Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Which one you would pick from this VPS list?.
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Which one you would pick from this VPS list?.

goodonegoodone Member
edited April 2015 in General

Hi, I need opinions from people who has used services from this providers. Like kind of services they provide, chat response time.. do they make scheduled backup?. Are they trustworthy in the market?. how much uptime or any DDoS protection? and if any of them are best for setting up a control panel with apache, mailserver, fail2ban, clamv, spamassassins, innodb, wordpress etc.

Just for clarifying, I am not related with any kind of marketing for below vps brand.... I am a guy who is looking for a vps with above requirements. Budget less then 40$ per year. Not sure which is better so I posted both SSD caching, SSD, HDD.

Crissic - OVZ2048 :-

2048MB RAM
2048MB vSwap
4 vCPU cores
200GB HDD space
4TB transfer
1x IPv4
/64 IPv6
OpenVZ/SolusVM

OpenVirtuals - Professional-CACHED :-

1024MB RAM
2048MB vSwap
4 CPU Cores
210GB Disk space
SSD-cached
3000GB Bandwidth
1x IPv4 address
OpenVZ/SolusVM

Ftpit - Buffalo 2GB SSD :-

2GB RAM
2 CPU cores
25GB SSD space
1TB transfer
1Gbps uplink
1x IPv4
OpenVZ/SolusVM

VMBox.co :-

2GB RAM
50GB SSD-cached disk space
4 CPU cores
2TB transfer
1Gbps uplink
1x IPv4 (Amsterdam and Phoenix)
2x IPv4 (Los Angeles)
5x IPv6 (Los Angeles)
OpenVZ/SolusVM

HudsonValleyHost - OpenVZ VPS :-

3GB RAM
75GB HDD space
3TB Bandwidth
100Mbps uplink
2x IPv4
OpenVZ/SolusVM

BoltVM - Thunder 2048 :-

2GB RAM
2GB vSwap
2 CPU cores
200GB HDD space
SSD-cached
2TB transfer
1Gbps uplink
1x IPv4
OpenVZ/SolusVM
Help me to decide which to go for by your voting if you like :)
  1. Help me to decide which to go for by your voting if you like :)75 votes
    1. BoltVM
      29.33%
    2. HudsonValleyHost
        6.67%
    3. VMBox.co
        6.67%
    4. Ftpit
        1.33%
    5. OpenVirtuals
        1.33%
    6. Crissic
      54.67%
«1

Comments

  • I would go with crissic

  • BoltVM's yearly deals are impressive.

  • BoltVM. Excellent performance, uptime & support. I cancelled Crissic for poor performance.

    Thanked by 1earl
  • perennateperennate Member, Host Rep

    goodone said: Like kind of services they provide, chat response time.. do they make scheduled backup?. Are they trustworthy in the market?. how much uptime or any DDoS protection?

    I don't think any of those offer DDoS filtering or automatic backups (certainly not for free).

  • NyrNyr Community Contributor, Veteran

    Crissic is probably the best long-term option if you want a decent service.

  • 4n0nx4n0nx Member

    BoltVM is marvellous. Great performance and 24/7 support with very impressive response times.

  • samblingsambling Member
    edited April 2015

    Crissic.net, no question. Skylar's a great guy. Service is top notch. :D

  • blackblack Member

    I've use/used boltVM & VMBox.co. They're both great.

    Thanked by 1StevenN
  • rokokrokok Member

    BoltVM but lightning SSD plan :)

  • FritzFritz Veteran

    BoltVM.

  • +1 for Crissic.net. They are superb.

  • BoltVM, VMbox, Crissic, FtpIT are all good IMO.

    Thanked by 1StevenN
  • goodonegoodone Member
    edited April 2015

    @sambling said:
    Crissic.net, no question. Skylar's a great guy. Service is top notch. :D
    @Nyr said:
    Crissic is probably the best long-term option if you want a decent service.
    @jvnadr said:
    I would go with crissic
    @TheKiller said:
    +1 for Crissic.net. They are superb.

    Do Crissic comes up with Scheduled vps backup like daily/weekly?. and do they have DDoS protection?. How will their system load act if I run above applications on server. Have you tried this this before on your server?

  • goodonegoodone Member
    edited April 2015

    @Fritz said:
    BoltVM.
    @rokok said:
    BoltVM but lightning SSD plan :)
    @black said:
    I've use/used boltVM & VMBox.co. They're both great.
    @4n0nx said:
    BoltVM is marvellous. Great performance and 24/7 support with very impressive response times.
    @linuxthefish said:
    BoltVM's yearly deals are impressive.

    Why Crissic wining over BoltVM?. Crisis do provide large storage with more cores?.
    Do BoltVM provide any DDoS filtering or automatic backup?.

  • @sleddog said:
    BoltVM. Excellent performance, uptime & support. I cancelled Crissic for poor performance.

    What kind of performance issue you had in Crissic and What is your present performance now in BoltVM?.

  • If anyone can do this favour and provide this below please.

    BoltVM - Thunder 2048 :- BenchMARK, Uptime for last 2 month

    and Crissic - OVZ2048 :- BenchMark. Uptime for last 2 month.

    Thanks.

  • I'm curious, how did you manage to snag a 2gb lightning for $18?

  • Do you know anything about this?. The host was once banned....

    @mpkossen said:
    I've spoken to Steven and am confident he'll take more care of his clients and servers.
    @Steven_F said:
    To clarify, the ban had nothing to do with our clients or nodes or services. It was a simple misunderstanding, as evident by our return.

    lowendtalk.com/discussion/45516/boltvm-last-chance-on-deal-la-nj-ssd-ssd-cached-vps

  • 4n0nx4n0nx Member

    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz

    ^ BoltVM, same plan as rokok except 200GB SSD cached HDD

    Their 24/7 tech support rocks :)) Ticket replies within minutes! Always for me so far.

  • @4n0nx said:
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz

    ^ BoltVM, same plan as rokok except 200GB SSD cached HDD

    Their 24/7 tech support rocks :)) Ticket replies within minutes! Always for me so far.

    Which is best pure SSD or SSD Caching for cms web hosting?. (no ngix/varnish but apache)

  • 4n0nx4n0nx Member

    goodone said:

    Which is best pure SSD or SSD Caching for cms web hosting?. (no ngix/varnish but apache)

    SSD is better I guess, but I have not had a page big enough that SSD would make a difference...

  • goodone said: Which is best pure SSD or SSD Caching for cms web hosting?. (no ngix/varnish but apache)

    SSD cached, you don't need pure SSD!

  • @linuxthefish said:
    SSD cached, you don't need pure SSD!

    Do I also accept this as it is good for mysql, innodb, clamav, fail2ban within a control panel?. Because this mysql use too much I/O when this process runs.

    Thanks :)

  • Both FtpIt and BoltVM are really good (IMHO better than HudsonValleyHost and Crissic). I haven't tried the two others. And SSD is better for web serving pages.

  • goodonegoodone Member
    edited April 2015

    @hostingwizard_net said:
    Both FtpIt and BoltVM are really good (IMHO better than HudsonValleyHost and Crissic). I haven't tried the two others. And SSD is better for web serving pages.

    Can I accept SSD catch on this opinion?. or it need to be pure SSD?.

    Because...

    @linuxthefish said:
    SSD cached, you don't need pure SSD!

  • @goodone it's based on how big is your site, how many visitors...

    I have few sites running on pure HDD and never have any problems about disk IO

  • @comXyz said:
    goodone it's based on how big is your site, how many visitors...

    I have few sites running on pure HDD and never have any problems about disk IO

    100k visitor per month.

    I face problem on pure HDD disk I/O

    I use control panel.

  • 100k visitors per month, I think it's better to get a small dedi from Kimsufi / Online.net

Sign In or Register to comment.