Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › looking for kvm vps near toronto
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

looking for kvm vps near toronto

dahoydahoy Member
edited September 2017 in Requests

I'm looking to start up 2-3 small(800-1000 skus total) opencart sites with vestacp & want a vps.
It's been a while so let me know if I need to bump it up to 1.5-2g.


-something close to toronto

-kvm

-1gb

-1cpu

-ssd

-don't need managed monthly right now but wouldn't mind hearing offers with basic/semi/one time fee management.

- can pay yearly

thanks

Comments

  • bersybersy Member

    LunaNode

    Thanked by 1dahoy
  • JoeMeritJoeMerit Veteran

    Get DigitalOcean in Toronto OR get a premium Virmach SSD KVM in Buffalo if the DO is too expensive.

    Thanked by 2bersy dahoy
  • dahoydahoy Member

    picked up a 1gb kvm from virmach to tide me over until BF; $2 monthly with LEB2017G1.

  • abytecuriousabytecurious Member

    Darn.. would have recommended SSDNodes new KVM offering. Their Montreal DC has about 18ms ping from Toronto.

  • JoeMeritJoeMerit Veteran

    CC Buffalo (with Virmach like I recommended) is just a few ms to Toronto on a lot of routes.

  • lihanlinlihanlin Member

    DigitalOcean has node in Toronto

  • dahoydahoy Member

    @JoeMerit said:
    CC Buffalo (with Virmach like I recommended) is just a few ms to Toronto on a lot of routes.

    I ended up choosing CHI(17ms), their NJ/NY to me were 20 & 30. DO & dediserve TOR were ~8ms. MTLs were 30 while Luna's TOR was ~18

    Virmach's pricing was hard to say no to for now especially when BF/CM is around the corner.

  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    @dahoy said:

    @JoeMerit said:
    CC Buffalo (with Virmach like I recommended) is just a few ms to Toronto on a lot of routes.

    I ended up choosing CHI(17ms), their NJ/NY to me were 20 & 30. DO & dediserve TOR were ~8ms. MTLs were 30 while Luna's TOR was ~18

    Virmach's pricing was hard to say no to for now especially when BF/CM is around the corner.

    We peer with most the Canadian isps. Can you send me a tracert to our Buffalo network?

  • doghouchdoghouch Member

    @jbiloh How’s your peering with BACOM/Bell?

  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    We are peered with Bell.

  • PrincessOfCatsPrincessOfCats Member

    @jbiloh said:
    We are peered with Bell.

    Not really.

  • EdmondEdmond Member
    edited October 2017

    @ALinuxNinja said:

    @jbiloh said:
    We are peered with Bell.

    Not really.

    Is it just me or AS36352 doesn't show Bell Canada as one of the peers? Nor does any residential Canadian ISP.

  • RhysRhys Member, Host Rep

    @jbiloh said:
    We are peered with Bell.

    No you're not?

    Thanked by 1Aidan
  • AidanAidan Member

    Perhaps Taco Bell.

    Thanked by 3mikho inthecloudblog IncognitoBurrito
  • FredQcFredQc Member

    @ALinuxNinja said:

    @jbiloh said:
    We are peered with Bell.

    Not really.

    Looking similar with Telus

      1     2 ms     2 ms     1 ms  192.168.50.1
  2    17 ms    17 ms    16 ms  10.135.26.1
  3    40 ms    40 ms    40 ms  75.154.223.209
  4    40 ms    39 ms    39 ms  96.1.252.122
  5    53 ms    67 ms    53 ms  vb2001.rar3.chicago-il.us.xo.net [207.88.13.130]
  6    95 ms    58 ms    53 ms  207.88.12.213.ptr.us.xo.net [207.88.12.213]
  7    53 ms    53 ms    52 ms  216.156.16.249.ptr.us.xo.net [216.156.16.249]
  8    64 ms    64 ms    63 ms  207.86.157.50
  9     *        *        *      
 10     *        *        *      
 11     *        *        *      
 12    59 ms    57 ms    57 ms  192-3-180-103-host.colocrossing.com [192.3.180.103]
 13    59 ms    59 ms    58 ms  192-3-180-103-host.colocrossing.com [192.3.180.103]
  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    Hi guys, please both retest as engineering has made some changes to prefer traffic from Bell and Telus over the routes with TORIX peering.

  • gestiondbigestiondbi Member, Patron Provider

    You told me 2-3 years ago the same thing about peering with canadian ISP.

    On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Jon Biloh <*****@colocrossing.com> wrote:
David,
 
Sorry for missing your earlier email. Regarding Canada one of our carriers just enabled TORIX peering so we’re in the process of connecting to the eye ball networks in Canada. Thus far we have Videotron, Eastlink, Niagara Telecom, OVH and a few others. Rogers and Cogeco are about a month or two away.

    Traffic never goes directly with them but always with a lots of other sub-provider like XO.

    Thanked by 1inthecloudblog
  • WSSWSS Member

    IPv6 IS HARD OK!?!!

    Thanked by 2gestiondbi Rhys
  • PrincessOfCatsPrincessOfCats Member
    edited October 2017

    @jbiloh said:
    Hi guys, please both retest as engineering has made some changes to prefer traffic from Bell and Telus over the routes with TORIX peering.

    Wow.

    No wonder you havent been getting the right routes to Bell for ages. Bell (at least their customer ASN) does not peer with TORIX. You can verify this by checking ASN577 in peeringdb.

  • doghouchdoghouch Member
    edited October 2017

    @ALinuxNinja said:

    @jbiloh said:
    Hi guys, please both retest as engineering has made some changes to prefer traffic from Bell and Telus over the routes with TORIX peering.

    Wow.

    No wonder you havent been getting the right routes to Bell for ages. Bell (at least their customer ASN) does not peer with TORIX. You can verify this by checking ASN577 in peeringdb.

    COUGH.


    I have no idea why I've been coughing so much today.

  • WSSWSS Member

    XO is, well, XO. It's not a member of Torix.

  • EdmondEdmond Member
    edited October 2017

    They just depend on XO to connect their customers... too lazy to peer with Canadian ISPs directly...

    Telus from the west coast:

    Tracing route to lg.buf.colocrossing.com [192.3.180.103]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  ROUTER [192.168.1.1]
  2     *        5 ms    10 ms  10.29.174.1
  3     7 ms     9 ms     8 ms  STTLWAWBCI01.bb.telus.com [75.154.217.106]
  4     8 ms     7 ms     8 ms  206.111.7.33.ptr.us.xo.net [206.111.7.33]
  5    76 ms    76 ms    76 ms  216.156.16.80.ptr.us.xo.net [216.156.16.80]
  6    76 ms    82 ms    76 ms  207.88.12.228.ptr.us.xo.net [207.88.12.228]
  7    76 ms    76 ms    79 ms  207.88.12.144.ptr.us.xo.net [207.88.12.144]
  8    76 ms    76 ms   101 ms  207.88.12.190.ptr.us.xo.net [207.88.12.190]
  9    76 ms    76 ms    78 ms  te0-12-0-0.rar3.sanjose-ca.us.xo.net [207.88.12.189]
 10   100 ms    86 ms    88 ms  207.88.12.164.ptr.us.xo.net [207.88.12.164]
 11    78 ms    87 ms    88 ms  207.88.12.213.ptr.us.xo.net [207.88.12.213]
 12    77 ms    76 ms    76 ms  216.156.16.249.ptr.us.xo.net [216.156.16.249]
 13    81 ms    81 ms    81 ms  207.86.157.54
 14     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 15     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 16     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 17    81 ms    81 ms    81 ms  192-3-180-103-host.colocrossing.com [192.3.180.103]
 18    82 ms    83 ms    88 ms  192-3-180-103-host.colocrossing.com [192.3.180.103]

Trace complete.
  • WSSWSS Member

    [Insert IPvFONLY transit joke here.]

  • leon22lifeleon22life Member
    edited October 2017

    please try xeroxhost provide good VPS, starting $6.5

  • FredQcFredQc Member

    leon22life said: please try xeroxhost provide good VPS, starting $6.5

    And you are? GTFO with your spam shit!

  • WSSWSS Member

    One visit, one comment. Reported.

    Thanked by 1FredQc
Sign In or Register to comment.