More Pale Moon drama. Insists BuyVM being responsible for the breach.
Since last thread was closed down heres continuation:
He even suggests that @Francisco would've used master key to access his machine with that analogy.
Heck, the reason this happened to begin with is not even because we did anything wrong, but because an assumed-safe environment provided by a third party turned out not to be.
I'll draw an analogy for all the people who missed the details of the situation:
Compare it to living in an apartment building. You assume your apartment is safe because the door locks, and you always make sure to lock it and keep the key safely in your pocket. The building has a more secure entrance with a door that can't possibly be breached/picked open.
Now imagine having a break-in from either one of your fellow tenants because the lock on your apartment door is busted or crappy, or the landlord who just lets himself in with the master key. Whose fault would that be? Yours or the landlord's (in both cases)?
To continue the analogy: I've moved out of the building as a result, and will move to a building where I have known and trusted the landlord for many years.
Then he censors all replies that says otherwise.