Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In with OpenID
Advertise on LowEndTalk.com

In this Discussion

URPad 1GB OpenVZ SSD Benchmark

URPad 1GB OpenVZ SSD Benchmark

serverbearserverbear Member
edited August 2012 in General

Kevin kindly gave me a box to test today for his upcoming LEB exclusive offer (I'll not spoil the offer, but it's looking quite nice).

Here's a benchmark of the plan:

Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz

UnixBench

Benchmark Run: Wed Aug 22 2012 08:35:08 - 09:03:16
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       88844585.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                    13030.8 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                              24155.0 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       1187006.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          324062.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       3470534.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             4504468.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 495742.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              54025.0 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  22220.3 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   2434.9 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        3157551.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   88844585.8   7613.1
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      13030.8   2369.2
Execl Throughput                                 43.0      24155.0   5617.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0    1187006.7   2997.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     324062.7   1958.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    3470534.6   5983.7
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    4504468.0   3621.0
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     495742.0   1239.4
Process Creation                                126.0      54025.0   4287.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      22220.3   5240.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       2434.9   4058.1
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    3157551.2   2105.0
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        3471.7

IOPS

ioping -c 10
request=1 time=0.2 ms
request=2 time=0.6 ms
request=3 time=0.5 ms
request=4 time=0.6 ms
request=5 time=0.5 ms
request=6 time=0.5 ms
request=7 time=0.5 ms
request=8 time=0.5 ms
request=9 time=0.6 ms
request=10 time=0.5 ms

10 requests completed in 9006.3 ms, 1970 iops, 7.7 mb/s

ioping -RD
5568 iops, 21.8 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.2/1.9/0.0 ms

dd

dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=1M count=1k conv=fdatasync
1.22977 s, 873 MB/s

dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
1.25655 s, 855 MB/s

Network

Cachefly    10.2 MB/s
Linode, Atlanta, GA, USA     10.9 MB/s
Linode, Dallas, TX, USA  11.2 MB/s
Linode, Tokyo, JP    6.53 MB/s
Linode, London, UK   2.76 MB/s
OVH, Paris, France   6.88 MB/s
SmartDC, Rotterdam, Netherlands  9.95 MB/s
Hetzner, Nuremberg, Germany  5.08 MB/s
iiNet, Perth, WA, Australia  3.33 MB/s
Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL, USA   9.57 MB/s
Softlayer, Singapore     5.28 MB/s
Softlayer, Seattle, WA, USA  10.0 MB/s
Softlayer, San Jose, CA, USA     4.46 MB/s
Softlayer, Washington, DC, USA   10.5 MB/s

Trace

Traceroute (cachefly.cachefly.net): traceroute to cachefly.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  199.231.227.2 (199.231.227.2)  0.027 ms  0.008 ms  0.007 ms
 2  ae-10.border1.dal006.ionity.com (199.231.224.5)  0.283 ms  0.284 ms  0.276 ms
 3  63.251.44.9 (63.251.44.9)  0.539 ms  0.535 ms  0.526 ms
 4  core3.pc1-bbnet1.ext1a.dal.pnap.net (216.52.191.41)  1.381 ms  1.375 ms  1.375 ms
 5  dax-edge-03.inet.qwest.net (67.133.189.93)  1.355 ms  1.686 ms  1.343 ms
 6  dap-brdr-04.inet.qwest.net (205.171.25.30)  2.430 ms  3.734 ms  3.722 ms
 7  te8-4-10G.ar3.DAL2.gblx.net (64.208.110.201)  4.002 ms  1.450 ms  1.431 ms
 8  vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175)  1.113 ms  1.114 ms  1.106 ms

Full Report: http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2012/08/22/hq4pjlqjxz3vxuls

I'll probably pick up one of these myself, looking forward to the offer!

ServerBear - Easy UnixBench/dd/IOPS/FIO (NEW) & Network Benchmarks | Example Report | Compare Low End Boxes
Gleam - Run kick-ass viral competitions & rewards to grow your userbase. Free until Sept.
Tagged:
Thanked by 1laaev

Comments

  • Nice!

    by the way, the tags are < pre >

    Catalyst Host - Pie Approved!
  • Ye, just fixed it up. Thanks!

    ServerBear - Easy UnixBench/dd/IOPS/FIO (NEW) & Network Benchmarks | Example Report | Compare Low End Boxes
    Gleam - Run kick-ass viral competitions & rewards to grow your userbase. Free until Sept.
    Thanked by 1HalfEatenPie
  • Seems like many provider is having great io todays :)

    My blog | Server Uptime | I'm not working for any providers in here, all my comments just my own opinion.image
  • Not sure how many people are on that node, maybe @FTN_Kevin can confirm.

    ServerBear - Easy UnixBench/dd/IOPS/FIO (NEW) & Network Benchmarks | Example Report | Compare Low End Boxes
    Gleam - Run kick-ass viral competitions & rewards to grow your userbase. Free until Sept.
  • @serverbear said: Not sure how many people are on that node, maybe @FTN_Kevin can confirm.

    >

    Just your self :p

    I know, I'm Dale Maily.

  • TazTaz Disabled
    edited August 2012

    {Removed per request }

    Time is good and also bad. Life is short and that is sad. Dont worry be happy thats my style. No matter what happens i won't lose my smile!

  • ChrisMillerChrisMiller Member
    edited August 2012

    @serverbear said: Not sure how many people are on that node, maybe @FTN_Kevin can confirm.

    There is quite a few now, and there was quite afew when I had Kevin give you the VM to run the tests. That goes to show how well these SSD's are performing on this node.

    Even if the server node was at 100% capacity, a typical user would not notice any performance issues even if a serveral users were running high I/O applications.

    vpsBoard.com - Now with NEARLY 2000 ACTIVE MEMBERS! A friendly community with active discussion. Come join us!

    VirtuaClub.com - Los Angeles! OnApp powered cloud starting at $2.48/Month for the first 3 months! Coupon code: ITCOMESIN3S

  • @FTNChris said: Even if the server node was at 100% capacity, a typical user would not notice any performance issues even if a serveral users were running high I/O applications.

    This is exactly why I approve of this new "SSD VPS" fad. It's almost like you're on the box by yourself.

    Check out my blog at rubiverse.net
    Thanked by 1laaev
  • johnjohn Member

    Nice sequential speeds. The ioping results look a bit high for SSDs.

    SSDVirt | SSD VPS Hosting
    Thanked by 1laaev
  • Very nice results!

    [email protected]
    Thanked by 1laaev
  • TazTaz Disabled

    Is it raid1 or 10?

    Time is good and also bad. Life is short and that is sad. Dont worry be happy thats my style. No matter what happens i won't lose my smile!

  • @flam316 said: This is exactly why I approve of this new "SSD VPS" fad. It's almost like you're on the box by yourself.

    I agree, pretty much guarantees ultra fast and stable speeds to the VPS container at all times.

    @john said: Nice sequential speeds. The ioping results look a bit high for SSDs.

    @Jeffrey said: Very nice results!

    Thanks guys.

    @Taz_NinjaHawk said: Is it raid1 or 10?

    10

  • @FTN_Kevin: When will this offer be available? I'm interested in trying some SSD VPS, was looking at RAMNode as well.

  • @novocaine said: @FTN_Kevin: When will this offer be available? I'm interested in trying some SSD VPS, was looking at RAMNode as well.

    Hello Novocaine,

    It already is: http://www.urpad.net/ssd-linux-vps.shtml

    Let me know if you have any questions. :)

    vpsBoard.com - Now with NEARLY 2000 ACTIVE MEMBERS! A friendly community with active discussion. Come join us!

    VirtuaClub.com - Los Angeles! OnApp powered cloud starting at $2.48/Month for the first 3 months! Coupon code: ITCOMESIN3S

Sign In or Register to comment.