Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In with OpenID
Advertise on LowEndTalk.com

In this Discussion

StormVZ Benchmark

Comments

  • dominicldominicl Member
    edited September 2012

    And for people that can't be bothered to click the link:

       #    #  #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #
       #    #  ##   #  #   #  #           #    #  #       ##   #  #    #  #    #
       #    #  # #  #  #    ##            #####   #####   # #  #  #       ######
       #    #  #  # #  #    ##            #    #  #       #  # #  #       #    #
       #    #  #   ##  #   #  #           #    #  #       #   ##  #    #  #    #
        ####   #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #
    
       Version 5.1.3                      Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
    
       Multi-CPU version                  Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
                                          Sunnyvale, CA, USA
       January 13, 2011                   johantheghost at yahoo period com
    
    
    1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3
    
    1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    1 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Process Creation  1 2 3
    
    1 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3
    
    1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3
    
    4 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    4 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    4 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3
    
    4 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    4 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    4 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    4 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    4 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    4 x Process Creation  1 2 3
    
    4 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    4 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3
    
    4 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3
    
    ========================================================================
       BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
    
       System: svz.dominicl.me: GNU/Linux
       OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-042stab057.1 -- #1 SMP Fri Jun 22 02:17:07 MSD 2012
       Machine: i686 (i386)
       Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
       CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6386.0 bogomips)
              Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
       CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6384.7 bogomips)
              Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
       CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6384.7 bogomips)
              Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
       CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6384.7 bogomips)
              Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
       15:34:01 up  2:28,  0 users,  load average: 0.01, 1.17, 2.56; runlevel 3
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Benchmark Run: Sat Sep 08 2012 15:34:01 - 16:02:11
    4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables       16645330.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone                     2783.7 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput                               5243.3 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        884573.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          236901.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       2156321.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput                             1731396.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching                 180182.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation                              16714.1 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   8804.1 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   2684.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead                        2030896.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    
    System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   16645330.3   1426.3
    Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2783.7    506.1
    Execl Throughput                                 43.0       5243.3   1219.4
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     884573.8   2233.8
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     236901.4   1431.4
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    2156321.8   3717.8
    Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1731396.5   1391.8
    Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     180182.9    450.5
    Process Creation                                126.0      16714.1   1326.5
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       8804.1   2076.4
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       2684.6   4474.3
    System Call Overhead                          15000.0    2030896.2   1353.9
                                                                       ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1478.9
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Benchmark Run: Sat Sep 08 2012 16:02:11 - 16:30:25
    4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables       53421334.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone                    10641.3 MWIPS (9.6 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput                              22401.1 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        889859.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          230280.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       2595179.8 KBps  (30.1 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput                             5686742.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching                 534018.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation                              49078.7 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  20578.2 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   2444.7 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead                        6027429.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    
    System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   53421334.5   4577.7
    Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      10641.3   1934.8
    Execl Throughput                                 43.0      22401.1   5209.6
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     889859.3   2247.1
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     230280.6   1391.4
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    2595179.8   4474.4
    Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    5686742.2   4571.3
    Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     534018.3   1335.0
    Process Creation                                126.0      49078.7   3895.1
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      20578.2   4853.4
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       2444.7   4074.5
    System Call Overhead                          15000.0    6027429.6   4018.3
                                                                       ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score                                        3215.0
    Thanked by 1Asim
  • IO Ping:

    ioping -c 10
    request=1 time=3.7 ms
    request=2 time=9.3 ms
    request=3 time=9.3 ms
    request=4 time=4.5 ms
    request=5 time=5.5 ms
    request=6 time=30.3 ms
    request=7 time=0.2 ms
    request=8 time=37.6 ms
    request=9 time=5.1 ms
    request=10 time=30.1 ms
    
    10 requests completed in 9136.4 ms, 74 iops, 0.3 mb/s

    DD:

    dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=1M count=1k conv=fdatasync
    7.66753 seconds, 140 MB/s
    dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
    9.35573 seconds, 115 MB/s
    dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=1M count=1k oflag=dsync
    39.0757 seconds, 27.5 MB/s
    dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=64k count=16k oflag=dsync
    4136.65 seconds, 260 kB/s
  • Cachefly     44.9 MB/s
    Linode, Atlanta, GA, USA     3.07 MB/s
    Linode, Dallas, TX, USA  4.31 MB/s
    Linode, Tokyo, JP    4.32 MB/s
    Linode, London, UK   58.3 MB/s
    OVH, Paris, France   25.8 MB/s
    SmartDC, Rotterdam, Netherlands  16.4 MB/s
    Hetzner, Nuremberg, Germany  66.2 MB/s
    iiNet, Perth, WA, Australia  6.15 MB/s
    Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL, USA   65.3 MB/s
    Softlayer, Singapore     4.05 MB/s
    Softlayer, Seattle, WA, USA  7.83 MB/s
    Softlayer, San Jose, CA, USA     12.4 MB/s
    Softlayer, Washington, DC, USA   668 KB/s
    

    SimpleNode | Minecraft and VPS Hosting | KVM and OpenVZ | Dallas, TX and Phoenix, AZ | PayPal and BitCoins accepted

  • Thanks :P

  • Awesome, thanks

    Thanked by 1dominicl
  • Freevps bench

    wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash
    CPU model :  Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz
    Number of cores : 4
    CPU frequency :  3192.987 MHz
    Total amount of ram : 256 MB
    Total amount of swap : 0 MB
    System uptime :   5 min,
    Download speed from CacheFly: 65.3MB/s
    Download speed from Linode, Atlanta GA: 3.40MB/s
    Download speed from Linode, Dallas, TX: 828KB/s
    Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 1.07MB/s
    Download speed from Linode, London, UK: 95.5MB/s
    Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 63.3MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 7.52MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 8.00MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 12.9MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 12.2MB/s
    I/O speed :  129 MB/s
    

    PS : Emails from whmcs were sitting at spam folder. just a pointer to the host and the people who were expecting the welcome mails.

    NameSilo .com/net/org $1 LESS: NODADDY / SILODEAL
    For Sale : RootVM(com)+50u Gapps / VPSFreak(com)
    Thanked by 1Patrick
  • there is no problem for yahoo mail. mails are all in inbox.

    root@storm:~# wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash
    CPU model :  Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz
    Number of cores : 4
    CPU frequency :  3192.987 MHz
    Total amount of ram : 256 MB
    Total amount of swap : 0 MB
    System uptime :   6:22,
    Download speed from CacheFly: 84.6MB/s
    Download speed from Linode, Atlanta GA: 2.87MB/s
    Download speed from Linode, Dallas, TX: 1.81MB/s
    Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 1.44MB/s
    Download speed from Linode, London, UK: 21.8MB/s
    Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 64.8MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 7.25MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 8.06MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 12.6MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 14.9MB/s
    I/O speed :  110 MB/s
    
    

    20GB free space in COPY.com (opens in a new tab)(really...)

    Thanked by 1Patrick
  • Thanks for that guys! Good to see stable results coming through

    Patrick ~ INIZ Rep

    | Inactive
  • Pretty good results here also. :)

    CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz Number of cores : 4 CPU frequency : 3192.987 MHz Total amount of ram : 256 MB Total amount of swap : 0 MB Download speed from CacheFly: 38.7MB/s Download speed from Linode, Atlanta GA: 3.42MB/s Download speed from Linode, Dallas, TX: 4.19MB/s Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 989KB/s Download speed from Linode, London, UK: 97.7MB/s Download speed from LeaseWeb, Haarlem, NL: 56.7MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 7.24MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 8.07MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 12.7MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 12.3MB/s I/O speed : 131 MB/s

    Thanked by 1Patrick
  • shinshin Member
    edited September 2012

    Is this from their free vps trial? tun/tap enabled?

  • @shin Yes and yes :)

    Patrick ~ INIZ Rep

    | Inactive
  • Nice and good

    For the first time I found europe vps, which has low latency to my country.

    Ping statistics for 109.200.26.***: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 220ms, Maximum = 221ms, Average = 220ms

    Rarely connections from indonesia to europe countries without going through usa.

    1 2 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.1.1 2 20 ms 19 ms 25 ms 180..112.1 3 49 ms 23 ms 22 ms 189.subnet125-160-11.speedy.telkom.net.id [125.1 60.11.189] 4 19 ms 18 ms 30 ms 61.94.114.101 5 45 ms 42 ms 43 ms 226.128.240.180.telin.sg [180.240.128.226] 6 40 ms 40 ms 41 ms 225.128.240.180.telin.sg [180.240.128.225] 7 43 ms 82 ms 41 ms ix-0-1-3-0.tcore2.SVW-Singapore.as6453.net [180. 87.15.117] 8 220 ms 220 ms 218 ms if-10-2.tcore1.MLV-Mumbai.as6453.net [180.87.15. 146] 9 225 ms * 217 ms if-9-5.tcore1.WYN-Marseille.as6453.net [80.231.2 17.17] 10 220 ms 225 ms 222 ms if-2-2.tcore2.WYN-Marseille.as6453.net [80.231.2 17.2] 11 226 ms 224 ms 225 ms if-9-2.tcore2.L78-London.as6453.net [80.231.200. 14] 12 225 ms 216 ms 214 ms Vlan756.icore2.LDN-London.as6453.net [80.231.131 .26] 13 218 ms 218 ms 217 ms Vlan550.icore2.LDN-London.as6453.net [80.231.20. 14] 14 220 ms 221 ms 223 ms h176-227-222-150.host.redstation.co.uk [176.227. 222.150] 15 221 ms 222 ms 221 ms 18-26-200-109.rackcentre.redstation.net.uk [109. 200.26.18] 16 221 ms 222 ms 221 ms ***-26-200-109.rackcentre.redstation.net.uk [109. 200.26.]

    Trace complete.

    Better than usa westcoast connection I think.

    ...

    Thanked by 1Patrick
  • @Bayu Thanks for the comment! We do love our DC's network :)

    Patrick ~ INIZ Rep

    | Inactive
  • vpsBoard.com - Now with over 450 members! A friendly community with active discussion. Come join us!

    IRC.FREENODE.NET #vpsBoard - Drop by and say, 'Hello'.
    Thanked by 1Patrick
  • Very good ping/traceroute from Iceland.

    traceroute to 5.152.202.146 (5.152.202.146), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 213.181.99.1 (213.181.99.1) 1.005 ms 1.003 ms 1.187 ms 2 IPnet-gw.157.157.20.29.simnet.is (157.157.20.29) 1.184 ms 1.506 ms 1.512 ms 3 157.157.255.187 (157.157.255.187) 2.196 ms 2.226 ms 2.251 ms 4 172.16.100.201 (172.16.100.201) 40.852 ms 41.284 ms 41.092 ms 5 linx.redstation.net.uk (195.66.225.138) 41.485 ms 41.230 ms 41.494 ms 6 h176-227-222-150.host.redstation.co.uk (176.227.222.150) 44.370 ms 51.702 ms 51.727 ms 7 18-26-200-109.rackcentre.redstation.net.uk (109.200.26.18) 43.944 ms 43.959 ms 43.883 ms 8 h5-152-202-146.host.redstation.co.uk (5.152.202.146) 43.960 ms 43.977 ms 43.988 ms

    Thanked by 1Patrick
  • Ping towards UK and Europe destinations is definitely better than other VPS's I tried before, even the expensive ones. get-iplayer is beautifully fast and CPU is good, too.

    Thanked by 1Patrick
  • PatrickPatrick Member
    edited September 2012

    Good to hear positive reviews, we are in the process of getting a server up in Dallas, Texas in the US right now. Hosted at Limestone network, similar spec CPU but v2 and SSD+SAS setup as this one.

    Shoot me up a PM if you want to test it for a day or two since we are nearly ready for release, not giving a longer term. Will PM back in 24-72hrs.

    Patrick ~ INIZ Rep

    | Inactive
  • @StormVZ said: Hosted at Limestone network, similar spec CPU but v2 and SSD+SAS setup as this one.

    Network is great but if you get any abuse report expect them to nag the heck out of you and If you require support you get predefined response but they are pretty quick to click the button ~5-10 mins

  • LSN, got a node filled with KVM users not booting up properly, after their scheduled RAM upgrade of my node..

    Disclosure: I work for Query Foundry LLC.
    I own DA International Group Ltd.
  • @Jack My account specialist is pretty much on the ball and very nice after some few phone calls we got every info we needed and hopefully won't need much support after setup (Currently being built now)

    Patrick ~ INIZ Rep

    | Inactive
  • @Alex_LiquidHost said: LSN, got a node filled with KVM users not booting up properly, after their scheduled RAM upgrade of my node..

    @Alex_LiquidHost pop up on skype :)

Sign In or Register to comment.