Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Lunanode benchmark
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

Lunanode benchmark

Recently I started working towards consolidating all my servers into cloud servers. One of the vendors I am impressed so far is lunanode. Thought I ll share bench marks for a smaller 1 GB SSD node for people who may be interested in. interpretations are upto the reader.

Benchmark Run: Fri Jan 06 2017 23:02:45 - 23:30:47
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       37486483.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     4456.0 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               4382.4 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       1035966.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          283271.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       2196562.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             2188034.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 368351.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              10776.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   9383.5 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1898.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        4468507.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   37486483.1   3212.2
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       4456.0    810.2
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       4382.4   1019.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0    1035966.5   2616.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     283271.4   1711.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    2196562.0   3787.2
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    2188034.8   1758.9
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     368351.1    920.9
Process Creation                                126.0      10776.5    855.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       9383.5   2213.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1898.6   3164.3
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    4468507.7   2979.0
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1817.6

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Jan 06 2017 23:30:47 - 23:58:50
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       74735391.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     8895.7 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               9460.2 lps   (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       1176185.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          321664.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       2957554.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             4346548.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 727311.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              22017.9 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  14168.9 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1967.3 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        6166012.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   74735391.9   6404.1
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       8895.7   1617.4
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       9460.2   2200.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0    1176185.3   2970.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     321664.0   1943.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    2957554.5   5099.2
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    4346548.1   3494.0
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     727311.8   1818.3
Process Creation                                126.0      22017.9   1747.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      14168.9   3341.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1967.3   3278.9
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    6166012.4   4110.7
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        2887.1

Limited number of locations is definitely a negative for them. snappy control panel is the positive. Nodes seems to be pretty good, while documentation is not the best out there. Cost is plus, while it may also turn negative for some. OVH networks has mixed reviews so does cogent. That might be a slight negative for some.

Thanked by 1yomero

tutorials & rumblings on technology trends - nimidam.com

Comments

  • sinsin Member

    I love Lunanode, just wish they had IPv6 available in their other locations instead of just Toronto.

    Thanked by 2vimalware GCat
  • @sin said:
    I love Lunanode, just wish they had IPv6 available in their other locations instead of just Toronto.

    Well, the best locations come first.... @doghouch

    Thanked by 2doghouch Jonchun

    My comments are mine and mine alone, and do not reflect the opinion of my business

  • so how does this compare to DO or times4vps ?

  • tmwctmwc Member

    @a7medo778 said:
    so how does this compare to DO or times4vps ?

    Just going to say that you're necroposting

    Aside from that, you should probably just roll the dice and spin up a instance on those providers and see how far you get compared to these results.

    [~] - my website
    discord - tilda#9999

Sign In or Register to comment.