Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › European-based free non-logging public DNS provider
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

European-based free non-logging public DNS provider

hanidoyahanidoya Member
in Requests

I use Google DNS, but I do not trust Google DNS.Would you recommend a non-logging free public DNS provider whose headquarters and servers are in Europe?I thank everyone.

«1

Comments

  • nagugnagug Member

    https://greycoder.com/list-uncensored-dns-providers/

    I like the Danish one. Atleast fast from UK. Not a fan of other two.

    Thanked by 1deadbeef
  • deadbeefdeadbeef Member

    @nagug said:
    https://greycoder.com/list-uncensored-dns-providers/

    I like the Danish one. Atleast fast from UK. Not a fan of other two.

    I use dns.watch - no issues.

  • BlazeMuisBlazeMuis Member

    Using DNS.watch and my own ad blocking DNS, no problems at all.

    Thanked by 2karjaj Ympker
  • HackedServerHackedServer Member

    Never used it myself but I believe its ran by @fusl http://dnsrec.meo.ws/

  • ClouviderClouvider Member, Patron Provider

    own resolver perhaps. Even if someone claims they don't log, they as well might.

  • Falco33Falco33 Member

    http://servers.opennicproject.org

  • jenkkijenkki Member

    VeriSign DNS told about respect privacy and not log users, but nobody knows.. ;)

  • hanidoyahanidoya Member

    @jenkki said:
    VeriSign DNS told about respect privacy and not log users, but nobody knows.. ;)

    I do not want my information to be sent to the NSA. :D There is no trust in any US based company.

    @HackedServer said:
    Never used it myself but I believe its ran by @fusl http://dnsrec.meo.ws/

    Are they normal DNS servers or DNSCrypt servers?

    @Falco33 said:
    http://servers.opennicproject.org

    OpenNIC broke its stability over the last few months.

    @nagug said:
    https://greycoder.com/list-uncensored-dns-providers/

    I like the Danish one. Atleast fast from UK. Not a fan of other two.

    Thank you.

    I am looking for different alternatives.

  • dedicadosdedicados Member

    https://www.cesidianroot.eu

  • jenkkijenkki Member
    edited January 2017

    hanidoya said: hanidoya

    Try Yandex DNS Based in Russia

    https://dns.yandex.com/

  • MinimalistMinimalist Member

    https://dnscrypt.is/

  • jenkkijenkki Member

    Minimalist said: https://dnscrypt.is/

    Better to have at least two DNS IP

  • YmpkerYmpker Member
    edited January 2017

    @joodle said:
    Using DNS.watch and my own ad blocking DNS, no problems at all.

    This guys DNS is awesome :P Used it the other day^^
    Can you acctually explain to me how blocking ads via a dns works? Im a total nub and I thought DNS was just for resolving Hostnames etc. So Im assuming you can somehow block certain Extensions/automatic triggering of js and the like?

  • MagicalTrainMagicalTrain Member

    @Ympker said:

    @joodle said:
    Using DNS.watch and my own ad blocking DNS, no problems at all.

    This guys DNS is awesome :P Used it the other day^^
    Can you acctually explain to me how blocking ads via a dns works? Im a total nub and I thought DNS was just for resolving Hostnames etc. So Im assuming you can somehow block certain Extensions/automatic triggering of js and the like?

    DNS based adblock simply routes all known advertising domains to 127.0.0.1 or the like.

    Thanked by 1Ympker
  • datanoisedatanoise Member

    If you want to be sure no logging is involved you'd probably have to run your own DNS resolver as anybody can claim they don't log while they do. Install unbound or pdnsd for example. It won't be as fast though.

  • hanidoyahanidoya Member

    @Minimalist said:
    https://dnscrypt.is/

    I use Ubuntu. I set it in the resolv.conf file. (nameserver 93.95.228.87) But when I want to surf with the browser, it gives me an error. Is this a normal DNS server or just a DNSCrypt server?

    @jenkki said:

    Minimalist said: https://dnscrypt.is/

    Better to have at least two DNS IP

    I use Ubuntu. I set it in the resolv.conf file. (nameserver 93.95.228.87) But when I want to surf with the browser, it gives me an error. Is this a normal DNS server or just a DNSCrypt server?

  • chrispchrisp Member

    https://github.com/jedisct1/dnscrypt-proxy/blob/master/dnscrypt-resolvers.csv

    Mostly for inspiration

  • datanoisedatanoise Member

    hanidoya said: Is this a normal DNS server or just a DNSCrypt server?

    DNSCrypt. You'll have to install dnscrypt-proxy.

  • YmpkerYmpker Member
    edited January 2017

    @MagicalTrain said:

    @Ympker said:

    @joodle said:
    Using DNS.watch and my own ad blocking DNS, no problems at all.

    This guys DNS is awesome :P Used it the other day^^
    Can you acctually explain to me how blocking ads via a dns works? Im a total nub and I thought DNS was just for resolving Hostnames etc. So Im assuming you can somehow block certain Extensions/automatic triggering of js and the like?

    DNS based adblock simply routes all known advertising domains to 127.0.0.1 or the like.

    Aha so it sorta goes to /dev/null just that in this case thats localhost/127.0.0.1 ?

  • pbgbenpbgben Member, Host Rep

    @Ympker said:

    @MagicalTrain said:

    @Ympker said:

    @joodle said:
    Using DNS.watch and my own ad blocking DNS, no problems at all.

    This guys DNS is awesome :P Used it the other day^^
    Can you acctually explain to me how blocking ads via a dns works? Im a total nub and I thought DNS was just for resolving Hostnames etc. So Im assuming you can somehow block certain Extensions/automatic triggering of js and the like?

    DNS based adblock simply routes all known advertising domains to 127.0.0.1 or the like.

    Aha so it sorta goes to /dev/null just that in this case thats localhost/127.0.0.1 ?

    Thanked by 1vimalware
  • YmpkerYmpker Member

    @pbgben said:

    @Ympker said:

    @MagicalTrain said:

    @Ympker said:

    @joodle said:
    Using DNS.watch and my own ad blocking DNS, no problems at all.

    This guys DNS is awesome :P Used it the other day^^
    Can you acctually explain to me how blocking ads via a dns works? Im a total nub and I thought DNS was just for resolving Hostnames etc. So Im assuming you can somehow block certain Extensions/automatic triggering of js and the like?

    DNS based adblock simply routes all known advertising domains to 127.0.0.1 or the like.

    Aha so it sorta goes to /dev/null just that in this case thats localhost/127.0.0.1 ?

    Damn Id love to know that reference now :P Unfortunately I dont seem to know the dude on the gif :/

  • pbgbenpbgben Member, Host Rep

    @Ympker said:

    @pbgben said:

    @Ympker said:

    @MagicalTrain said:

    @Ympker said:

    @joodle said:
    Using DNS.watch and my own ad blocking DNS, no problems at all.

    This guys DNS is awesome :P Used it the other day^^
    Can you acctually explain to me how blocking ads via a dns works? Im a total nub and I thought DNS was just for resolving Hostnames etc. So Im assuming you can somehow block certain Extensions/automatic triggering of js and the like?

    DNS based adblock simply routes all known advertising domains to 127.0.0.1 or the like.

    Aha so it sorta goes to /dev/null just that in this case thats localhost/127.0.0.1 ?

    Damn Id love to know that reference now :P Unfortunately I dont seem to know the dude on the gif :/

    He is saying yarp

    Thanked by 1Ympker
  • iKeyZiKeyZ Veteran

    From the movie Hot Fuzz :-)

  • noamannoaman Member

    @datanoise said:
    If you want to be sure no logging is involved you'd probably have to run your own DNS resolver as anybody can claim they don't log while they do. Install unbound or pdnsd for example. It won't be as fast though.

    Cant this be used for dns amplification attacks?

  • Shot2Shot2 Member

    @noaman said:

    Cant this be used for dns amplification attacks?

    It won't, unless you -deliberately or inadvertently- make it an open resolver.

  • teamaccteamacc Member

    Not sure, but I think @william @joeri or @joepie91 ran a dns server, tagging for confirmation

    Thanked by 1joeri
  • WilliamWilliam Member
    edited January 2017

    iKeyZ said: From the movie Hot Fuzz :-)

    Good movie. The others in the cornetto trilogy are cool also.

    teamacc said: Not sure, but I think @william @joeri or @joepie91 ran a dns server, tagging for confirmation

    I run many things, but no resolving DNS...

  • HackedServerHackedServer Member
    edited January 2017

    Nvm..

  • joerijoeri Member, Host Rep, LIR

    @teamacc said:
    Not sure, but I think @william @joeri or @joepie91 ran a dns server, tagging for confirmation

    We have now only DNS hosting (dnsmanager.io) but we working on a public DNS services

  • raindog308raindog308 Administrator, Veteran

    @joodle said:
    Using DNS.watch and my own ad blocking DNS, no problems at all.

    What is your own ad blocking dns? Rules you created or...?

Sign In or Register to comment.