New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
online.net silently reducing guaranteed bandwidth
Less than a month ago the 29.99 EUR model used to have 300 Mbit/sec: http://web.archive.org/web/20131010082124/http://www.online.net/fr/serveur-dedie/dedibox-classic
And today it's only 150 Mbit/sec: http://www.online.net/fr/serveur-dedie/dedibox-classic
Did they announce this change anywhere? I don't think they did. And the price remains the same. I wonder if this change is applied to all the existing users as well.
Comments
That's odd.. cause the cheaper dedibox SC still comes with 200Mbit/s
The French are a funny bunch! makes no sense.
Hmm, i used to be hitting 200mb/s easily on my dedibox sc, now both my new and old are not going past 100mb/s
AFAIK, they always limit the outbound speed. They're the first provider in EU which I can't get a full downloading speed from home, even OVH can do that. Depending on the tests I've made from different locations, they limit the outbound speed around 2MB/s per connection thread.
I have no issues ripping 18 M/s single connection from the cheapest model (10EUR) from the US. Multiple connections I can hit 30+ MB/s.
Which provider are you using?
Here's my results from a "Serveur Dedibox SC Large", using vsftpd as the ftp server.
All the client side are mixing of Windows and Linux filezilla versions.
HE Fremont: ~500KB/s (win)
Seflow: ~2.5MB/s (win)
OVH BHS: ~2MB/s (nix)
OVH GRA: ~1.5MB/s (nix)
i3d NL: ~2.5MB/s (nix)
O2 Germany(Home): ~1.5MB/s (win)
As a comparison, here's the result from a mKS2G of OVH located in GRA.
HE Fremont: ~5.5MB/s (win)
Seflow: ~10MB/s (win)
OVH BHS: ~10MB/s (nix)
online.net: ~1.5MB/s (nix)
i3d NL: ~10MB/s (nix)
O2 Germany(Home): ~5MB/s (win)
That's kinda odd for a provider like them.
OVH is much bigger and has tons of traffic available. online.net is more vulnerable to abusers, they might reduce speeds in order to cope.
Or, they might have had local france peerings and most of their traffic was going through there, now with international opening, the situation is probably changed.
I would not trust FTP/filezilla for accurate results. FTP is horrible. My first test was done out of Softlayer WDC.
I am pulling 4 MB/s single thread from home (Ontario, Canada), with multiple connections it maxes my home connection at around 10+ MB/s.
PS: I am doing this testing from their smallest server. I have not tested on my E3.
If ya wanna try from an e3 try
http://fr.evoburst.com
Maybe not accurate, but this kind of difference is not just a accurate problem.
You can see the OVH results, it's far ahead of the online.net ones.
I'm really impressed by your home connection quality.
Just like the ftp tests I've made, lower than 2MB/s from home.
Well I get 50mb/s from my other server in New Jersey.
And 70mb/s from i3d
The Dedibox SC @ DC3
Since I'm on my phone someone send me a link for the benchmark took above and I will run it and post it on my e3 and my e5
wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash
Http://fr.evoburst.com/IMG_1157.png
Was heaps better the other day.. Before It went international -.-
I tried using wget directly from your e3, similar to the ftp results.
HE Fremont: <100k just can't even finish the task.
Seflow: 2013-11-08 04:22:24 (2.21 MB/s) - `100MB.test' saved [100000000/100000000]
OHV BHS: 2013-11-07 22:33:46 (1.50 MB/s) - `100MB.test' saved [100000000/100000000]
OVH GRA: 2013-11-08 04:22:18 (3.15 MB/s) - `100MB.test' saved [100000000/100000000]
i3d NL: 2013-11-08 04:43:22 (2.74 MB/s) - `1000MB.test' saved [1000000000/1000000000]
Home: 2013-11-08 04:33:38 (1.55 MB/s) - `1000MB.test' saved [1000000000/1000000000]
Not better than ftp results at all. :x
Any chance you can run this?
wget mcmyhost.net/benchmark.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash
Interested to see how it compares to OVH.
Running now
Serveur Dedibox SC Large
mKS2G
Maounique is epic.. :P.. Yes it's trippy because i say this before he says anything
use < pre > < /pre>
^^ Cheers
So to be clear, we're talking about poor upload from the server rather than download? Time to do some testing.
download/upload ways from a nano
And
@joodle
maybe they got too much order already?
Not hitting much over 100mbit to the US at any point but honestly I don't expect more than 100mbit consistently in US from France. Pretty happy with it all in all though.
I'm seeing some issues with the route I'm taking to their network.
1.|-- 10.0.1.1 0.0% 10 1.7 2.0 1.2 4.1 0.7 2.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.|-- van58-6-240-201.dynamic.rogerstelecom.net 0.0% 10 11.4 20.9 11.1 102.0 28.5 4.|-- 24.156.157.81 0.0% 10 15.6 14.6 12.5 17.1 1.3 5.|-- 64.71.241.118 0.0% 10 28.7 29.5 27.6 36.0 2.4 6.|-- equinix-6k-1.routers.proxad.net 20.0% 10 33.5 30.2 28.1 33.5 1.5 7.|-- th2-6k-3-po10.intf.routers.proxad.net 0.0% 10 112.6 111.8 110.2 113.3 0.7 8.|-- bzn-crs16-2-be1006.intf.rotuers.proxad.net 0.0% 10 114.7 114.1 112.1 117.5 1.4 9.|-- bzn-crs16-1-be1106.intf.routers.proxad.net 0.0% 10 111.7 112.0 109.8 116.0 1.7 10.|-- dedibox-2-t.intf.routers.proxad.net 0.0% 10 209.6 206.8 195.4 212.1 5.1 11.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.|-- 88.191.1.102 10.0% 10 109.2 110.1 109.2 111.1 0.5 13.|-- 62-210-19x-xxx.rev.poneytelecom.eu 10.0% 10 207.4 205.7 195.1 209.7 5.3
I was getting a steady 110ms over this route till today. 210ms is insane. I'm even seeing some packet loss.
Did @Francisco start a new company?
Haha, I thought the same thing. It seems the French loves ponies too. It's the default rDNS.
Also, it seems to have finally cleared up as soon as I decide to post about it.