Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


firstheberg.com - 9 euro Atom benchmark
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

firstheberg.com - 9 euro Atom benchmark

rdesrdes Member
edited July 2017 in Providers

Hi,
today I've ordered 9,99 euro Atom with SSD from firstheberg.com (thanks to this topic: https://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/110232/huge-list-of-dedicated-server-providers-under-20).

Server was delivered in 30 minutes.

Here's bench.sh if somebody is interested, they seem to have nice connections to the world excluding Fremont, CA ;), but maybe it's problem on Linode side.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU model            : Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU D2500   @ 1.86GHz
Number of cores      : 2
CPU frequency        : 1862.016 MHz
Total size of Disk   : 55.0 GB (1.6 GB Used)
Total amount of Mem  : 3778 MB (41 MB Used)
Total amount of Swap : 0 MB (0 MB Used)
System uptime        : 0 days, 7 hour 52 min
Load average         : 0.00, 0.01, 0.05
OS                   : CentOS 7.3.1611
Arch                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel               : 3.10.0-514.16.1.el7.x86_64
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O speed(1st run)   : 185 MB/s
I/O speed(2nd run)   : 186 MB/s
I/O speed(3rd run)   : 187 MB/s
Average I/O speed    : 186.0 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name                       IPv4 address            Download Speed
CacheFly                        62.210.187.96           12.9MB/s      
Linode, Tokyo, JP               106.187.96.148          7.85MB/s      
Linode, Singapore, SG           139.162.23.4            6.75MB/s      
Linode, London, UK              176.58.107.39           12.7MB/s      
Linode, Frankfurt, DE           139.162.130.8           11.6MB/s      
Linode, Fremont, CA             50.116.14.9             152KB/s       
Softlayer, Dallas, TX           173.192.68.18           9.39MB/s      
Softlayer, Seattle, WA          67.228.112.250          8.95MB/s      
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE        159.122.69.4            12.0MB/s      
Softlayer, Singapore, SG        119.81.28.170           4.79MB/s      
Softlayer, HongKong, CN         119.81.130.170          5.05MB/s      
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Disk is quite old, and 4 GB smaller that they declare in offer

=== START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
Model Family:     SandForce Driven SSDs
Device Model:     OCZ-VERTEX2
Serial Number:    OCZ-S73D3021526Z2FG5
LU WWN Device Id: 5 e83a97 ff82c45d0
Firmware Version: 1.33
User Capacity:    60,022,480,896 bytes [60.0 GB]
Sector Size:      512 bytes logical/physical
Rotation Rate:    Solid State Device
Device is:        In smartctl database [for details use: -P show]
ATA Version is:   ATA8-ACS T13/1699-D revision 6
SATA Version is:  SATA 2.6, 3.0 Gb/s
Local Time is:    Wed Jul 19 20:28:04 2017 UTC
SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
SMART support is: Enabled

=== START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED

[...]

SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 10
Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds:
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME          FLAG     VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE      UPDATED  WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
  1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate     0x000f   119   116   050    Pre-fail  Always       -       0/226446944
  5 Retired_Block_Count     0x0033   100   100   003    Pre-fail  Always       -       0
  9 Power_On_Hours_and_Msec 0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       47304h+33m+13.230s
 12 Power_Cycle_Count       0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       35
171 Program_Fail_Count      0x0032   000   000   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
172 Erase_Fail_Count        0x0032   000   000   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
174 Unexpect_Power_Loss_Ct  0x0030   000   000   000    Old_age   Offline      -       11
177 Wear_Range_Delta        0x0000   000   000   000    Old_age   Offline      -       1
181 Program_Fail_Count      0x0032   000   000   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
182 Erase_Fail_Count        0x0032   000   000   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
187 Reported_Uncorrect      0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
194 Temperature_Celsius     0x0022   030   030   000    Old_age   Always       -       30 (Min/Max 30/30)
195 ECC_Uncorr_Error_Count  0x001c   119   116   000    Old_age   Offline      -       0/226446944
196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0033   100   100   000    Pre-fail  Always       -       0
231 SSD_Life_Left           0x0013   085   085   010    Pre-fail  Always       -       0
233 SandForce_Internal      0x0000   000   000   000    Old_age   Offline      -       72768
234 SandForce_Internal      0x0032   000   000   000    Old_age   Always       -       51968
241 Lifetime_Writes_GiB     0x0032   000   000   000    Old_age   Always       -       51968
242 Lifetime_Reads_GiB      0x0032   000   000   000    Old_age   Always       -       19520

Comments

  • magicvpnmagicvpn Member
    edited July 2017

    My server runs at 100MB/s disks speed (HDD) and my upload speed is ~900mbps

    And the part you said interested they have nice network my answer on that is: yes and no.

    Yes till you recieve one DDoS then you get your burst rate limited and they think you are spoofing. For private and less important things you wan't to host: yes

    For important services, backup storage, ...: No

  • ben47955ben47955 Member
    edited July 2017

    Funny think, I try to order something with my actual account, but that doesn't work for weird reason. Support suggest to create a new account ... I left.

  • @ben47955 said:
    Funny think, I try to order something with my actual account, but that doesn't work for weird reason. Support suggest to create a new account ... I left.

    I got one abuse report onto a shared webserver hosted on one of thier lowest VPS'es (Cry) my account pauzed, Every server shutdowned.

  • AidanAidan Member

    Not going near this host.

    Thanked by 1TarZZ92
  • @Aidan said:
    Not going near this host.

    The URL is firstheberg.com.

    Thanked by 2yomero nulldev
  • ucxoucxo Member

    Could you run nench on that server, please?
    I'm curious about the CPU speed and disk read and seek rates.

  • hzrhzr Member

    rdes said: Disk is quite old, and 4 GB smaller that they declare in offer

    image

  • rdesrdes Member
    edited July 2017

    @ucxo

    Processor:    Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU D2500   @ 1.86GHz
    CPU cores:    2
    Frequency:    1862.016 MHz
    RAM:          3.7G
    Swap:         -
    Kernel:       Linux 3.10.0-514.16.1.el7.x86_64 x86_64
    
    Disks:
    sda   55.9G  SSD
    
    CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
        7.850 seconds
    CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
    23.203 seconds
    CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
    27.198 seconds    
    
    ioping: seek rate
        min/avg/max/mdev = 79.6 us / 198.1 us / 1.95 ms / 17.3 us
    ioping: sequential read speed
        generated 3.38 k requests in 5.00 s, 844.8 MiB, 675 iops, 168.9 MiB/s
    
    dd: sequential write speed
        1st run:    178.34 MiB/s
        2nd run:    178.34 MiB/s
        3rd run:    177.38 MiB/s
        average:    178.02 MiB/s
    
    IPv4 speedtests
        your IPv4:    x
    
        Cachefly CDN:         12.79 MiB/s
        Leaseweb (NL):        11.39 MiB/s
        Softlayer DAL (US):   10.54 MiB/s
        Online.net (FR):      11.41 MiB/s
        OVH BHS (CA):         10.45 MiB/s
    
    No IPv6 connectivity detected
    -------------------------------------------------
    

    @hzr I don't mean available disk space, but disk itself, look at smartctl...

  • magicvpnmagicvpn Member
    edited July 2017

    @ucxo said:
    Could you run nench on that server, please?
    I'm curious about the CPU speed and disk read and seek rates.

    I ran nech.sh on my HDD server at firstheberg: https://pastebin.com/uueyJnd8

    And an iperf test to serverius in the Netherlands:
    [SUM] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.06 GBytes 904 Mbits/sec

Sign In or Register to comment.