Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


1.99EUR Online.net server + Proxmox with NAT (Lowendspirit style) + Backup
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

1.99EUR Online.net server + Proxmox with NAT (Lowendspirit style) + Backup

pbalazs123pbalazs123 Member
edited August 2014 in Tutorials

Well guys i've decided to write a tutorial about this. I'm still testing it, but when it's ready i will post the details.

The idea is based on Lowendspirit but with my own cheap online.net server. Run a few 128MB RAM/2GB HDD OVZ containers on it (5-6) with ports forwarded coz i only got 1 IPV4 address and able to backup these CTs to the free 100GB backup space that online.net provided with the subscription through FTP.

Poll about Tutorial
  1. Are you interested?124 votes
    1. Yes
      87.90%
    2. No
      12.10%
«1

Comments

  • linuxthefishlinuxthefish Member
    edited August 2014

    You missed the yes option on the poll, but yeah sure it would be cool! With 2gb ram plain OpenVZ with no control panel might be better.

    Thanked by 1marrco
  • iKeyZiKeyZ Veteran

    I'd be interested in this!

  • @linuxthefish said:
    You missed the yes option on the poll, but yeah sure it would be cool! With 2gb ram plain OpenVZ with no control panel might be better.

    Fixed the poll. I can do that version aswell. But first i will do it with Proxmox.

  • sc754sc754 Member
    edited August 2014

    @pbalazs123 said:

    Why not save some cpu and ram by running openvz from the command line?

    Thanked by 1marrco
  • I think OpenVZ would be better, but Proxmox would be cool as well. Would love a couple separate containers to run things in.

  • NeoonNeoon Community Contributor, Veteran

    Proxmox Supports KVM and OpenVZ so dont matter.

  • very interrested, i only recently saw the benefits of proxmox and would love to give it a try..

  • @sc754 said:
    Why not save some cpu and ram by running openvz from the command line?

    Sure, i will do pure cmd line version aswell. Right now i'm testing with Proxmox panel.

    Thanked by 1AlexanderM
  • @mikeyur said:
    I think OpenVZ would be better, but Proxmox would be cool as well. Would love a couple separate containers to run things in.

    Proxmox is a control panel for OVZ containers and KVMs. I'm just testing what would you like to do exactly. :)

  • @Infinity580 said:
    Proxmox Supports KVM and OpenVZ so dont matter.

    +1

  • @Tripleflix said:
    very interrested, i only recently saw the benefits of proxmox and would love to give it a try..

    I will put everything on "paper" soon. :)

  • Don't forget about IPv6 :)

  • @0xdragon said:
    Don't forget about IPv6 :)

    I know. :)) I have to put that in the config aswell.

  • I would be interested to see this :)

  • akzakz Member

    would absolutely love to see this. Was thinking of giving this a try after much thought of what to do with my online.net server.

  • sonicsonic Veteran

    Yes, sure

  • +1

  • netomxnetomx Moderator, Veteran

    Why proxmox and not Feathur (OpenVZ) ?

  • rskrsk Member, Patron Provider

    said: 1.99EUR Online.net server

    I am not trying to burst your bubble, but the 1.99eur online.net server comes with a tiny cpu and a single hdd ...

    I see cpu load issues, as well as i/o.

    Other than that, it is a good idea if you can find a better/alternative node to house the virtual machines.

  • and iptables if possible.

  • AnthonySmithAnthonySmith Member, Patron Provider

    NICE haha :)

    Proxmox does IPv6 now or are you planning to handle it manually?

  • @rsk said:

    O rly? :))) Dude this is an experiment lol. Won't care about load issues or anything else. :)

  • @AnthonySmith said:
    NICE haha :)

    Proxmox does IPv6 now or are you planning to handle it manually?

    Thanks! :)

    I don't know yet, but i know i have to use that dibbler-client to announce my prefix.

  • rskrsk Member, Patron Provider

    pbalazs123 said: O rly? :))) Dude this is an experiment lol. Won't care about load issues or anything else. :)

    If the VMs are for you, then I guess that is fine. If you are planning to sell, I stand by my previous comment :P

    Good luck.

  • netomx said: Feathur (OpenVZ) ?

    Because Feathur sucks so far.

    I hope to see both a Proxmox guide and a guide for just OpenVZ. :)

  • netomxnetomx Moderator, Veteran

    @David_P said:
    I hope to see both a Proxmox guide and a guide for just OpenVZ. :)

    What's the problem? I am using it and the only 2 problems I have is:

    • template from master to slave
    • the "slave offline" notification without being offline
  • @netomx said:

    • the "slave offline" notification without being offline

    I think that you quoted the wrong line. :P

    Thanked by 1netomx
  • netomxnetomx Moderator, Veteran

    @itgods said:
    I think that you quoted the wrong line. :P

    Sorry, I quoted everything, but I think that's Vanilla's problems

  • @netomx said:

    • the "slave offline" notification without being offline

    Last time I used it IPv6 was impossible. Has that changed yet? Also, isn't it developed by one person?

  • I'm already doing a similar thing with a N2800 OVH server, it holds ~30 clients without an issue, but it has random kernel panics while being under heavy load. With the VIA being 1/3 as strong as the Atom, I guess you can't fit a lot of users there.

Sign In or Register to comment.