    have you remove the contanbo I/O restriction?

    Better but not the best i've seen. For the price point though it's great. I have OpenVPN client connecting to my Untangle router's OpenVPN server. Then block out all incoming with firewall to keep the Windows box safe (:

    Yea not the best one, 4 core, 8gb ram for that monthly price is a good deal :)

Sign In or Register to comment.