New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
RamNode 512MB 6GB SSD 1000GB E3-1230v2s and Samsung 830s Benchmark
ErawanArifNugroho
Member
First of all, let me thank to @Nick_A at RamNode for giving me a vps for running the Benchmark 
System: 2 Core 512mb/512mb vswap 6GB SSD 1000GB BW 1Gbit port Node DallasSSDVZ2 CentOS 5 64-bit
So, here we go with the results :
# wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz Number of cores : 2 CPU frequency : 3299.960 MHz Total amount of ram : 512 MB Total amount of swap : 512 MB System uptime : 0 min, Download speed from CacheFly: 79.0MB/s Download speed from Linode, Atlanta GA: 14.5MB/s Download speed from Linode, Dallas, TX: 81.7MB/s Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 7.75MB/s Download speed from Linode, London, UK: 9.25MB/s Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 12.3MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 8.35MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 26.4MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 43.2MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 30.6MB/s I/O speed : 425 MB/s
# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 58 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz stepping : 9 cpu MHz : 3299.960 cache size : 8192 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 8 core id : 0 cpu cores : 4 apicid : 0 initial apicid : 0 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 13 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase smep erms bogomips : 6599.92 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: processor : 1 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 58 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz stepping : 9 cpu MHz : 3299.960 cache size : 8192 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 8 core id : 1 cpu cores : 4 apicid : 2 initial apicid : 2 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 13 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase smep erms bogomips : 6598.97 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
Comments
Download Test :
IO Test :
IOPING :
Unix Bench :
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ###### # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith, Sunnyvale, CA, USA January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com 1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Process Creation 1 2 3 1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3 1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3 2 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3 2 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3 2 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3 2 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3 2 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 x Process Creation 1 2 3 2 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3 2 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3 ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3) System: bench: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-042stab057.1 -- #1 SMP Fri Jun 22 02:17:07 MSD 2012 Machine: x86_64 (x86_64) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz (6599.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz (6599.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization 07:19:49 up 5:27, 2 users, load average: 0.05, 0.05, 0.01; runlevel 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Thu Jul 05 2012 07:19:49 - 07:47:53 2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 21731071.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3914.8 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 5331.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1047622.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 282793.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2519696.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2011217.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 224416.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 16923.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 10059.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1475.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2575777.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 21731071.5 1862.1 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3914.8 711.8 Execl Throughput 43.0 5331.9 1240.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1047622.2 2645.5 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 282793.2 1708.7 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2519696.6 4344.3 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2011217.2 1616.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 224416.3 561.0 Process Creation 126.0 16923.9 1343.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 10059.5 2372.5 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1475.9 2459.8 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2575777.3 1717.2 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1645.5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Thu Jul 05 2012 07:47:53 - 08:15:58 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 43223170.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 7843.0 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 10957.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1321066.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 342657.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3796285.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 4028693.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 335950.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 29273.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 13121.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1366.9 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 4408179.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 43223170.0 3703.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 7843.0 1426.0 Execl Throughput 43.0 10957.0 2548.1 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1321066.5 3336.0 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 342657.3 2070.4 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3796285.2 6545.3 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 4028693.0 3238.5 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 335950.5 839.9 Process Creation 126.0 29273.1 2323.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 13121.3 3094.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1366.9 2278.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 4408179.1 2938.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 2561.2Picked one up to
root@site:~# wget cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.bin
--2012-07-15 17:42:21-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.bin
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to:
100mb.bin' 100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 63.0M/s in 1.6s 2012-07-15 17:42:23 (63.0 MB/s) -100mb.bin' saved [104857600/104857600]Really good connection!
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 3.54726 s, 303 MB/s
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 3.30051 s, 325 MB/s
Pretty amazing disk IO considering I'm paying $10 quarter :P
what plan is that? (specs etc)
256MB RAM
256MB VSwap
1 Core @ 3.2GHz
4GB RAID10 SSD
500GB Bandwidth
I think that fits our mission statement... "More power than you know what to do with at a price you can afford" etc.
So true. I don't know what to do with it!
Its like having too much ketchup packets with my fries!
Add three reboots first month to
We use RamNode VPS servers to provide DNS servers for our own customers and I can vouch that the performance and service is awesome!
Save them, it is inevitable you forget one time.
The Atlanta hardware performs ever better (sorry don't have a 256, just a 1GB):
http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2012/9/10/CG4KPcgbRUVTw4fd
Old thread resurrection, nice.
Didn't even notice that O_o
Yep, we no longer offer new orders on the hardware in question here.
Grabbed a 512KVM and migrated all of my VPS6 sites to it. IT. IS. SO. FREAKING. FAST.
@Nick_A - thanks for the flexibility on disk space by the way!
Another vps review by uncle Erawan.. +1.
Erawan does do some nice reviews. I need to visit his blog more
he is not uncle just yet, 20+ of age is not uncle
right Erawan? 
Right
I'm just 26
4 more years=) and i will call you uncle
I was an uncle at 22, so age isn't much of a factor.
Anyway, if this thread is going to stay alive, I think it's time for an updated benchmark... This one is very outdated.
Careful or @Randy will start calling you daddy.
Hi daddy ;-) as requested ;-)
:sigh:
Hehehe... Sorry I was slept last night.
Maybe I will post the benchmark of the KVM SSD 256MB.
I already have several cousin and nephew
One of the best hosts out there!
Amazing support, amazing servers, amazing uptime and stability. Just thought I'd share
where are exactly the servers of this plan located?
That particular VPS was/is in Dallas, but our current offerings are in Atlanta on different hardware (much improved). I only offer Dallas VPSs upon request at this time.
If you're interested in our current promos, check out our new thread in the Offers section.
Abusing @Nick_A node yesterday.
http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2012/09/16/BH8Pam2mtADBJHrT