Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Advertise on LowEndTalk.com

In this Discussion

vserver.site 1 month review
New on LowEndTalk? Please read our 'Community Rules' by clicking on it in the right menu!

vserver.site 1 month review

KVM Ultra - EUR 3,00 . first invoice 20% off (EUR 2,40)

Website shows 20GB HDD, but actual VPS and client page is 50GB.
10TB traffic limit in client panel.

            Pros:
            - Good price for monthly prepaid
            - Good CPU
            - Good network
            - Generous traffic
            - Nice virtualizor panel

            Cons: 
            - very low HDD I/O , not suited for database use
            - For unknown reason cannot upgrade kernel, support does not assist on this



                ----------------------------------------------------------------------
                CPU model            : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           X5650  @ 2.67GHz
                Number of cores      : 2
                CPU frequency        : 2659.986 MHz
                Total size of Disk   : 49.0 GB (6.4 GB Used)
                Total amount of Mem  : 1999 MB (54 MB Used)
                Total amount of Swap : 1022 MB (0 MB Used)
                System uptime        : 13 days, 8 hour 3 min
                Load average         : 0.00, 0.01, 0.05
                OS                   : CentOS 7.6.1810
                Arch                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
                Kernel               : 3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64
                ----------------------------------------------------------------------
                I/O speed(1st run)   : 61.8 MB/s
                I/O speed(2nd run)   : 55.8 MB/s
                I/O speed(3rd run)   : 57.0 MB/s
                Average I/O speed    : 58.2 MB/s
                ----------------------------------------------------------------------
                Node Name                       IPv4 address            Download Speed
                CacheFly                        205.234.175.175         79.4MB/s      
                Linode, Tokyo2, JP              139.162.65.37           3.62MB/s      
                Linode, Singapore, SG           139.162.23.4            7.48MB/s      
                Linode, London, UK              176.58.107.39           52.6MB/s      
                Linode, Frankfurt, DE           139.162.130.8           52.2MB/s      
                Linode, Fremont, CA             50.116.14.9             8.45MB/s      
                Softlayer, Dallas, TX           173.192.68.18           8.91MB/s      
                Softlayer, Seattle, WA          67.228.112.250          8.19MB/s      
                Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE        159.122.69.4            37.3MB/s      
                Softlayer, Singapore, SG        119.81.28.170           7.32MB/s      
                Softlayer, HongKong, CN         119.81.130.170          6.03MB/s      
                ----------------------------------------------------------------------

                CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
                    2.576 seconds
                CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
                    6.905 seconds
                CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
                    1.597 seconds

https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/14310857

Thanked by 2uptime ITLabs

Remember the value of LET is purely based on its traffic.

Comments

  • vserversitevserversite Member, Provider

    Hi,

    thanks for your Feedback. Only when cuetomer tell us this, we can be better.

    Our new Hostnodes get NVMs, so the VMs will be faster.

    I remember with your kernel issue. We dont can Support the VM Operating System, and CentiOS too is not our Favorite Option ;-) feel free to contact us again we will chevk it on a test VM.

    Our Website Storage Options are for New NVM hosts, but actually we deploy on SSD with old sizes. I will give that to our Developers

    Thanked by 2uptime cybertech
Sign In or Register to comment.