Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Tweaking SpamAssassin
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Tweaking SpamAssassin

jhjh Member

Hi all,

I'm getting a lot of very obvious spam (viagra etc). SpamAssassin picks out about 80% but I'm wondering if anyone can suggest a way of picking up the other 20%. I've started looking up the IPs on www.dnsbl.info and none of them are blacklisted on any lists. One example is 95.154.246.239. They all show as spam score 8 - my current threshold is the default, 5. I want to avoid just increasing that number because email lost could be new business.

Ideas?

Thanked by 14n0nx

Comments

  • BruceBruce Member

    I gave up years ago, and just let Gmail do the work. lazy I know :)

  • jhjh Member

    Bruce said: I gave up years ago, and just let Gmail do the work. lazy I know :)

    I don't use Google, Dropbox, Facebook etc.

    Thanked by 24n0nx Amitz
  • BruceBruce Member

    any specific reason to avoid gmail? if you don't mind the potential/real privacy intrusion, you can just use them as a relay - imap/pop3 to your own server

    I'm OK with NSA scanning my emails :) perhaps foolish, but I've nothing to hide. not yet anyway

    Thanked by 1MikePT
  • I have good luck with postgrey and postscreen in addition to SpamAssassin.

    But then postscreen would be useless if they don't show up on blacklist.

  • jhjh Member

    I hate ads. I hate targeted ads even more. I like to be in control of my data and my business, and make my own backups. I don't want to pay Google.

    Some of my customers are security-conscious just as I am and some time ago, one, who was a researcher at a major infosec centre, commented on my MX records :)

    It's just nice to be in control and avoid all of that.

    Thanked by 34n0nx NeoXiD Amitz
  • tehdantehdan Member

    Are you using razor/pyzor/dcc checks?

    Thanked by 1jar
  • wychwych Member

    @Jar might have some pearls of wisdom for you ;)

    Thanked by 1jar
  • 4n0nx4n0nx Member

    lurking

  • jarjar Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran

    @wych said:
    Jar might have some pearls of wisdom for you ;)

    Yes. SpamAssassin is frequently stated as ineffective, and this is simply false. Spammers change more rapidly than SpamAssassin is updated, that is all. However, you can find the tests that are being set off by incoming spam and you can change the values that are added to the score for each test in the configuration.

    Will post my current configuration in a bit :)

  • jarjar Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran

    Here we go. This is what's in my local.cf right now: http://pastebin.com/qRJ5y4Cj

  • jhjh Member

    Really helpful, thanks @Jar

  • ClouviderClouvider Member, Patron Provider
    edited May 2015

    @jhadley we could offer you Spam Experts incoming protection in front of your mail servers, but that's hosted on-site with us. I promise though, we have no affiliation with the NSA, nor do we use any of your data to target any ads.

    It would involve changing MX to our white labeled Spam Experts relay, I don't know if that's still acceptable for you though.

    If you are interested just drop me a PM and we can work something out.

  • @Jar

    I have implemented your SpamAssassin config - thanks for sharing :)

    I wonder if you have made any updates to it since posting?

    Thanked by 1jar
  • jarjar Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran

    @adamluk said:
    Jar

    I have implemented your SpamAssassin config - thanks for sharing :)

    I wonder if you have made any updates to it since posting?

    Still the same, interestingly enough. It's been working really well! For extreme cases, I've been setting up sa-learn crons for clients to train account specific filters, which has cut down on my tweaking of these rules just a bit.

    Thanked by 1adamluk
Sign In or Register to comment.