Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


$0.00 KVM VPS - 4GB RAM, 4 vCPU cores, Gbps Port, DDoS Protection - Details inside - Page 3
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

$0.00 KVM VPS - 4GB RAM, 4 vCPU cores, Gbps Port, DDoS Protection - Details inside

1356

Comments

  • @poisson said:

    @dahartigan said:
    I plan to do a review after another month or so of using it, but so far it has been quite good. I haven't had to deal with support at all and the server has been very stable. I have my server deployed in Sydney on OVH network, and had zero problems. So it doesn't idle I've got 3cx installed which we use at home for our voip.

    Definitely not oversold junk, in fact I suspect there aren't many other users at least on my node.

    Seems honest to me. I was never asked to do anything special or dodgy. I believe they are trying to get their name out more and are offering a decent server in return.

    I understand it's difficult for me to say this and appear neutral, but it's true.

    I am looking forward to your benches and it will be of a great help in deciding whether I should whitelist them. I have been waiting for more independent data points to appear for a while. :)

    I would be willing to sign off on that, the potassium is premium indeed. Not your typical LET pricing, but it's definitely good value. There are a lot of locations, and I'm only on Sydney.

    Here's a bench.sh as it stands right now:

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    CPU model            : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1245 v5 @ 3.50GHz
    Number of cores      : 3
    CPU frequency        : 3504.008 MHz
    Total size of Disk   : 59.0 GB (54.0 GB Used)
    Total amount of Mem  : 3001 MB (665 MB Used)
    Total amount of Swap : 1023 MB (0 MB Used)
    System uptime        : 0 days, 5 hour 35 min
    Load average         : 0.10, 0.13, 0.09
    OS                   : Debian GNU/Linux 9
    Arch                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
    Kernel               : 4.15.18-21-pve
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    I/O speed(1st run)   : 190 MB/s
    I/O speed(2nd run)   : 214 MB/s
    I/O speed(3rd run)   : 249 MB/s
    Average I/O speed    : 217.7 MB/s
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Node Name                       IPv4 address            Download Speed
    CacheFly                        204.93.143.143          64.0MB/s
    Linode, Tokyo2, JP              139.162.65.37           14.5MB/s
    Linode, Singapore, SG           139.162.23.4            22.2MB/s
    Linode, London, UK              176.58.107.39           8.87MB/s
    Linode, Frankfurt, DE           139.162.130.8           8.98MB/s
    Linode, Fremont, CA             50.116.14.9             10.5MB/s
    Softlayer, Dallas, TX           173.192.68.18           6.89MB/s
    Softlayer, Seattle, WA          67.228.112.250          6.05MB/s
    Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE        159.122.69.4            6.26MB/s
    Softlayer, Singapore, SG        119.81.28.170           14.4MB/s
    Softlayer, HongKong, CN         119.81.130.170          11.7MB/s
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Thanked by 2poisson uptime
  • @dahartigan Love those APAC speeds. Their pricing probably isn't going to resonate with the low end market but if the currency is in AUD I think they will sell like hot cakes.

  • @poisson said:
    @dahartigan Love those APAC speeds. Their pricing probably isn't going to resonate with the low end market but if the currency is in AUD I think they will sell like hot cakes.

    This is higher-end low-end, mid-range pricing. Premium enough to not be oversold, affordable enough to buy.

  • @dahartigan said:

    @poisson said:
    @dahartigan Love those APAC speeds. Their pricing probably isn't going to resonate with the low end market but if the currency is in AUD I think they will sell like hot cakes.

    This is higher-end low-end, mid-range pricing. Premium enough to not be oversold, affordable enough to buy.

    Fair enough. You do have to increase pricing a bit act as a firewall filtering malicious users.

  • dahartigandahartigan Member
    edited November 2019

    @poisson said:

    @dahartigan said:

    @poisson said:
    @dahartigan Love those APAC speeds. Their pricing probably isn't going to resonate with the low end market but if the currency is in AUD I think they will sell like hot cakes.

    This is higher-end low-end, mid-range pricing. Premium enough to not be oversold, affordable enough to buy.

    Fair enough. You do have to increase pricing a bit act as a firewall filtering malicious users.

    Premium is premium for a reason :-) The catch is premium must be something better, even if it's just exclusivity or a brand.

    Sustainable pricing is important. Don't get me wrong, I love a great cheap deal like the next LETer but some projects require the good silverware, the good exothermic potassium, so to speak.

    Are we dealing with exothermic potassium here? Possibly, I haven't exposed it to water yet...

  • EvolutionHostEvolutionHost Member, Host Rep

    It would certainly be a fair analysis that our packages come at slightly more of a premium. However as dahar has accurately pointed out this is because we are providing a more reliable service without relying on over-selling machines.

    We've been around a long time and plan to be around even longer - sustainable pricing is essential for this.

    With this particular offer, we're giving the chance for anybody with a prominent website or a frequent poster on LET the chance for a free VPS that is of the highest quality. The only thing better than a cheap VPS is a free enterprise grade VPS.

    Thanked by 1dahartigan
  • poissonpoisson Member
    edited December 2019

    @EvolutionHost said:
    It would certainly be a fair analysis that our packages come at slightly more of a premium. However as dahar has accurately pointed out this is because we are providing a more reliable service without relying on over-selling machines.

    We've been around a long time and plan to be around even longer - sustainable pricing is essential for this.

    With this particular offer, we're giving the chance for anybody with a prominent website or a frequent poster on LET the chance for a free VPS that is of the highest quality. The only thing better than a cheap VPS is a free enterprise grade VPS.

    Well, that is most certainly a model I can agree with. Pay peanuts, expect monkeys is what I observe happening most of the time, so please continue the sustainable model!

    However, I think the free premium potassium VPS for links isn't a very good idea unless accompanied by quality content. Google doesn't seem to bother too much about link quantity and may even penalise if they detect link trading.

    As @deank rightfully pointed out somewhere (I can't remember where), you want word-of-mouth from people, which naturally translates into better SEO over time (and you don't have to spend time and money scheming about it) as you receive constant flow of high quality writings endorsing your service by many people who enjoy your service.

    Being an active participant on the popular forums is a much better way to improve sales without having to do link trading (make that a bonus). Google means little to me compared to say @dahartigan's honest words about his experience with your services. I would say let that link part come naturally (it seems to me that some people on the forum were a bit put off by that pitch even though you probably don't mean it in any nefarious way). Perhaps you can reach out to opinion leaders on hosting forums or ask your existing supporters to suggest other opinion leaders to give a free VPS to.

    I don't mean to be overbearing but I trust @dahartigan's words so I don't want an excellent provider to shot himself in the foot unnecessarily. :)

    Thanked by 1dahartigan
  • deankdeank Member, Troll

    The first change I'd make is stop using "we". Just say "I".

    Thanked by 1webclouddev
  • Should have put out a banging deal on Black Friday.

    Self-labeled "opinion leaders" wont change the tide around here.

  • @corbpie said:
    Should have put out a banging deal on Black Friday.

    Self-labeled "opinion leaders" wont change the tide around here.

    Prophecies from self-banging scolds. :)

    Thanked by 1dahartigan
  • Fantastic smart marketing operation, I wish you all the success you deserve!
    Indeed, I hope that my request for my community with its 320,884 members will catch your attention ;)

  • EvolutionHostEvolutionHost Member, Host Rep

    Thanks everyone for the kind words & suggestions. We look forward to working with those of you who have applied!

  • okcgregokcgreg Member
    edited December 2019

    I applied for this VPS deal either the day of or the next day of the OP and it's a legit deal! I haven't had any issues with the connectivity or anything whatsoever.

  • @okcgreg said:
    I applied for this VPS deal either the day of or the next day of the OP and it's a legit deal! I haven't had any issues with the connectivity or anything whatsoever.

    There's absolutely no question that this is a legit deal, and quite generous too I think. I noticed that this has been posted before, so it's been an ongoing campaign for a while now. I'd encourage anyone who qualifies to reach out to them.

    I'm planning to do something for the LET community shortly with the VPS I have been sponsored to give something for December ;)

  • poissonpoisson Member
    edited December 2019

    @dahartigan said:

    @okcgreg said:
    I applied for this VPS deal either the day of or the next day of the OP and it's a legit deal! I haven't had any issues with the connectivity or anything whatsoever.

    There's absolutely no question that this is a legit deal, and quite generous too I think. I noticed that this has been posted before, so it's been an ongoing campaign for a while now. I'd encourage anyone who qualifies to reach out to them.

    I'm planning to do something for the LET community shortly with the VPS I have been sponsored to give something for December ;)

    Mind running your latest favourite script on this (the benchmonster speedtest)? I am curious about how it compares with your SmartHost plex vps.

  • poisson said: Mind running your latest favourite script on this (the benchmonster speedtest)? I am curious about how it compares with your SmartHost plex vps.

    Good thinking 99, I'll report back when it's finished :)

  • ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Speedtest Monster v.1.4.6 2019-10-29
     Region: Global  https://bench.monster/speedtest.html
     Usage : curl -LsO bench.monster/speedtest.sh; bash speedtest.sh -Global
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     OS           : Debian GNU/Linux 9 (64 Bit)
     Virt/Kernel  : KVM / 4.15.18-21-pve
     CPU Model    : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1245 v5 @ 3.50GHz
     CPU Cores    : 3 @ 3504.008 MHz x86_64 4096 KB Cache
     CPU Flags    : AES-NI Enabled & VM-x/AMD-V Enabled
     Load Average : 0.58, 0.59, 0.54
     Total Space  : 59G (54G ~98% used)
     Total RAM    : 920 MB / 3001 MB (1931 MB Buff)
     Total SWAP   : 366 MB / 1023 MB
     Uptime       : 2 days 22:10
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     ASN & ISP    : AS16276, OVH Australia PTY LTD
     Organization :
     Location     : Lancaster, United States / US
     Region       : California
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
     ## Geekbench v4 CPU Benchmark:
    
      Single Core : 1974  (FAIR)
       Multi Core : 2427
    
     ## IO Test
    
     CPU Speed:
        bzip2     :  30.7 MB/s
       sha256     :  78.6 MB/s
       md5sum     : 215 MB/s
    
     RAM Speed:
       Avg. write : 1706.7 MB/s
       Avg. read  : 2525.9 MB/s
    
     Disk Speed:
       1st run    : 197 MB/s
       2nd run    : 203 MB/s
       3rd run    : 234 MB/s
       -----------------------
       Average    : 211.3 MB/s
    
     ## Global Speedtest
    
     Location                       Upload           Download         Ping
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Speedtest.net                  0.52 Mbit/s      0.46 Mbit/s      3.431 ms
     USA, Chicago (Windstream)      0.00 Mbit/s      0.41 Mbit/s     232.615 ms
     UK, London (Community Fibre)   0.00 Mbit/s      0.36 Mbit/s     235.348 ms
     Germany, Berlin (DNS:NET)      0.46 Mbit/s      0.21 Mbit/s     291.341 ms
     Italy, Rome (Unidata)          0.26 Mbit/s      0.12 Mbit/s     273.459 ms
     Russia, Moscow (MTS)           0.26 Mbit/s      0.16 Mbit/s     276.618 ms
     India, New Delhi (Airtel)      0.26 Mbit/s      0.25 Mbit/s     157.528 ms
     Japan, Tsukuba (SoftEther)     0.26 Mbit/s      0.25 Mbit/s     161.397 ms
     Australia, Sydney (Yes Optus)  0.00 Mbit/s      0.08 Mbit/s       2.098 ms
     RSA, Randburg (Cool Ideas)     0.00 Mbit/s      0.05 Mbit/s     441.871 ms
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
     Finished in : 34 min 12 sec
     Timestamp   : 2019-12-03 03:48:41 GMT
     Saved in    : /root/speedtest.log
    
     Share results:
     - http://www.speedtest.net/result/8817600275.png
     - https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/14992179
     - https://clbin.com/Vv3BS
    

    Not sure what is with those network results though, it seems awfully slow. Perhaps there's some network congestion or something. You can see in my earlier bench.sh what the speed should look like.

    @poisson

    Thanked by 1uptime
  • emailed. lets see what they have.

  • Ok I applied for a free VPS yesterday and they were very quick to reply. Even though I don't qualify because I dont have a website but I have plan to make one in near future. I explained my use case and plan to them and they were kind enough to give me Developer VPS free.
    Very excited to put it to good use soon.

    Thanked by 2dahartigan yoursunny
  • @alilet said:
    Ok I applied for a free VPS yesterday and they were very quick to reply. Even though I don't qualify because I dont have a website but I have plan to make one in near future. I explained my use case and plan to them and they were kind enough to give me Developer VPS free.
    Very excited to put it to good use soon.

    That's pretty awesome :-)

    Thanked by 1alilet
  • @dahartigan said:
    Not sure what is with those network results though, it seems awfully slow. Perhaps there's some network congestion or something. You can see in my earlier bench.sh what the speed should look like.

    I am not getting the multicore Geekbench score too. It should be much higher than a single core considering there are 3.

    Thanked by 1dahartigan
  • @poisson said:

    @dahartigan said:
    Not sure what is with those network results though, it seems awfully slow. Perhaps there's some network congestion or something. You can see in my earlier bench.sh what the speed should look like.

    I am not getting the multicore Geekbench score too. It should be much higher than a single core considering there are 3.

    I could probably try running it again later, after a reboot or something maybe. Would be curious to see if @alilet could test on his VPS?

  • @dahartigan said:

    @poisson said:

    @dahartigan said:
    Not sure what is with those network results though, it seems awfully slow. Perhaps there's some network congestion or something. You can see in my earlier bench.sh what the speed should look like.

    I am not getting the multicore Geekbench score too. It should be much higher than a single core considering there are 3.

    I could probably try running it again later, after a reboot or something maybe. Would be curious to see if @alilet could test on his VPS?

    Here's my 2 core, 2GB, London VPS bench. Everything is perfect except the network. Tagging @EvolutionHost as he may need to tweak some setting.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Speedtest Monster v.1.4.6 2019-10-29
     Region: Global  https://bench.monster/speedtest.html
     Usage : curl -LsO bench.monster/speedtest.sh; bash speedtest.sh -Global
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     OS           : Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS (64 Bit)
     Virt/Kernel  : KVM / 4.15.0-22-generic
     CPU Model    : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 v6 @ 3.80GHz
     CPU Cores    : 2 @ 3792.016 MHz x86_64 4096 KB Cache
     CPU Flags    : AES-NI Enabled & VM-x/AMD-V Enabled
     Load Average : 0.16, 0.37, 0.21
     Total Space  : 39G (2.0G ~6% used)
     Total RAM    : 70 MB / 1993 MB (1549 MB Buff)
     Total SWAP   : 0 MB / 1023 MB
     Uptime       : 0 days 1:28
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     ASN & ISP    : AS16276, OVH SAS
     Organization : Phillipson Owen
     Location     : London, United Kingdom / GB
     Region       : England
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
     ## Geekbench v4 CPU Benchmark:
    
      Single Core : 4255  (EXCELLENT)
       Multi Core : 6627
    
     ## IO Test
    
     CPU Speed:
        bzip2     : 102 MB/s
       sha256     : 196 MB/s
       md5sum     : 488 MB/s
    
     RAM Speed:
       Avg. write : 3345.1 MB/s
       Avg. read  : 6246.4 MB/s
    
     Disk Speed:
       1st run    : 424 MB/s
       2nd run    : 435 MB/s
       3rd run    : 418 MB/s
       -----------------------
       Average    : 425.7 MB/s
    
     ## Global Speedtest
    
     Location                       Upload           Download         Ping
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Speedtest.net                  0.29 Mbit/s      0.73 Mbit/s     * 851.376 ms
     USA, New York (AT&T)           0.30 Mbit/s      0.31 Mbit/s      78.511 ms
     USA, Dallas (Frontier)         0.88 Mbit/s      0.14 Mbit/s     113.449 ms
     USA, Miami (Frontier)          0.84 Mbit/s      0.33 Mbit/s     109.976 ms
     USA, Los Angeles (Spectrum)    0.59 Mbit/s      0.21 Mbit/s     156.723 ms
     UK, London (Community Fibre)   0.52 Mbit/s      0.42 Mbit/s       0.836 ms
     France, Lyon (SFR)             0.57 Mbit/s      0.34 Mbit/s      18.735 ms
     Germany, Berlin (DNS:NET)      0.52 Mbit/s      0.64 Mbit/s      25.856 ms
     Spain, Madrid (Adamo)          0.17 Mbit/s      0.53 Mbit/s      23.142 ms
     Italy, Rome (Unidata)          0.44 Mbit/s      0.42 Mbit/s      45.691 ms
     Russia, Moscow (MTS)           0.29 Mbit/s      0.42 Mbit/s      49.215 ms
     Israel, Haifa (013Netvision)   0.44 Mbit/s      0.20 Mbit/s      66.905 ms
     India, New Delhi (Airtel)      0.65 Mbit/s      0.16 Mbit/s     150.603 ms
     Singapore (FirstMedia)         0.65 Mbit/s      0.27 Mbit/s     315.745 ms
     Japan, Tsukuba (SoftEther)     0.87 Mbit/s      0.87 Mbit/s     245.426 ms
     Australia, Sydney (Yes Optus)  0.65 Mbit/s      0.96 Mbit/s     305.003 ms
     Brazil, Sao Paulo (Criare)     0.88 Mbit/s      0.52 Mbit/s     204.744 ms
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
     Finished in : 23 min 9 sec
     Timestamp   : 2019-12-03 11:19:15 GMT
     Saved in    : /root/speedtest.log
    
     Share results:
     - http://www.speedtest.net/result/8818545380.png
     - https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/14993364
     - https://clbin.com/7HrcR
    
    Thanked by 2dahartigan uptime
  • @alilet said:

    @dahartigan said:

    @poisson said:

    @dahartigan said:
    Not sure what is with those network results though, it seems awfully slow. Perhaps there's some network congestion or something. You can see in my earlier bench.sh what the speed should look like.

    I am not getting the multicore Geekbench score too. It should be much higher than a single core considering there are 3.

    I could probably try running it again later, after a reboot or something maybe. Would be curious to see if @alilet could test on his VPS?

    Here's my 2 core, 2GB, London VPS bench. Everything is perfect except the network. Tagging @EvolutionHost as he may need to tweak some setting.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Speedtest Monster v.1.4.6 2019-10-29
     Region: Global  https://bench.monster/speedtest.html
     Usage : curl -LsO bench.monster/speedtest.sh; bash speedtest.sh -Global
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     OS           : Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS (64 Bit)
     Virt/Kernel  : KVM / 4.15.0-22-generic
     CPU Model    : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 v6 @ 3.80GHz
     CPU Cores    : 2 @ 3792.016 MHz x86_64 4096 KB Cache
     CPU Flags    : AES-NI Enabled & VM-x/AMD-V Enabled
     Load Average : 0.16, 0.37, 0.21
     Total Space  : 39G (2.0G ~6% used)
     Total RAM    : 70 MB / 1993 MB (1549 MB Buff)
     Total SWAP   : 0 MB / 1023 MB
     Uptime       : 0 days 1:28
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     ASN & ISP    : AS16276, OVH SAS
     Organization : Phillipson Owen
     Location     : London, United Kingdom / GB
     Region       : England
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
     ## Geekbench v4 CPU Benchmark:
    
      Single Core : 4255  (EXCELLENT)
       Multi Core : 6627
    
     ## IO Test
    
     CPU Speed:
        bzip2     : 102 MB/s
       sha256     : 196 MB/s
       md5sum     : 488 MB/s
    
     RAM Speed:
       Avg. write : 3345.1 MB/s
       Avg. read  : 6246.4 MB/s
    
     Disk Speed:
       1st run    : 424 MB/s
       2nd run    : 435 MB/s
       3rd run    : 418 MB/s
       -----------------------
       Average    : 425.7 MB/s
    
     ## Global Speedtest
    
     Location                       Upload           Download         Ping
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Speedtest.net                  0.29 Mbit/s      0.73 Mbit/s     * 851.376 ms
     USA, New York (AT&T)           0.30 Mbit/s      0.31 Mbit/s      78.511 ms
     USA, Dallas (Frontier)         0.88 Mbit/s      0.14 Mbit/s     113.449 ms
     USA, Miami (Frontier)          0.84 Mbit/s      0.33 Mbit/s     109.976 ms
     USA, Los Angeles (Spectrum)    0.59 Mbit/s      0.21 Mbit/s     156.723 ms
     UK, London (Community Fibre)   0.52 Mbit/s      0.42 Mbit/s       0.836 ms
     France, Lyon (SFR)             0.57 Mbit/s      0.34 Mbit/s      18.735 ms
     Germany, Berlin (DNS:NET)      0.52 Mbit/s      0.64 Mbit/s      25.856 ms
     Spain, Madrid (Adamo)          0.17 Mbit/s      0.53 Mbit/s      23.142 ms
     Italy, Rome (Unidata)          0.44 Mbit/s      0.42 Mbit/s      45.691 ms
     Russia, Moscow (MTS)           0.29 Mbit/s      0.42 Mbit/s      49.215 ms
     Israel, Haifa (013Netvision)   0.44 Mbit/s      0.20 Mbit/s      66.905 ms
     India, New Delhi (Airtel)      0.65 Mbit/s      0.16 Mbit/s     150.603 ms
     Singapore (FirstMedia)         0.65 Mbit/s      0.27 Mbit/s     315.745 ms
     Japan, Tsukuba (SoftEther)     0.87 Mbit/s      0.87 Mbit/s     245.426 ms
     Australia, Sydney (Yes Optus)  0.65 Mbit/s      0.96 Mbit/s     305.003 ms
     Brazil, Sao Paulo (Criare)     0.88 Mbit/s      0.52 Mbit/s     204.744 ms
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
     Finished in : 23 min 9 sec
     Timestamp   : 2019-12-03 11:19:15 GMT
     Saved in    : /root/speedtest.log
    
     Share results:
     - http://www.speedtest.net/result/8818545380.png
     - https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/14993364
     - https://clbin.com/7HrcR
    

    WTF is going on with that network lol, different datacenters apparently, that's a strange one. Let me know how the ticket goes (PM me if you wanna compare notes..)

  • EvolutionHostEvolutionHost Member, Host Rep

    Hey,

    I'll definitely have our tech team check that out.

    To get a true representation of the network speed maybe try downloading a 1GB test file with wget

    Thanked by 2dahartigan alilet
  • Could this be result of getting DDOS? You also provide game server hosting which is a magnet for DDOS.

  • Did 1GB file download test and it was FAST!

    --2019-12-03 03:39:33--  https://speed.hetzner.de/1GB.bin
    Resolving speed.hetzner.de (speed.hetzner.de)... 2a01:4f8:0:59ed::2, 88.198.248.                                                                                        254
    Connecting to speed.hetzner.de (speed.hetzner.de)|2a01:4f8:0:59ed::2|:443... fai                                                                                        led: No route to host.
    Connecting to speed.hetzner.de (speed.hetzner.de)|88.198.248.254|:443... connect                                                                                        ed.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 1048576000 (1000M) [application/octet-stream]
    Saving to: ‘1GB.bin’
    
    1GB.bin                                   100%[=====================================================================================>]   1000M   107MB/s    in 9.2s
    
    2019-12-03 03:39:45 (108 MB/s) - ‘1GB.bin’ saved [1048576000/1048576000]
    
    Thanked by 1uptime
  • It's definitely just an anomaly with the speed test. That's a relief..

  • @dahartigan said:
    It's definitely just an anomaly with the speed test. That's a relief..

    The cores still don't make sense

Sign In or Register to comment.