Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


ErrantWeb Expansions - Help us out!
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

ErrantWeb Expansions - Help us out!

SrvisLLCSrvisLLC Member
edited February 2012 in Providers

Hey LET!

I was wondering where would you rather see ErrantWeb expand in?

[-] Metro-Detroit ( we are currently sold-out, however planning on opening for more sales soon )
[-] Kansas City
[-] Dallas/Houston Texas
[-] Other? Let us know in the comments!

Plans may change based on location and supply.
We will be using this thread to see what we should do next and how we can progress further.

Let us know of any location you would rather us expand to.

Comments

  • Dallas.

  • Chicago IL, Jacksonville FL, Miami FL. Dallas/Houston Texas would be nice

  • DerekDerek Member
    edited February 2012

    Toledo, Ohio :)

    http://cisp.com/ - Within driving distance from where your at.

    $0.50/IPv4 and the bandwidth looks very cost effective to what you are charging.

    Thanked by 1Amfy
  • SrvisLLCSrvisLLC Member
    edited February 2012

    @dotvps So far I've only done colocation it is easier if it is US based. However I did say you can post other locations.

    @derek Can you do a tracert ( traceroute ) and a ping to your VPS with us. Id love to know the current latency.

  • A ping from my ISP to my ErrantWeb VPS.

    [laptop@laptop] ping -c 5 -snipped-

    PING -snipped- (-snipped-) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from -snipped-: icmp_req=1 ttl=48 time=25.7 ms
    64 bytes from -snipped-: icmp_req=2 ttl=48 time=28.0 ms
    64 bytes from -snipped-: icmp_req=3 ttl=48 time=58.6 ms
    64 bytes from -snipped-: icmp_req=4 ttl=48 time=41.3 ms
    64 bytes from -snipped-: icmp_req=5 ttl=48 time=26.2 ms

    --- -snipped- ping statistics ---
    5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 20342ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 25.760/36.001/58.637/12.681 ms

    A traceroute from my ISP to my ErrantWeb VPS

    [laptop@laptop] traceroute -snipped-

    traceroute to -snipped- (-snipped-), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
    1 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 5.560 ms 5.913 ms 6.307 ms
    2 -snipped- (-snipped-) 15.210 ms 15.581 ms 18.969 ms
    3 -snipped- (-snipped-) 20.030 ms 19.391 ms 23.639 ms
    4 -snipped- (-snipped-) 48.077 ms 48.480 ms 47.173 ms
    5 te-4-3.car2.Detroit1.Level3.net (4.53.74.101) 31.884 ms 40.900 ms 41.284 ms
    6 WAVEFORM-TE.car2.Detroit1.Level3.net (4.53.74.174) 44.503 ms 22.011 ms 25.215 ms
    7 g2-0.core1.troy2.waveform.net (208.92.220.173) 32.980 ms 33.357 ms 33.753 ms
    8 p0-0-0.agr3.troy2.waveform.net (208.92.220.146) 34.078 ms 34.426 ms 39.808 ms
    9 208.64.36.121 (208.64.36.121) 37.540 ms 37.913 ms 36.723 ms
    10 -snipped- (-snipped-) 38.164 ms 37.379 ms 39.983 ms

    ping from my VPS to cisp.com

    [root@vps ~]# ping -c 5 cisp.com

    PING cisp.com (67.211.172.50) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 67.211.172.50: icmp_seq=1 ttl=120 time=7.85 ms
    64 bytes from 67.211.172.50: icmp_seq=2 ttl=120 time=7.97 ms
    64 bytes from 67.211.172.50: icmp_seq=3 ttl=120 time=8.26 ms
    64 bytes from 67.211.172.50: icmp_seq=4 ttl=120 time=7.73 ms
    64 bytes from 67.211.172.50: icmp_seq=5 ttl=120 time=8.17 ms

    --- cisp.com ping statistics ---
    5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4005ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 7.736/8.000/8.260/0.211 ms

    A traceroute from my VPS to cisp.com

    [root@vps ~]# traceroute cisp.com

    traceroute to cisp.com (67.211.172.50), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
    1 208.64.36.121 (208.64.36.121) 0.077 ms 0.048 ms 0.021 ms
    2 p3-3.core1.troy2.waveform.net (208.92.220.145) 0.396 ms 0.382 ms 0.490 ms
    3 g1-0.edge1.troy2.waveform.net (208.92.220.174) 0.714 ms 0.690 ms 1.065 ms
    4 ge-6-16.car2.Detroit1.Level3.net (4.53.74.173) 14.589 ms 14.718 ms 14.695 ms
    5 COMMUNITY-I.car2.Detroit1.Level3.net (4.53.74.62) 10.310 ms 10.456 ms 10.398 ms
    6 * * *
    7 * * *
    8 * * *
    9 * * *
    10 * * *
    11 * COMMUNITY-I.car2.Detroit1.Level3.net (4.53.74.62) 10.097 ms !X *

  • chicago or kc

  • @ErrantWeb said: [-] Other? Let us know in the comments!

    A place where every other provider isn't.

  • personally yes, I would also +1 to staying and expanding in detroit.

  • I would do Detroit because there's really no other budget VPS provider out there in that location.

  • @Adam said: A place where every other provider isn't.

    No other provider is in Toledo except for Cisp and they start at $75 USD for a VPS.

  • MrDOSMrDOS Member
    edited February 2012

    I'd be interested to see a LEB provider with servers in central or Eastern Canada (anywhere from Ontario to Nova Scotia, really). Then again, it seems pretty much everyone around here is pretty States- or UK-oriented and I'm not sure how you'd drive interest to such locations short of something like seedboxing.

    I'm not terribly familiar with colo options; iWeb in Montreal used to have pretty cheap 1U and 2U plans but it seems they've discontinued that.

  • Dallas
    New York

  • I think Detroit works well for everything east of the Rockies, including Canada. But then again the west coast doesn't ping well to anywhere but itself

  • +1 for Canada

  • prometeusprometeus Member, Host Rep

    @dotvps please admit it, your business is actually to "buy " vps :)

  • Cater to a specific location for one customer, only acquire one customer at an overall loss.

    Go like the big boys: New York, Chicago, Dallas, Kansas City, Phoenix, Denver, LA, Seattle.

  • well, @pdqso
    regardless of where you are in central america, people will still be interested as long as your peering isn't crap.

  • @kbar
    You mean Central US or Central America, like Mexico?

  • Canada, or some Nordic-Europe based VPS

  • @Amfy said: Canada, or some Nordic-Europe based VPS

    This.
    Oh and if it's Canada, Toronto would be nice.

  • sorry, central USA.

    chicago, detroit, KC

  • So does Chicago sound good to everyone?

  • @ErrantWeb: I don't think so, there are already so much hosts there...

  • SrvisLLCSrvisLLC Member
    edited February 2012

    @amfy Well Metro-Detroit will always be our specialty location. I won't be closing down that location or anything. More stock should be open there tonight, and over the next few days.

    Edit: More stock is available now.

  • @Amfy the same cities as "so many hosts" does not mean he has to use the same DC as everyone else. With hosting being so competitive, I'm sure a smaller DC would offer great service, just as great as large DCs, to have ErrantWeb sign up with them.

    @ErrantWeb Atlanta is not as common as it used to be... Ramhost hardly carries stock but I can find some people out of 54 Marriot if I need Atlanta hosting.

  • I vote for Chicago

  • We are going in Chicago for sure.
    We are at Latisys another SAS 70 compliant data-center.
    Plans should be up late ( like 11PM-12AM est ) tonight or tomorrow.

  • SrvisLLCSrvisLLC Member
    edited February 2012

    I don't think they have any servers for rent directly from them, nor do I know anyone that sells any there publicly. I am renting the server & rack space from a friend in Chicago, it is a very high quality server. He's also the one that I got the server in Metro-Detroit from.

Sign In or Register to comment.