Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


i-83 Lagging
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

i-83 Lagging

cinwiecinwie Member
edited June 2019 in Providers

hi.

sorry, I'm back again with the topic quadhost or i-83
already from 25/05/2019 (05:46) I open the ticket, but there is no reply at all
my ipv4 is very slow and my ipv6 can't connect, please for @quadhost or @i83 to fix it immediately.

thank you

Comments

  • Pretty sure i83 is a known shit host.

  • MikyMiky Member

    I can confirm everything - on my side of course, pretty bad IPv4, not answering IPv6, and 2 weeks without even acknowledge on multiple tickets.

    No surprise really, but even worse than expected!

  • Seems to be ok on my end:

    64 bytes from 103.216.223.11: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=202 ms

  • @teochristian said:
    Seems to be ok on my end:

    64 bytes from 103.216.223.11: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=202 ms

    That's the ip listed as "mrVM", not the company that's having issues.

  • i83i83 Member
    edited June 2019

    Issue with IPv4 loss and IPv6 connectivity is open with the upstream, awaiting resolution from there side.

    Due to delays in response and resolution from their side we are evaluating moving upstreams as per the service announcement.

    Apologies for any inconvenience caused by the upstream disruption.

  • @teamacc said:

    @teochristian said:
    Seems to be ok on my end:

    64 bytes from 103.216.223.11: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=202 ms

    That's the ip listed as "mrVM", not the company that's having issues.

    You're right, sorry.

    64 bytes from 111.221.44.154: icmp_seq=25 ttl=53 time=1546 ms
    64 bytes from 111.221.44.154: icmp_seq=26 ttl=53 time=1752 ms
    64 bytes from 111.221.44.154: icmp_seq=27 ttl=53 time=1598 ms

  • cinwiecinwie Member

    Thank you @i83 for replying my ticket, after I posted it here.

  • cinwiecinwie Member

    @teochristian said:

    @teamacc said:

    @teochristian said:
    Seems to be ok on my end:

    64 bytes from 103.216.223.11: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=202 ms

    That's the ip listed as "mrVM", not the company that's having issues.

    You're right, sorry.

    64 bytes from 111.221.44.154: icmp_seq=25 ttl=53 time=1546 ms
    64 bytes from 111.221.44.154: icmp_seq=26 ttl=53 time=1752 ms
    64 bytes from 111.221.44.154: icmp_seq=27 ttl=53 time=1598 ms

    i just made a comparison between 2 sgp ip

  • cinwie said: Thank you @i83 for replying my ticket, after I posted it here.

    Since that Service Announcement is from a week and a half ago and directly on point with your issue he likely figured you knew so responding wasn't critical.

  • cinwiecinwie Member

    @skorous said:

    cinwie said: Thank you @i83 for replying my ticket, after I posted it here.

    Since that Service Announcement is from a week and a half ago and directly on point with your issue he likely figured you knew so responding wasn't critical.

    the announcement they just made, I often visited the Network Status but never saw the announcement

  • skorousskorous Member
    edited June 2019

    cinwie said: I often visited the Network Status but never saw the announcement

    Date - 22/05/2019 06:00

    Click the link in i-83's post. Not to be a jerk, just don't like to see a host catch crap unjustifiably.

  • cinwiecinwie Member

    @skorous said:

    cinwie said: I often visited the Network Status but never saw the announcement

    Date - 22/05/2019 06:00

    Click the link in i-83's post. Not to be a jerk, just don't like to see a host catch crap unjustifiably.

    I am lazy to argue with you, only the @i83 and God knows everything. thank you

  • ksfi8ksfi8 Member

    I constantly checked the Network Status page when the problem started and can confirm that the announcement was not made at the timestamp. It was put up just a few days ago.

    Thanked by 1cinwie
  • cinwiecinwie Member

    @ksfi8 said:
    I constantly checked the Network Status page when the problem started and can confirm that the announcement was not made at the timestamp. It was put up just a few days ago.

    @skorous are you reading this?

  • AnthonySmithAnthonySmith Member, Patron Provider

    image

    Thanked by 1uptime
Sign In or Register to comment.