Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


From $9 per year - Los Angeles Unmanaged VPS - PupaVPS
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

From $9 per year - Los Angeles Unmanaged VPS - PupaVPS

PupaVPS is offering high performance VPS starting at $9/yr.

Datacenter Location: Los Angeles, US.
Network Provider: GTT, Zayo, Cogent, China Unicom, China Telecom
Looking glass: http://lg-lax.pupavps.com/

========================================
VZ128 Plan
RAM: 128MB
VSwap: 128MB
CPU: 1 Core
HDD: 7GB RAID10
Bandwidth: 500GB
IP Address: 1 IP Address
$9/yr for life
[ORDER LINK] Coupon: SAVEMONEY

VZ256 Plan
RAM: 256MB
VSwap: 256MB
CPU: 1 Core
HDD: 15GB RAID10
Bandwidth: 1000GB
IP Address: 1 IP Address
$1.78/mo for life
[ORDER LINK] Coupon: SAVEMONEY

VZ512 Plan
RAM: 512MB
VSwap: 512MB
CPU: 2 Core
HDD: 30GB RAID10
Bandwidth: 2000GB
IP Address: 2 IP Addresses
$3.57/mo for life
[ORDER LINK] Coupon: PUPA40

VZ1024 Plan
RAM: 1GB
VSwap: 1GB
CPU: 4 Core
HDD: 45GB RAID10
Bandwidth: 3000GB
IP Address: 4 IP Addresses
$6.57/mo for life
[ORDER LINK] Coupon: PUPA40

We are also offering 1-day trial plan. Why not have a try?

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or mail info [at] pupavps.com.

Comments

  • Looking Glass Down = =

  • NyrNyr Community Contributor, Veteran

    @pupavps said:

    Datacenter Location: Los Angeles, US.
    Network Provider: GTT, Zayo, Cogent, China Unicom, China Telecom

    Do you think your customers are stupid?

    http://bgp.he.net/AS15003

  • China provider peering is private. Same goes for QuadraNet CU transit.

  • nullnull said: China provider peering is private. Same goes for QuadraNet CU transit.

    Is the China Telecom private peering via GTT?

    traceroute to www.chinatelecom.com.cn (211.100.35.132), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 108.62.39.90.rdns.as15003.net (108.62.39.90) 0.029 ms 0.009 ms 0.008 ms 2 v3500.er01.lax.as15003.net (23.80.6.137) 0.249 ms 0.238 ms 0.227 ms 3 69.31.114.133 (69.31.114.133) 0.320 ms 0.315 ms 0.338 ms 4 ae2-50g.ar1.lax2.us.as4436.gtt.net (69.31.124.85) 2.332 ms * 5.038 ms 5 ip-69-31-124-30.gtt.net (69.31.124.30) 3.077 ms 3.070 ms ip-69-31-124-26.gtt.net (69.31.124.26) 3.060 ms 6 202.97.49.29 (202.97.49.29) 1.417 ms 4.489 ms 4.474 ms 7 202.97.58.125 (202.97.58.125) 255.278 ms 257.420 ms 257.407 ms 8 202.97.53.233 (202.97.53.233) 253.561 ms 253.556 ms 253.581 ms 9 202.97.53.85 (202.97.53.85) 255.114 ms 254.607 ms 254.593 ms 10 180.149.128.182 (180.149.128.182) 255.907 ms * * 11 220.181.16.6 (220.181.16.6) 253.529 ms 253.573 ms 253.610 ms 12 211.100.2.197 (211.100.2.197) 372.148 ms * 211.100.2.193 (211.100.2.193) 263.486 ms 13 * * * 14 * * * -- Traceroute timed out --

  • @concerto49 said:


    traceroute to 61.139.2.69 (61.139.2.69), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
    1 108.62.39.90.rdns.as15003.net (108.62.39.90) 0.027 ms 0.009 ms 0.008 ms
    2 v3500.er01.lax.as15003.net (23.80.6.137) 0.255 ms 0.230 ms 0.217 ms
    3 218.30.54.185 (218.30.54.185) 0.566 ms 0.559 ms 0.594 ms
    4 202.97.52.245 (202.97.52.245) 5.043 ms 5.038 ms 5.025 ms
    5 202.97.52.161 (202.97.52.161) 269.584 ms 269.577 ms 269.568 ms
    6 202.97.60.81 (202.97.60.81) 266.959 ms 266.926 ms 266.963 ms
    7 202.97.35.197 (202.97.35.197) 260.690 ms 202.97.33.169 (202.97.33.169) 271.169 ms 202.97.35.241 (202.97.35.241) 271.443 ms
    8 202.97.45.42 (202.97.45.42) 313.146 ms 313.122 ms 313.121 ms
    9 * * *
    10 61.139.113.58 (61.139.113.58) 307.554 ms 307.381 ms 307.538 ms
    11 ns.sc.cninfo.net (61.139.2.69) 305.939 ms 307.773 ms 307.138 ms

  • concerto49concerto49 Member
    edited September 2014

    nullnull said: traceroute to 61.139.2.69 (61.139.2.69), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets

    1 108.62.39.90.rdns.as15003.net (108.62.39.90) 0.027 ms 0.009 ms 0.008 ms
    2 v3500.er01.lax.as15003.net (23.80.6.137) 0.255 ms 0.230 ms 0.217 ms
    3 218.30.54.185 (218.30.54.185) 0.566 ms 0.559 ms 0.594 ms
    4 202.97.52.245 (202.97.52.245) 5.043 ms 5.038 ms 5.025 ms
    5 202.97.52.161 (202.97.52.161) 269.584 ms 269.577 ms 269.568 ms
    6 202.97.60.81 (202.97.60.81) 266.959 ms 266.926 ms 266.963 ms
    7 202.97.35.197 (202.97.35.197) 260.690 ms 202.97.33.169 (202.97.33.169) 271.169 ms 202.97.35.241 (202.97.35.241) 271.443 ms
    8 202.97.45.42 (202.97.45.42) 313.146 ms 313.122 ms 313.121 ms
    9 * * *
    10 61.139.113.58 (61.139.113.58) 307.554 ms 307.381 ms 307.538 ms
    11 ns.sc.cninfo.net (61.139.2.69) 305.939 ms 307.773 ms 307.138 ms

    So is it CT or not?

  • nullnullnullnull Member
    edited September 2014

    @concerto49 said:

    61.139.2.69 is China Telecom Sichuan Province Public DNS

    http://bgp.he.net/ip/61.139.2.69

    And 202.97.x.x is China Telecom Backbone.

    concerto49 said: So is it CT or not?

    Yes. And the conclusion is that it is only a partial peering ?

  • 202.106.196.115 is China Unicom Beijing Province Public DNS.Good speed:)

  • Thanks @nullnull. @Nyr, test from China then you'll see China Telecom connection. The routing optimization to China is a complex work, sometimes outgoing may change to ensure stability. We are using ubiquityhosting LA datacenter, you can confirm peer info with them.

  • Hi,Most Chinese people will use this web test.

    http://www.webkaka.com/Tracert.aspx

    http://www.webkaka.com/Ping.aspx

    I tell you What is the optimal line。

    test this IP:192.126.113.1 or 162.212.180.1

Sign In or Register to comment.