Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › Vps/Company offering Best latency between singapore and eu
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Vps/Company offering Best latency between singapore and eu

TomzTomz Member
in General

Hi,

i need Best hosting company that offering low latency between singapore and europe

Vps need to be in Singapore of course

2 GB Ram , 3 TB Bandwidth , 20 GB SSD

Thank you

Comments

  • m3gfm3gf Member

    @dgchost

  • ExpertVMExpertVM Member, Host Rep

    Can provide test IP in EU?

  • ClouviderClouvider Member, Patron Provider

    Where are you based ? We can give you a test IP to test your latency to us if interested.

  • TomzTomz Member

    Hi,

    I need the server to be in Singapore ... but good latency to europe..

    @ExpertVM,
    i made lookglass with your server ping and seem +380ms to Europe

    @Clouvider,
    i tought you offer UK server only ? i cant see singapore option in your website

    Regards

  • sibapersibaper Member
    edited April 2017

    Test using their looking glass/speedtest : VULTR, Linode, oneasiahost.com, Leaseweb, DigitalOcean, dediserve, z.com

    Thanked by 2Tomz dediserve
  • ExpertVMExpertVM Member, Host Rep

    @Tomz please PM me your IP. Thanks!

  • ClouviderClouvider Member, Patron Provider

    Tomz said: @Clouvider, i tought you offer UK server only ? i cant see singapore option in your website

    Assumed you need the other way - server in EU but good latency to Singapore, dunno how I missed it.

  • MridulMridul Member

    DO or Vultr in Singapore ??

  • TomzTomz Member

    ok thank you @all , i picked vultr

  • randvegetarandvegeta Member, Host Rep

    What is 'low latency'?

    I don't have any SG servers but I do have ways of bringing down my latency between HK and Europe from upto 350ms down to 220ms.

    If you consider 220ish to be low, then you need to look for paths through Russia (RETN) or similar. Just not via USA as seems to be the most common.

  • jenkkijenkki Member

    Tomz said: i picked vultr

    Nice find :)

  • rm_rm_ IPv6 Advocate, Veteran

    For me the absolutely lowest is Linode SG with 149ms from Online.net DC3 over HE.net's IPv6 network. But it's much worse on IPv4 with 313ms using Telstra via the US.

    It appears you can get the lowest latency when routed both ways via HE.net's EU<>SG link, and you have more chances to get onto that when using IPv6 not IPv4.

    Thanked by 3Clouvider Makenai vimalware
  • salakissalakis Member
    edited April 2017

    @rm_ said:

    HE.net is indeed pretty good, it all goes through Marseille, so logically Milan and Paris are the best options there. Marseille - Singapore should be as low as 135ms on HE.net or so. However, quite a bit of jitter.

    Thanked by 1darklyght
  • ClouviderClouvider Member, Patron Provider
    edited April 2017

    @rm_ said:
    For me the absolutely lowest is Linode SG with 149ms from Online.net DC3 over HE.net's IPv6 network. But it's much worse on IPv4 with 313ms using Telstra via the US.

    It appears you can get the lowest latency when routed both ways via HE.net's EU<>SG link, and you have more chances to get onto that when using IPv6 not IPv4.

    That's actually pretty decent. Nice find!

    Mind sharing mtr both ways ? Would be interesting to see if this is a Customer direct route or some peering.

  • randvegetarandvegeta Member, Host Rep

    salakis said: Singapore should be as low as 135ms on HE.net

    I've seen that HE.net had a direct connection between EU and SG, and for a time HE.net traffic was actually quite okay to EU (sub 200ms to HK), but I have since stopped seeing this. Now even HE.net routes via USA, at least for me.

  • salakissalakis Member

    @randvegeta said:

    salakis said: Singapore should be as low as 135ms on HE.net

    I've seen that HE.net had a direct connection between EU and SG, and for a time HE.net traffic was actually quite okay to EU (sub 200ms to HK), but I have since stopped seeing this. Now even HE.net routes via USA, at least for me.

    Hmm, I just checked lg.he.net to the EDIS HK looking glass (hk.edis.at).
    195ms from London, 200ms from Frankfurt and 175ms from Marseille. All going via Marseille and Singapore to HKIX.

  • admsamadmsam Member

    You can find those who have GTT, Telia, or duetsche Telekom at singapore. But i am wondering really can get 145ms? as i know point to point from sg to germany already took about 170ms.

  • rm_rm_ IPv6 Advocate, Veteran

    admsam said: But i am wondering really can get 145ms? as i know point to point from sg to germany already took about 170ms.

    149 from Paris:

     Host                                Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
 1. 2001:bc8:2::2:124:1               0.0%    30    0.7   1.6   0.6  10.3   2.2
 2. 2001:bc8:0:1::79                  0.0%    30    0.9   1.1   0.7   2.4   0.4
 3. he.par.franceix.net               0.0%    30    7.4  17.0   0.8  49.9  15.2
 4. 100ge6-1.core2.mrs1.he.net        0.0%    30   10.8  16.2  10.6  29.1   5.0
 5. 100ge10-1.core1.sin1.he.net       0.0%    29  157.1 155.0 148.5 173.4   5.8
 6. 63949.sgw.equinix.com            71.4%    29  151.3 158.3 151.3 163.1   4.4
 7. 2400:8901:1110::2                 0.0%    29  157.1 154.4 149.3 165.4   4.0
 8. speedtest.singapore.linode.com    0.0%    29  149.0 154.2 149.0 165.3   4.3

    But as posted above, it has some variance in latency, i.e. I'm testing just now, and on some tries it's up to 160-170ms.

  • deployvmdeployvm Member, Host Rep
    edited April 2017

    If you look at Khabarovsk (only on certain routes, NTT or PCCW), then you can obtain one of the low latency paths possible to Europe from Asia. With IPv6, not necessarily and mostly via the routes already described above (HE etc).

    So basically the paths go through Russia. There are Khabarovsk <-> Japan/HK paths, and going straight through Northern/Central Europe to the West.

     2. 10.255.10.225                     0.0%    74    0.5   5.9   0.4  69.6  15.4
 3. xxxxx   0.0%    74    0.8   0.8   0.6   2.8   0.2
 4. 188.254.90.xx                    0.0%    74    0.3   0.3   0.3   1.5   0.1
 5. 95.167.37.212                     0.0%    73    1.0   1.0   1.0   2.2   0.1
 6. 61.213.146.253                    0.0%    73   52.9  52.5  46.6  57.1   2.8
 7. ae-14.r31.tokyjp05.jp.bb.gin.ntt 15.1%    73   53.5  53.2  47.1  57.8   2.4
 8. ???
 9. ae-13.r00.sngpsi02.sg.bb.gin.ntt  0.0%    73  104.5 104.8 104.3 106.9   0.4
10. xe-0-5-0-25.r00.sngpsi02.sg.ce.g  0.0%    73  103.9 104.1 103.5 125.0   2.4
11. xe-1-2-0.cr01.sin-11.sg.leaseweb  0.0%    73  104.0 106.5 104.0 151.2   9.0
12. et-49.ce01.sin-11.sg.leaseweb.ne  0.0%    73  103.9 104.0 103.9 104.3   0.0
13. 209.58.176.65                     0.0%    73  103.8 103.8 103.7 104.4   0.0
14. ipip.net-80host.com-1Gbps.leasew  0.0%    73  103.7 103.8 103.7 104.3   0.0

    From Japan KDDI, it is 25ms as the lowest.

      2.|-- 10.255.10.225              0.0%    10    0.5   0.7   0.5   1.4   0.0
  3.|-- xxx 0.0%    10    0.7   0.8   0.6   1.4   0.0
  4.|-- 188.254.90.xxx             0.0%    10    0.3   0.3   0.3   0.3   0.0
  5.|-- 95.167.94.212              0.0%    10    1.0   1.2   1.0   2.3   0.3
  6.|-- 188.254.55.226             0.0%    10   23.7  27.5  23.7  35.3   4.3
  7.|-- otejbb205.int-gw.kddi.ne.  0.0%    10   23.8  24.9  23.7  27.9   1.4
  8.|-- cm-fcu204.kddnet.ad.jp     0.0%    10   30.4  30.1  24.6  37.0   4.3
  9.|-- 124.215.199.170            0.0%    10   25.2  24.8  24.7  25.2   0.0
 10.|-- speedtest.tokyo.linode.co  0.0%    10   24.5  24.6  24.5  24.9   0.0

    To Stockholm:

    Host                                Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
 1. ???
 2. 10.255.10.225                     0.0%    10    0.5   0.5   0.4   0.9   0.0
 3. xxxx  0.0%    10    0.7   1.2   0.7   2.8   0.7
 4. 188.254.90.xxx                    0.0%    10    0.3   0.4   0.3   1.3   0.0
 5. ae40.stkm-cr4.intl.ip.rostelecom  0.0%    10  122.3 122.6 122.2 125.5   1.0
 6. netnod-ix-ge-b-sth-1500-2.bredba  0.0%    10  121.3 121.7 121.0 127.4   1.9
 7. ti3163c360-ae6-0.ti.telenor.net   0.0%    10  118.9 119.7 118.9 122.9   1.3
 8. ti3097d400-ae1-0.ti.telenor.net   0.0%    10  123.1 126.3 123.0 152.2   9.1
 9. ti3001a900-xe2-13-1.ti.telenor.n  0.0%    10  125.8 125.8 125.5 126.7   0.0
10. telenor.se                        0.0%    10  123.7 128.2 123.7 165.8  13.2
  • rm_rm_ IPv6 Advocate, Veteran
    edited April 2017

    For SG going via Russia will not be a win, as the Middle-East route to Europe is shorter. For Hong Kong and Japan it might, but the OP asks for Singapore.

    Thanked by 1deployvm
  • deployvmdeployvm Member, Host Rep

    rm_ said: For SG going via Russia will not be a win, as the Middle-East route to Europe is shorter.

    You're right with cable systems such as SEA-ME-WE 3 or 4.

  • NubSmooNubSmoo Member

    I'm from Australia, would routing to eu server be similar? would like a eu server where i get lower ping atm my UK one i get 330-350 lmao

  • rm_rm_ IPv6 Advocate, Veteran

    NubSmoo said: I'm from Australia, would routing to eu server be similar? would like a eu server where i get lower ping atm my UK one i get 330-350 lmao

    What's your ping to Singapore? Add 150ms (best case) to that. But I'm afraid you won't get any route from Australia towards EU without getting a jump box in Singapore yourself first (that you would have a direct route to).

  • teamaccteamacc Member

    @NubSmoo said:
    I'm from Australia, would routing to eu server be similar? would like a eu server where i get lower ping atm my UK one i get 330-350 lmao

    300ms from vultr australia to hetzner/ovh/online.net (+-5ms). Not much to gain using the "most popular" routes.

  • deployvmdeployvm Member, Host Rep
    edited April 2017

    NubSmoo said: I'm from Australia, would routing to eu server be similar?

    The best case to Singapore from Australia (WA) is about 55-60ms. Via SMW3 to London, it is possible for the total latency to be around 290ms. A year ago, such routes existed with major ISPs... You probably won't find a PER-SG-LON (LINX or AMS-IX) route now.

Sign In or Register to comment.