Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Do you have a problem with ZxHost? - Page 3
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Do you have a problem with ZxHost?

1356734

Comments

  • @cez said:

    @Falzo said:

    FrankZ said: I was in Germany on 120 GB KVM LET storage special (15.99 pounds a year) for the past year and a half. About a month ago it was migrated to an LXC container in France with double memory.

    okay, thanks a lot for clarifying!

    but afaik the actual problems are about the bigger storage specials (1TB / 2TB) running on ceph and those are still in germany and kvm ;-)
    can't tell if there is anything wrong in france at the moment and if this related to the ceph issues (more or less doubt it though).

    Nope I got the 2TB special, was KVM and Germany. Now LXC and France. Still uses Ceph storage and it's having a hard time atm.

    okay...

  • My three VPS still does not work, and still no answer to my ticket

    I do not have access to the panel, when I click I have this error message:

    HTTP/1.1 595 No route to host

    Thanked by 1dedicados
  • @comeback said:
    My three VPS still does not work, and still no answer to my ticket

    I do not have access to the panel, when I click I have this error message:

    HTTP/1.1 595 No route to host

    same here.

  • same here, i openned a ticket asking if this will be solved today and got no response.

  • sit and wait. it's midnight here, so who knows how long they can keep up with watching the progress or trying to fix things without getting some sleep. that much data will take time to rebuild/transfer/whatever.

    would be very sad if to see this product range getting derranged somehow.

  • Shit happens.

    I have a 1TB box hosted at ZXHost. Fortunately, it only hosts backups and I'm not too concerned apart from the fact I'd have to reupload everything.

    Thanked by 1Falzo
  • Wasn't ZXHost operating with Proxmox? If so, that error could be as simple as Ashley replacing out failing hardware and fucking up the hosts file..

  • Has anyone had an update this morning?

  • I received an email stating that things were being brought back up. I did not have any problems when the issue first started, but now it's down and unable to boot. No biggie though, just a backup to a backupserver.

  • dfroedfroe Member, Host Rep

    @WSS said:
    Wasn't ZXHost operating with Proxmox? If so, that error could be as simple as Ashley replacing out failing hardware and fucking up the hosts file..

    The "old infrastructure" was operated with Virtualizor. I do not know what sorage backend they used, but disk latency has always been very low. It was running amazing, great stuff.

    The "new infrastructure" I was migrated to is Proxmox with Ceph (from what I know). The disk latency there was much worse, about 10-100x slower compared to the old one. And then some days ago the Ceph cluster encountered these problems we are talking about. As they mentioned in their mail they are hitting a bug in Ceph. Unfortunately there are no final fixes regarding this in the bugtracker yet. Might end up a little bit more complicated than just replacing hardware.

    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21142

  • etilicoetilico Member
    edited November 2017

    @michaels said:
    Has anyone had an update this morning?

    Nope :(

  • @michaels said:
    Has anyone had an update this morning?

    Update: "fyi, zxhost.co.uk runs on nginx on fedora"

  • Shot2 said: Update: "fyi, zxhost.co.uk runs on nginx on fedora"

    Wow, it's getting better and better!

  • YmpkerYmpker Member
    edited November 2017

    @deank said:
    Only a noob host would claim 100% SLA.

    Checked
    https://www.clouvider.co.uk ?
    @Clouvider

    They promise 100% uptime. I don't think the "noob host"-tag applies here though. I do not know in how far @Clouvider acctually keeps this promise but 100% SLA sometimes is meant to imply the idea of being eligable for a compensation for any outage of service..not necessarily 100% actual uptime. A positive step of the provider towards your expectations of an excellent service so to speak.

    Thanked by 1Clouvider
  • "Hello,

    We have a work around that is allowing us to bring the OSD's online, we are down to the final OSD's now and expect to be able to start powering on VM's within the next few hours.

    An update will be sent out once VM's start to boot.

    Thanks,
    ZXHost"

    Fingers crossed.

    Thanked by 2michaels etilico
  • why did they switch from 23media to ovh?

  • Luckily I only use this for cold storage but won't be renewing.

  • @Butters said:
    why did they switch from 23media to ovh?

    they didn't, at least not for all services. I have three services which are not from the storage range and not affected by all of this. still going strong in frankfurt/23media. yet the IPs for my storage VMs still route to frankfurt too, though at the moment those VMs of course are down as a result of the ceph disaster.

    I don't see them changing anything right now but can't tell what future plans might look like or not or how they dealt with those migrations that obviously already have taken place before... it also could be a case by case thing, depending on the ressource usage and such? just a wild wild guess.

  • 25 hours...

  • 27 hours

  • they dont answer the tickets.

  • MasonRMasonR Community Contributor

    @emptyPD said:
    25 hours...

    @emptyPD said:
    27 hours

    @emptyPD said:
    they dont answer the tickets.

    The suspense is killing me. Post updates every minute until they are back online please.

    Thanked by 2bugrakoc Amitz
  • @emptyPD said:
    they dont answer the tickets.

    They have sent out status updates and probably have a tonne of tickets asking when it's going to be back online just be patient.

  • @MasonR said:

    @emptyPD said:
    25 hours...

    @emptyPD said:
    27 hours

    @emptyPD said:
    they dont answer the tickets.

    The suspense is killing me. Post updates every minute until they are back online please.

    as your wish.

    27 hours, 10 minutes, 43 seconds.

  • @emptyPD said:
    they dont answer the tickets.

    I totally understand your anger. no one here likes downtimes like this. but think about what you would like more to be done by them. fixing the issues so all can come back online or answering hundreds of tickets. even if you assume it's just a minute per ticket to select, read, put in some premade answers via copy'n'paste - 300 tickets makes it 5 man-hours just to handle that.

    but be optimistic... it's friday evening, weekend ahead. go out and party, I am sure they will continue to fix issues early monday morning :-P

  • Yeah I got the same email update this morning. I'm not worried about the downtime if they're doing disk rebuilds or whatever. Rebuilds are slow and disk intensive and on cheap storage plans I'd frankly prefer having user vm's (including mine) shut down while they are happening, to decrease the likelihood of another crash during restore.

    I notice that the emails have a lot of spelling errors. Does anyone remember if Ash's emails were like that before? I don't, so it makes me wonder if someone other than Ash is writing them.

    I sent ZX an email saying data integrity is more important than uptime and that anyone using these cheap storage plans for critical services is nuts. Mine are cold backups. I do still wonder about the overall state of ZX, given that the 3 year 2TB offer was/is a little bit too attractive (though of course I bought it anyway). But we'll see.

    Thanked by 1Falzo
  • YmpkerYmpker Member
    edited November 2017

    @emptyPD So were you able to upload your clients backups to some temporary solution (like e.g. DO?)? Or did you not have like any offsite backups at all? :/
    Hope it will all work out^^

  • chrispchrisp Member
    edited November 2017

    Falzo said: I totally understand your anger. no one here likes downtimes like this. but think about what you would like more to be done by them. fixing the issues so all can come back online or answering hundreds of tickets. even if you assume it's just a minute per ticket to select, read, put in some premade answers via copy'n'paste - 300 tickets makes it 5 man-hours just to handle that.

    And that's exactly why there is Twitter or their status page. Let's check them:

    and

    Yeah cool, nothing new for more than a day. I also didn't receive any mails. I don't know where you guys got your information from, but they maybe should put it on a public place. In times of such major incidents it is crucial for a good provider to keep posting updates. At least one line every hour does not steal anybodies time fixing the problem. Every hoster has their issues (even Amazon or OVH), the difference is how they handle it.

    @AshleyUk I am disappointed. Not because you didn't answer my tickets for a week and not because the service is still down, but because I don't have any idea what happens and there is no way to find out. By the way, not only storage clients but also regular KVM clients are impacted by the current downtime. I run some productive semi-important shit on there and its always shitty to use slightly older backups, go on with them and merge everything in the end.

    Funny enough I got the invoice email today ;)

  • You expect them to update every hour? So you want, rebuilding, rebuilding, rebuilding, rebuilding.......

  • @chrisp said:

    Yeah cool, nothing new for more than a day. I also didn't receive any mails. I don't know where you guys got your information from, but they maybe should put it on a public place. In times of such major incidents it is crucial for a good provider to keep posting updates. At least one line every hour does not steal anybodies time fixing the problem.

    while I agree that a few more updates would be convenient, what would you expect them to write? "problem didn't change, still working on it" or more like "we're still here, not deadpooled yet"?

    hope you get my point, I don't think updates on ongoing work won't help much if they can't tell how long it may take. other then earning another shitstorm if they can't keep that ETA... the rest is just about customers fear loosing things.

    @AshleyUk I am disappointed.

    he hasn't been logged since Oct 19th...

    By the way, not only storage clients but also regular KVM clients are impacted by the current downtime. I run some productive semi-important shit on there and its always shitty to use slightly older backups, go on with them and merge everything in the end.

    that's odd, but are you sure it's related? my services I have outside the storage offers are working fine without any interruption

    $ uptime
     09:17:15 up 191 days, 14:21,  1 user
Sign In or Register to comment.