New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Virtualizor for Hosting ?
Hi,
I am planning to get into VPS business.
I am considering Virtualizor with KVM.
Is it good ?
The reason I want to use Virtualizor is because you dont need to setup KVM as a slave server.
It can make the KVM Node the master.
Besides Virtualizor looks much better.
Please let me know of your suggestions.
Comments
do you mean solusvm slave? from what i know u also can install openvz with solusvm master
I hope you're not actually a host because that is the worst out-of-context response I have seen in a while...
oh my a bit sleepy when i write that -_-
i read as virtualization host that time
Now my comment to OP, Virtualizor look promising. it seem more secure, Virtualizor never had such grave bugs.
Virtualizor doesn't have as nice of a user interface but it has similar functionality.
The best think about virtualizor is they has very nice KVM support.
I enjoy virtualizor. It works very well in my eyes. If you want a to see internal parts of it let me know I can show you around it.
I recently started using virtualizor and I personally prefer it to SolusVM.
Thanks I saw their demo first :
http://demo.virtualizor.com
Then I also tried a trial license of Virtualizor.
I went ahead and also tried SolusVM and it was a disaster to setup the master slave thing. Creating a VM is the next biggest thing in SolusVM because you never know if its created or not.
Virtualizor just works and since I dont have to create a master for KVM, I am sticking to it.
Thanks for your inputs and if you have any suggestion for VPS Hosting Startup like myself, please do post.
BTW, is Blesta or WHMCS better with Virtualizor ?
@Damian hasn't been around here in a while, but you may want to see if you can reach out to him on That Other Place; he had some horror stories to tell about Virtualizor in the past.
They may have improved, though.
I've used whmcs with virtualizor never tried blesta with it. The only thing the whmcs module won't do is assign an ipv6 block unless I am doing it wrong. I have to manually assign ipv6 to the vps servers that want it.
It seems alot of people lately are beginning to adopt virtualizor. I may have to throw one up and see how it performs. And if it is a little more security conscious than some of the other popular solutions, that might be the way to go.
We use Virtualizor exclusively. It works great and we've gotten good support from the developers.
Has the error system improved, or is it still limited to "ERROR: There was some error"