Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


SwitchVM - Benchmarks? - Page 2
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

SwitchVM - Benchmarks?

24567

Comments

  • PacketVMPacketVM Member, Host Rep

    @SimpleNode said: @dominicl How much RAM? Also, please get RAID10 on Both nodes :)

    Well, everyone loves RAID10..or so it seems. Get on Skype ;) The first node has 8GB, upgradable to 16GB. Second node will probably start at 16GB.

  • @jcaleb said: care to share?

    Last time i used vpsfx promo vps, got nice latency but not as good as from LA though. For now budgetvm LA vps give me lowest and stable latency from my location here (Malaysia).

    Thanked by 1jcaleb
  • PacketVMPacketVM Member, Host Rep

    @budingyun said: Last time i used vpsfx promo vps, got nice latency but not as good as from LA though. For now budgetvm LA vps give me lowest and stable latency from my location here (Malaysia).

    Glad to hear it ;) You'll be surprised by the LET offer coming up. It's well within the LET price point, don't worry.

  • @dominicl your company is vpsfx? or is that dc?

  • PacketVMPacketVM Member, Host Rep

    @jcaleb said: @dominicl your company is vpsfx? or is that dc?

    No, I don't have a clue who VPSFX is. I think he was stating that he used them and had good connections to where he lives. The DC I'm using is PhoenixNAP

    Thanked by 1jcaleb
  • JacobJacob Member
    edited August 2012

    PhoenixNAP Providers will drain your pennies, I used infinitie.net and I regret leaving them on a blackfriday sale I picked up 100TB Bandwidth for $50 on a Gbit port pooled between 2 or 3 servers(cannot remember).

    The invoices add up, and Jeesh you don't realise how much you have spent untill it is gone.

  • PacketVMPacketVM Member, Host Rep

    @Jacob said: PhoenixNAP will drain your pennies, I used infinitie.net and I regret leaving them on a blackfriday sale I picked up 100TB Bandwidth for $50 on a Gbit port pooled between 2 or 3 servers(cannot remember)

    I've seen so many bad reviews on Infinitie..I can't remember a good one. One quite recently too

  • @dominicl said: Glad to hear it ;) You'll be surprised by the LET offer coming up. It's well within the LET price point, don't worry.

    Any test ip?

    @jcaleb said: your company is vpsfx? or is that dc?

    Vpsfx also located in PhoenixNAP. :D

    Thanked by 1jcaleb
  • PacketVMPacketVM Member, Host Rep

    @budingyun said: Any test ip?

    Sure, 198.15.92.82

    @budingyun said: Vpsfx also located in PhoenixNAP. :D

    Nice to hear that!

  • 250ms from Manila

  • PacketVMPacketVM Member, Host Rep

    @jcaleb said: 250ms from Manila

    Wow - yeah. There are other providers that use PhoenixNAP on here I believe. NodeDeploy and another one

  • budingyunbudingyun Member
    edited August 2012

    Same +-250ms from Malaysia.

    More 10ms from my connection to LA.

    ps: I'm using HSPA+ network, that's why the value a bit high.

  • PacketVMPacketVM Member, Host Rep

    Ah right, OK. From here, I get 160-170ms.

  • SimpleNodeSimpleNode Member
    edited August 2012

    Wellington, New Zealand compared to our servers in Dallas.

    app_85@android:/ # ping 198.15.92.82

    PING 198.15.92.82 (198.15.92.82) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 198.15.92.82: icmp_seq=1 ttl=47 time=307 ms
    64 bytes from 198.15.92.82: icmp_seq=2 ttl=47 time=226 ms
    64 bytes from 198.15.92.82: icmp_seq=3 ttl=47 time=356 ms
    64 bytes from 198.15.92.82: icmp_seq=4 ttl=47 time=275 ms
    64 bytes from 198.15.92.82: icmp_seq=5 ttl=47 time=294 ms
    64 bytes from 198.15.92.82: icmp_seq=6 ttl=47 time=423 ms
    ^C
    --- 198.15.92.82 ping statistics ---
    7 packets transmitted, 6 received, 14% packet loss, time 6009ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 226.196/313.766/423.493/62.461 ms
    app_85@android:/ # ping argon.node.simpleno.de
    PING argon.node.simpleno.de (23.29.124.226) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from argon.node.simpleno.de (23.29.124.226): icmp_seq=1 ttl=4
    64 bytes from argon.node.simpleno.de (23.29.124.226): icmp_seq=2 ttl=4
    64 bytes from argon.node.simpleno.de (23.29.124.226): icmp_seq=3 ttl=4
    64 bytes from argon.node.simpleno.de (23.29.124.226): icmp_seq=4 ttl=4
    64 bytes from argon.node.simpleno.de (23.29.124.226): icmp_seq=5 ttl=4
    ^C
    app_85@android:/ #
    6 packets transmitted, 5 received, 16% packet loss, time 5129ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 243.042/308.178/373.810/42.076 ms

  • PacketVMPacketVM Member, Host Rep

    Here's mine:

    ping 198.15.92.82
    
    Pinging 198.15.92.82 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 198.15.92.82: bytes=32 time=172ms TTL=44
    Reply from 198.15.92.82: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=44
    Reply from 198.15.92.82: bytes=32 time=172ms TTL=44
    Reply from 198.15.92.82: bytes=32 time=172ms TTL=44
    
    Ping statistics for 198.15.92.82:
        Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
        Minimum = 171ms, Maximum = 172ms, Average = 171ms
  • Time for me to rant about NZ's crap internet. 1 sec.

  • Mine:

    C:\Users\budingyun>ping 198.15.92.82
    
    Pinging 198.15.92.82 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 198.15.92.82: bytes=32 time=245ms TTL=44
    Reply from 198.15.92.82: bytes=32 time=253ms TTL=44
    Reply from 198.15.92.82: bytes=32 time=251ms TTL=44
    Reply from 198.15.92.82: bytes=32 time=249ms TTL=44
    
    Ping statistics for 198.15.92.82:
        Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
        Minimum = 245ms, Maximum = 253ms, Average = 249ms
    
  • PacketVMPacketVM Member, Host Rep

    Yeah, if you're in the UK/US it's obviously going to be better than if you're not.

  • traceroute to 198.15.92.82 (198.15.92.82), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
     1  192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1)  11.230 ms  3.448 ms  1.953 ms
     2  192.168.1.254 (192.168.1.254)  79.590 ms  15.045 ms  190.338 ms
     3  122-62-128-4.jetstream.xtra.co.nz (122.62.128.4)  42.420 ms  41.168 ms  40.314 ms
     4  122-62-128-1.jetstream.xtra.co.nz (122.62.128.1)  47.729 ms  90.911 ms  39.490 ms
     5  *  mdr-fid-int.akbr5.global-gateway.net.nz (202.37.244.222)  61.340 ms  53.955 ms
     6  ae4-10.akbr5.global-gateway.net.nz (202.37.244.221)  53.010 ms  59.143 ms  50.812 ms
     7  xe3-1-0.tkbr9.global-gateway.net.nz (202.50.232.74)  51.606 ms  54.016 ms  51.239 ms
     8  ae2-3.labr5.global-gateway.net.nz (203.96.120.142)  308.746 ms  193.726 ms  so6-1-3.labr5.global-gateway.net.nz (202.5
     9  ae0-3.lebr6.global-gateway.net.nz (203.96.120.86)  206.817 ms  302.033 ms  406.219 ms
    10  2-2.r1.la.hwng.net (206.223.123.75)  306.702 ms  304.962 ms  ae0-3.lebr6.global-gateway.net.nz (203.96.120.86)  307.95
    11  2-2.r1.la.hwng.net (206.223.123.75)  181.641 ms  202.118 ms  307.648 ms
    12  unknown.hwng.net (209.197.5.154)  514.283 ms  206.543 ms  403.748 ms
    13  108.170.0.37 (108.170.0.37)  208.130 ms  unknown.hwng.net (209.197.5.154)  207.733 ms  299.500 ms
    14  108.170.0.17 (108.170.0.17)  306.762 ms  108.170.0.37 (108.170.0.37)  306.000 ms  *
    15  198.15.92.82 (198.15.92.82)  304.504 ms  *  217.682 ms
    

    What is this? 15 hops?
    Last time I checked it was 22 hops to PhoenixNAP. New Zealand internet got better somehow o.o

  • PacketVMPacketVM Member, Host Rep

    Apparantely it did :P

  • So when is SwitchVM launching?

  • PacketVMPacketVM Member, Host Rep

    @SimpleNode said: So when is SwitchVM launching?

    When I've got everything finished up. Quite a few more things to do, but maybe end of this week - early next week.

  • SimpleNodeSimpleNode Member
    edited August 2012

    @dominicl Astounding! -.-

    Well, back to MCForums where people think FTP means Full server management (how does that work?)

    Thanked by 1Ash_Hawkridge
  • PacketVMPacketVM Member, Host Rep

    @SimpleNode said: Well, back to MCForums where people think FTP means Full server management (how does that work?)

    Well before buying a server, they need to figure out what one is, generally..

  • SimpleNodeSimpleNode Member
    edited August 2012

    I'm pretty sure 90% of the summer hosts there are more clueless about Minecraft Hosting (and servers in general) than their customers.

  • PacketVMPacketVM Member, Host Rep

    @SimpleNode said: I'm pretty sure 90% of the summer hosts there are more clueless about Minecraft Hosting than their customers.

    I wouldn't be surprised. They just think - "Yeah I'll buy a Kimsufi server, and get a bit of extra money". They buy a KS server, haven't a clue how to use it. They buy a Multicraft license, haven't a clue how to install it. Server goes down, haven't a clue how to get it back up. DDoS attack, doesn't know what one is. Abuse report, doesn't know how to deal with it. Server, doesn't know what it is.

  • JacobJacob Member
    edited August 2012

    I had like 185ms from virginmedia, suckish bandwidth it seems.

    Edit: 160ms now.

  • PacketVMPacketVM Member, Host Rep

    @Jacob said: I had like 185ms from virginmedia, suckish bandwidth it seems.

    That's not amazing, but not awful. They're at the far end of the US compared to the UK, literally the furthest. Well, you won't resist when you see some of the LET deals.

  • SimpleNodeSimpleNode Member
    edited August 2012

    It's pretty bad.

    I can get better ping than that from New Zealand (at 2AM :P)

  • PacketVMPacketVM Member, Host Rep

    @SimpleNode said: I can get better ping than that from New Zealand (at 2AM :P)

    :P lol

This discussion has been closed.