Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › Black Friday 2019 - NVMe and Storage (AMS, STO, LAX, NY, CHI, OSL, VIE, ZUR) - Page 7
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Black Friday 2019 - NVMe and Storage (AMS, STO, LAX, NY, CHI, OSL, VIE, ZUR)

1…457910…12

Comments

  • MilonMilon Member
    edited December 2019

    @donli
    @Falzo said:
    which template did you install?
    did you check the vnc console if there is any output?
    did you try another template just to check?

    vnc console show grub rescue.
    Yes, already tried Debian 9 and Ubunty 18.

    there is a notice displayed that some templates might not work with VMs <20GB disk space...

    Not my case if they not delivered me MBs storage instead of TBs :smiley:

  • pincpinc Member

    @Milon said:
    vnc console show grub rescue.
    Yes, already tried Debian 9 and Ubunty 18.

    Just a wild shot - have you checked that you have no ISO mounted and boot order is right?

  • MilonMilon Member

    @Abdullah said:
    Also - not sure if this was already mentioned, if you have a disk size of over 2 TB, please install using an ISO and not a template.

    Thanks, I will try :) Not mentioned before...

    @pinc said:
    Just a wild shot - have you checked that you have no ISO mounted and boot order is right?

    No, no ISO
    Seems problem above... :)

  • mmuyskensmmuyskens Member, Host Rep

    Well look at that, I followed directions, waited 7 days without bothering them, and it was provisioned as promised. Funny how things work out.

    Thanked by 2Trav FrankZ
  • DegeltaDegelta Member

    Got mine as well in Stockholm:

    wget -qO- bench.sh | bash

----------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU model            : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz
Number of cores      : 1
CPU frequency        : 2999.998 MHz
Total size of Disk   : 984.0 GB (2.1 GB Used)
Total amount of Mem  : 987 MB (71 MB Used)
Total amount of Swap : 1023 MB (0 MB Used)
System uptime        : 0 days, 0 hour 7 min
Load average         : 0.07, 0.06, 0.01
OS                   : Debian GNU/Linux 10
Arch                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel               : 4.19.0-6-amd64
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O speed(1st run)   : 822 MB/s
I/O speed(2nd run)   : 692 MB/s
I/O speed(3rd run)   : 726 MB/s
Average I/O speed    : 746.7 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name                       IPv4 address            Download Speed
CacheFly                        205.234.175.175         63.9MB/s      
Linode, Tokyo2, JP              139.162.65.37           7.98MB/s      
Linode, Singapore, SG           139.162.23.4            8.95MB/s      
Linode, London, UK              176.58.107.39           69.1MB/s      
Linode, Frankfurt, DE           139.162.130.8           67.6MB/s      
Linode, Fremont, CA             50.116.14.9             13.8MB/s      
Softlayer, Dallas, TX           173.192.68.18           12.0MB/s      
Softlayer, Seattle, WA          67.228.112.250          9.26MB/s      
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE        159.122.69.4            34.7MB/s      
Softlayer, Singapore, SG        119.81.28.170           9.37MB/s      
Softlayer, HongKong, CN         119.81.130.170          7.15MB/s      
----------------------------------------------------------------------

    curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script/master/yabs.sh | bash
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2019-10-08                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Mon Dec  9 14:32:54 CST 2019

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz
CPU cores  : 1 @ 2999.998 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM        : 987Mi
Swap       : 1.0Gi
Disk       : 984G

Disk Speed Tests:
---------------------------------
       | Test 1      | Test 2      | Test 3      | Avg        
       |             |             |             |            
Write  | 162.00 MB/s | 126.00 MB/s | 101.00 MB/s | 129.67 MB/s
Read   | 224.82 MB/s | 362.67 MB/s | 253.30 MB/s | 280.27 MB/s

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider                  | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed     
                          |                           |                 |                
Bouygues Telecom          | Paris, FR (10G)           | 2.78 Gbits/sec  | 649 Mbits/sec  
Online.net                | Paris, FR (10G)           | busy            | 616 Mbits/sec  
Severius                  | The Netherlands (10G)     | 3.30 Gbits/sec  | 646 Mbits/sec  
Worldstream               | The Netherlands (10G)     | 3.33 Gbits/sec  | 810 Mbits/sec  
wilhelm.tel               | Hamburg, DE (10G)         | 3.19 Gbits/sec  | 731 Mbits/sec  
Biznet                    | Bogor, Indonesia (1G)     | 0.00 bits/sec   | 0.00 bits/sec  
Hostkey                   | Moscow, RU (1G)           | 503 Mbits/sec   | 752 Mbits/sec  
Velocity Online           | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 1.31 Gbits/sec  | 557 Mbits/sec  
Airstream Communications  | Eau Claire, WI, US (10G)  | 1.26 Gbits/sec  | 433 Mbits/sec  
Hurricane Electric        | Fremont, CA, US (10G)     | 0.00 bits/sec   | 176 Mbits/sec  

Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 2697                          
Multi Core      | 2687                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/15017286
  • epaslvepaslv Member
    edited December 2019

    Received, but template only has one option Centos 6.

    Tried ISO and all good now

  • PieHasBeenEatenPieHasBeenEaten Member, Host Rep

    Change the boot order?

  • yolo_meyolo_me Member

    Abdullah said: te: We can do this plan on monthly billing if at least 5 TB storage is bought.

    Note2

    Are the storage ones still available?

    Also, has anybody done a test on the storage servers? Is there limit on the CPU utilization for the storage servers?

  • saintsaint Member

    @epaslv said:
    Received, but template only has one option Centos 6.

    Tried ISO and all good now

    click Change Template

  • dragonfskydragonfsky Member

    Could i enable ipv6 for my server?(LIMITED NVME)

  • tehdartherertehdartherer Member

    Anyone got one in ZUR yet?

  • htgyhtgy Member

    @dragonfsky said:
    Could i enable ipv6 for my server?(LIMITED NVME)

    Just open a ticket, they will enable for you.

  • dragonfskydragonfsky Member

    @Abdullah Could you please look at #569934
    I just want to enable ipv6 :wink:
    Thanks.

  • JabJabJabJab Member

    LET aka ticket system for tickets.

    Thanked by 1bdl
  • dragonfskydragonfsky Member

    @JabJab said:
    LET aka ticket system for tickets.

    lol

  • donlidonli Member

    @dragonfsky said:
    Could i enable ipv6 for my server?(LIMITED NVME)

    They were suppose to have that ability in the panel by now but unfortunately apparently it still requires a ticket to be created.

  • sonicsonic Veteran

    @JabJab said:
    LET aka ticket system for tickets.

    :smiley:

  • Shot2Shot2 Member

    @JabJab said:
    LET aka ticket system for tickets.

    LowEndTickets

  • donlidonli Member

    @Shot2 said:

    @JabJab said:
    LET aka ticket system for tickets.

    LowEndTickets

    LET is the Last rEsorts for Tickets.

  • SgrocksSgrocks Member

    LowEndSupportTIckets

  • yolo_meyolo_me Member

    @Abdullah are you going to make a comeback sale like this for xmas? I missed this and would really love to buy the 84$/year 3TB.

  • poissonpoisson Member
    edited December 2019

    @Falzo said:

    @dragon1993 said:

    speedtest-cli --server 2073
    Hosted by Magyar Telekom Plc. (Budapest) [214.80 km]: 9.014 ms
    Download: 258.95 Mbit/s
    Upload: 844.07 Mbit/s

    speedtest-cli --server 9720
    Hosted by ZNET Telekom Zrt. (Gyor) [111.31 km]: 24.279 ms
    Download: 55.66 Mbit/s
    Upload: 198.26 Mbit/s

    speedtest-cli --server 8384
    Hosted by Tarr Ltd. (Zalaegerszeg) [155.24 km]: 32.027 ms
    Download: 139.78 Mbit/s
    Upload: 263.84 Mbit/s

    speedtest-cli --server 3715
    Hosted by Digi Kft (Budapest) [234.17 km]: 15.644 ms
    Download: 198.70 Mbit/s
    Upload: 553.11 Mbit/s

    speedtest-cli --server 1697
    Hosted by Telenor Hungary (Budapest) [214.80 km]: 174.201 ms
    Download: 270.79 Mbit/s
    Upload: 211.38 Mbit/s

    My experience with speedtest-cli is that the deviation is too great from the web version. Not sure how reliable speedtest is.

  • NobodyInterestingNobodyInteresting Member

    @poisson said:

    @Falzo said:

    @dragon1993 said:

    speedtest-cli --server 2073
    Hosted by Magyar Telekom Plc. (Budapest) [214.80 km]: 9.014 ms
    Download: 258.95 Mbit/s
    Upload: 844.07 Mbit/s

    speedtest-cli --server 9720
    Hosted by ZNET Telekom Zrt. (Gyor) [111.31 km]: 24.279 ms
    Download: 55.66 Mbit/s
    Upload: 198.26 Mbit/s

    speedtest-cli --server 8384
    Hosted by Tarr Ltd. (Zalaegerszeg) [155.24 km]: 32.027 ms
    Download: 139.78 Mbit/s
    Upload: 263.84 Mbit/s

    speedtest-cli --server 3715
    Hosted by Digi Kft (Budapest) [234.17 km]: 15.644 ms
    Download: 198.70 Mbit/s
    Upload: 553.11 Mbit/s

    speedtest-cli --server 1697
    Hosted by Telenor Hungary (Budapest) [214.80 km]: 174.201 ms
    Download: 270.79 Mbit/s
    Upload: 211.38 Mbit/s

    My experience with speedtest-cli is that the deviation is too great from the web version. Not sure how reliable speedtest is.

    Have you tried the official one by ookla?
    https://www.speedtest.net/apps/cli

    Thanked by 1dosai
  • poissonpoisson Member

    @t0ny0 said:
    Have you tried the official one by ookla?
    https://www.speedtest.net/apps/cli

    Thanks for sharing. Let me run some tests. I like their server network but the previous non-official cli script didn't work well for me.

  • NobodyInterestingNobodyInteresting Member

    @poisson said:

    @t0ny0 said:
    Have you tried the official one by ookla?
    https://www.speedtest.net/apps/cli

    Thanks for sharing. Let me run some tests. I like their server network but the previous non-official cli script didn't work well for me.

    Oh yeah, the non-official one kept giving me up to 5Mbps upload no matter what.

  • KenobisVPSKenobisVPS Member

    1GB LA one I got:

     Benchmark started on 11-Dec-2019 23:53:06

 ## System Information

 OS Name     : CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 (Core) N (64 bit)
 Kernel      : KVM / 3.10.0-1062.9.1.el7.x86_64
 Hostname    : server
 CPU Model   : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz
 CPU Cores   : 1 core @  2799.998 MHz
 CPU Cache   : 25600 KB
 Total RAM   : 990 MiB (Free 693 MiB)
 Total SWAP  : 1151 MiB (Free 1149MiB)
 Total Space : 11GB (33% used)
 Running for : 3days - 22hrs 53min 15sec


 ## CDN Speedtest

 CacheFly :  93.87 MiB/s |  750.92 Mbps  | ping   0.312ms
 Gdrive   :  64.99 MiB/s |  519.94 Mbps  | ping   9.734ms


 ## North America Speedtest

 Softlayer, Washington, USA :  14.54 MiB/s |  116.31 Mbps  | ping  62.012ms
 SoftLayer, San Jose, USA   :  77.16 MiB/s |  617.31 Mbps  | ping  11.639ms
 SoftLayer, Dallas, USA     :       0 B/s |      N/A       | ping error!
 Vultr, New Jersey, USA     :  33.08 MiB/s |  264.64 Mbps  | ping  68.111ms
 Vultr, Seattle, USA        :  80.89 MiB/s |  647.16 Mbps  | ping  25.802ms
 Vultr, Dallas, USA         :  65.82 MiB/s |  526.52 Mbps  | ping  33.687ms
 Vultr, Los Angeles, USA    : 102.92 MiB/s |  823.35 Mbps  | ping   0.340ms
 Ramnode, New York, USA     :  37.92 MiB/s |  303.32 Mbps  | ping  60.506ms
 Ramnode, Atlanta, USA      :  41.20 MiB/s |  329.61 Mbps  | ping  45.577ms
 OVH, Beauharnois, Canada   :   5.98 MiB/s |   47.85 Mbps  | ping  71.094ms


 ## Europe Speedtest

 Vultr, London, UK            :  14.58 MiB/s |  116.62 Mbps  | ping 133.421ms
 LeaseWeb, Frankfurt, Germany :  11.33 MiB/s |   90.62 Mbps  | ping 146.019ms
 Hetzner, Germany             :  11.00 MiB/s |   88.01 Mbps  | ping 155.413ms
 Ramnode, Alblasserdam, NL    :   4.17 MiB/s |   33.40 Mbps  | ping 134.444ms
 Vultr, Amsterdam, NL         :  12.12 MiB/s |   96.96 Mbps  | ping 138.619ms
 EDIS, Stockholm, Sweden      :     316 B/s |      N/A       | ping 162.435ms
 OVH, Roubaix, France         :   8.41 MiB/s |   67.28 Mbps  | ping 152.229ms
 Online, France               :  12.74 MiB/s |  101.94 Mbps  | ping 148.478ms
 Prometeus, Milan, Italy      :       0 B/s |      N/A       | ping 153.436ms


 ## Exotic Speedtest

 Sydney, Australia     :  10.43 MiB/s |   83.43 Mbps  | ping 144.980ms
 Lagoon, New Caledonia :  10.86 MiB/s |   86.85 Mbps  | ping 167.805ms
 Hosteasy, Moldova     :   3.90 MiB/s |   31.20 Mbps  | ping 174.799ms
 Prima, Argentina      : 493.16 KiB/s |    3.85 Mbps  | ping error!


 ## Asia Speedtest

 SoftLayer, Singapore :   1.44 MiB/s |   11.53 Mbps  | ping 176.564ms
 Linode, Tokyo, Japan :  20.54 MiB/s |  164.30 Mbps  | ping 109.486ms
 Linode, Singapore    :   9.78 MiB/s |   78.25 Mbps  | ping 168.101ms
 Vultr, Tokyo, Japan  :  19.10 MiB/s |  152.80 Mbps  | ping 108.943ms


 ## IO Test

 CPU Speed:
    bzip2 512MB - bzip2 not found on system.
   sha256 512MB -   258 MB/s
   md5sum 512MB -   450 MB/s

 Disk Speed (512MB):
   I/O Speed  - 563 MB/s
   I/O Direct - 94.8 MB/s

 RAM Speed (495MB):
   Avg. write - 2355.2 MB/s
   Avg. read  - 5563.7 MB/s

 Benchmark finished in 114 seconds
   results saved on /root/bench.log
  • dosaidosai Member

    @t0ny0 said:

    @poisson said:

    @Falzo said:

    @dragon1993 said:

    speedtest-cli --server 2073
    Hosted by Magyar Telekom Plc. (Budapest) [214.80 km]: 9.014 ms
    Download: 258.95 Mbit/s
    Upload: 844.07 Mbit/s

    speedtest-cli --server 9720
    Hosted by ZNET Telekom Zrt. (Gyor) [111.31 km]: 24.279 ms
    Download: 55.66 Mbit/s
    Upload: 198.26 Mbit/s

    speedtest-cli --server 8384
    Hosted by Tarr Ltd. (Zalaegerszeg) [155.24 km]: 32.027 ms
    Download: 139.78 Mbit/s
    Upload: 263.84 Mbit/s

    speedtest-cli --server 3715
    Hosted by Digi Kft (Budapest) [234.17 km]: 15.644 ms
    Download: 198.70 Mbit/s
    Upload: 553.11 Mbit/s

    speedtest-cli --server 1697
    Hosted by Telenor Hungary (Budapest) [214.80 km]: 174.201 ms
    Download: 270.79 Mbit/s
    Upload: 211.38 Mbit/s

    My experience with speedtest-cli is that the deviation is too great from the web version. Not sure how reliable speedtest is.

    Have you tried the official one by ookla?
    https://www.speedtest.net/apps/cli

    TIL and it works well.

    Thanked by 1NobodyInteresting
  • tgltgl Member
    edited December 2019

    i would suggest to stop using speedtest, its a very bad way to measure speed, the only good way is to use a free iperf server, if thats not available, try an unused mirror/test file and download a large file from there, or a wget from cachefly, the rest is just fake results, you can imagine these servers are overused by many people and many of the providers are limiting the bandwidth, even if you try 10 speedtest-cli servers you will still end up with a bad result

  • dosaidosai Member

    @tgl said:
    i would suggest to stop using speedtest, its a very bad way to measure speed, the only good way is to use a free iperf server, if thats not available, try an unused mirror/test file and download a large file from there, or a wget from cachefly, the rest is just fake results, you can imagine these servers are overused by many people and many of the providers are limiting the bandwidth, even if you try 10 speedtest-cli servers you will still end up with a bad result

    Agreed, but very limited public iperf servers are available compared to speedtest list.

    Thanked by 1K4Y5
  • poissonpoisson Member

    The official one seems better but having set up a bunch of personal iperf servers, I think iperf is still the way to go. The variance for speed-test, even the official cli version, is still way too inconsistent. iperf is remarkably consistent when you do like 3-5 tests in a row.

    Thanked by 1uptime
Sign In or Register to comment.