-
I haven't seen one of these in a while, since v2 to be honest. So I thought I should start one since no one else has.
The code to do the test:
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasyncHow to post the result:
( name of provider ) / Type of Plan
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 5.71509 s, 188 MB/sErrantWeb - Cheap VPS Services in Metro Detroit
-
dd is all O without any I.
Put some I in with ioping :)
-
You guys are no fun :P
All of these are OpenVZ:
IPXcore, in a VPS container, node Diamond:
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 6.1197 seconds, 175 MB/s
IPXcore, on HN, node Topaz:
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 20.9049 seconds, 51.4 MB/s
URPAD, Kansas City:
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 17.0862 seconds, 62.8 MB/s
Semoweb, Orlando:
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 43.8584 seconds, 24.5 MB/s
Vooservers, Sittingbourne:
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 13.5815 seconds, 79.1 MB/s
EaseVPS, Jacksonville:
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 19.6861 seconds, 54.5 MB/s
Hostpolar, NYC:
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 25.0095 seconds, 42.9 MB/s
Alienlayer, Las Vegas:
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 23.7851 seconds, 45.1 MB/s
VPS6, Istanbul:
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 8.16027 seconds, 132 MB/s
Hostitek, Los Angeles:
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 44.3662 seconds, 24.2 MB/s
BuyVM, San Jose:
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 5.14726 seconds, 209 MB/s
BGSA, Seattle:
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 20.9416 seconds, 51.3 MB/s
Jaystorage, somewhere in France
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 19.0607 seconds, 56.3 MB/s
Low-cost VPS at IPXcore with awesome support.
-
@Damian4IPXcore said: You guys are no fun :P
I just wanted the thread renamed to, "How fast can you O, eh?"
O?
Aye, O. But not IO.
-
HudsonValleyHost, Orlando(I think)
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 27.4832 seconds, 39.1 MB/s
EaseVPS(Kansas City)
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 20.6386 seconds, 52.0 MB/s
█ EaseVPS.com - Budget OpenVZ VPS
-
I've used 2host in the past for side projects and got between 100-200MB/s with pretty low latency. The projects have concluded so I can't test them at the moment.
Matt from SSD Nodes, Inc.
-
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync ; rm -v test
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 4.23552 s, 254 MB/sas tested by one of our clients.
Our new nodes (RAID-10 SAS2) should be faster, I'll do post a test this weekend.
Qenox Networks Inc. - KVM based VPS
-
Holy crap, I didn't know BuyVM was that good! Lol
-
The highest result among several other VPS's, but it may be not so LowEndBox...
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 3,87199 s, 277 MB/svpsunlimited // ХЕN / RAM 1024 Mb / HDD 20 Gb RAID-10
-
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 3.55288 s, 302 MB/s
I'm getting that in a Centos VPS, oddly enough Debian tops out at half. Weird; same node, same spec VPS.
IOPS is much higher though than the SATA nodes.
Qenox Networks Inc. - KVM based VPS
-
Mine range from crappy to quite good, haha.
123Systems | 256/512MB OpenVZ Chicago
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 55.4449 s, 19.4 MB/s
123Systems | 192/384MB OpenVZ Dallas
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 23.67 s, 45.4 MB/s
RAMHost | 128/256MB Kansas City
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 10.9245 s, 98.3 MB/s
SecureDragon | 128MB Xen Jacksonville
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 9.62678 s, 112 MB/s
Chicago VPS | 2048MB OpenVZ Chicago
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 46.8047 s, 22.9 MB/s
Hostigation | 128MB KVM LA
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 8.7932 s, 122 MB/s
-
Whitelabelhosting | 2GB OpenVZ
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 7.2227 s, 149 MB/s
Infinitie | 1GB OpenVZ (SSD)
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 3.99028 s, 269 MB/s
Kiloserve | 555MB KVM
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 3.91004 s, 275 MB/s
-
@Legendlink said: Mine range from crappy to quite good, haha.
One of these isn't at the right order... (crappy big one!)
-
Kiloserve | 384 MB XEN | $38 per year special
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 3.46265 s, 310 MB/s
-
BudgetVM | 256 Xen | $3.75 per month
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 6.23637 seconds, 172 MB/s
Review Bastard | Band of music and movie enthusiast
-
BuyVM node24
root@f:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync && rm test
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 3.94172 s, 272 MB/sHostigation x6la01
root@h:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync && rm test
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 5.98752 s, 179 MB/sRamhost vz1.lax
root@tp:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync && rm test
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 260.635 s, 4.1 MB/sDreamServers.uk.com Free
root@uk:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync && rm test
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 11.7794 s, 91.2 MB/sInfinitie.net sdc1107
root@i:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync && rm test
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 7.96615 s, 135 MB/sJust forgot to add one:
Cloudstra.com Free
root@cloud:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync && rm test
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 13.5386 s, 79.3 MB/sThese are all LEB's I have currently.
-
@Francisco said: On a lot of our newer .32 stuff it's 350 - 400 the majority of the time.
I still get:
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 15.8661 s, 67.7 MB/s
on node25 and It's good enough for me.
and i get:
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 7.12008 seconds, 151 MB/s
on node03 w/c I think is already awesome for the price i paid, though part of me still want to see that 350MB/s :D -
25 isn't redone yet, i'll run a quick abuse pass over 03 and see if I spot anything odd ;)
Some users just don't know how to write SQL queries properly and just go to town on SQL with tiny transactions. If we threw SSD caches in the boxes we wouldn't feel it but ah well.
Francisco
BuyVM - OpenVZ & KVM Based / TUN, PPTP, FUSE, SIT & GRE Enabled! / Stallion Control Panel
Thanked by 1dnom -
@yomero Haha, yes, they are ordered in how I have them saved in putty.
Funny thing is 123Systems considers 19MB/s to be "normal" when I opened a ticket once.
-
ubservers 512Mb -Germany-
[root@serv2 ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 6.53829 seconds, 164 MB/sBuyvm 128Mb -node44-
[root@serv1 ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 6.72588 seconds, 160 MB/s -
RamHost (UK-1, vz69)
vpn:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync && rm test
dd: writing `test': No space left on device
13926+0 records in
13925+0 records out
912596992 bytes (913 MB) copied, 4.99438 s, 183 MB/sRamHost (TinyKVM, vz69)
ts:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync && rm test
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 6.99885 s, 153 MB/sChicagoVPS (1GB Package, Chicago VPS14)
[root@server3 ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync && rm test
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 37.3379 seconds, 28.8 MB/sAsuraHosting (VPS-1024, Master Node)
[root@test ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync && rm test
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 11.7476 seconds, 91.4 MB/sAsuraHosting (VPS-256, Master Node)
[root@ea ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync && rm test
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 13.4359 seconds, 79.9 MB/sAsuraHosting - Unmanaged VPS Services at an Affordable Price starting at $4/month.
-
@AsuraHosting said: ChicagoVPS (1GB Package, Chicago VPS14)
[root@server3 ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync && rm test
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 37.3379 seconds, 28.8 MB/swow ¬_¬!!
@Legendlink said: Funny thing is 123Systems considers 19MB/s to be "normal" when I opened a ticket once.
Completely normal u_u
-
@sleddog dd is all O without any I. Put some I in with ioping :)
Got to agree with this, DD is a poor test for most applications in the real world. Low latency and response to random IO are key.
On our Clustered storage array we get the following
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 21.3775 seconds, 50.2 MB/sNot going to win any IO competition here, but if your application doesn’t need to write at 200MB/sec and availability and low latency are on your shopping list then maybe worth looking at other storage tests
Thanked by 1sleddog -
Guys, can you show some ioping tests here?
ThanksS.
Prometeus.com & IperWeb.com Hosting Provider since 1997
Thanked by 1mina -
@vmhosts said: but if your application doesn’t need to write at 200MB/sec
Some guy here wasn't happy even with 100MB/s because his application lags or sth like that ¬_¬
-
@yomero said: Some guy here wasn't happy even with 100MB/s because his application lags or sth like that ¬_¬
People are never happy.
-
most small writes will be handled by battery backed write cache so fast short speeds are possible. Constant sustained 100MB/sec write requests are not normal and we dont often see this sort of IO.
Thats not to say some applications out there generate this type of IO but if they are a dedicated solution or a VPS provider which can gurantee IO resource maybe a better fit
-
@vmhosts said: Not going to win any IO competition here, but if your application doesn’t need to write at 200MB/sec and availability and low latency are on your shopping list then maybe worth looking at other storage tests
The voice of reason, but it seems few are listening....
-
Doing MUCH better on my AlienVPS now, after being moved from NY12 to NY14, speed went from 40-80MB/s to 80 - 150 MB/s
[root@danielhe Geekbench-2.2.6-Linux]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 11.1096 seconds, 96.7 MB/s
[root@danielhe Geekbench-2.2.6-Linux]#
[root@danielhe Geekbench-2.2.6-Linux]#
[root@danielhe Geekbench-2.2.6-Linux]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 6.9026 seconds, 156 MB/s -
For me it's less that I actually need that high of an I/O and more of I like to see that the providers take pride in their service to give you the best overall performance. Also, that they don't overload their nodes to the point where things seem so sluggish.
-
xx@xx:/tmp/ioping-0.6$ ./ioping -c 5 /tmp 4096 bytes from /tmp (simfs /vz/private/319): request=1 time=0.1 ms 4096 bytes from /tmp (simfs /vz/private/319): request=2 time=0.2 ms 4096 bytes from /tmp (simfs /vz/private/319): request=3 time=0.1 ms 4096 bytes from /tmp (simfs /vz/private/319): request=4 time=0.1 ms 4096 bytes from /tmp (simfs /vz/private/319): request=5 time=0.1 ms --- /tmp (simfs /vz/private/319) ioping statistics --- 5 requests completed in 4001.6 ms, 8375 iops, 32.7 mb/s min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.1/0.2/0.0 ms
I don't really know if its good or bad
-
/tmp is a tmpfs so that doesn't really count :)
try from /root
Francisco
BuyVM - OpenVZ & KVM Based / TUN, PPTP, FUSE, SIT & GRE Enabled! / Stallion Control Panel
-
@Francisco said: /tmp is a tmpfs so that doesn't really count :)
Oh i always thought /tmp was just located on the normal file system.
Anyway here you go with /root/, not much of a difference though
xxx@yyy:/tmp/ioping-0.6$ sudo ./ioping -c 5 /root/ [sudo] password for xxx: 4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /vz/private/319): request=1 time=0.1 ms 4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /vz/private/319): request=2 time=0.1 ms 4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /vz/private/319): request=3 time=0.2 ms 4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /vz/private/319): request=4 time=0.2 ms 4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /vz/private/319): request=5 time=0.1 ms --- /root/ (simfs /vz/private/319) ioping statistics --- 5 requests completed in 4001.5 ms, 7246 iops, 28.3 mb/s min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.1/0.2/0.0 ms
-
@Francisco said: /tmp is a tmpfs so that doesn't really count :)
Are you not mistaking that with /dev/shm ?
Hostigation High Resource Hosting - SolusVM OpenVZ/KVM VPS
-
@miTgiB said: Are you not mistaking that with /dev/shm ?
+1
But, not always. For example my vserver at edis allocates 16MB for /tmp in RAM
-
@Francisco said: /tmp is a tmpfs so that doesn't really count :)
ioping shows that isn't the case....
@gsrdgrdghd said: 4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /vz/private/319): request=1 time=0.1 ms
-
InceptionHosting
[root@mars ~]#dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 8.97836 seconds, 120 MB/s
[root@mars ~]#XenSmart
root@uranus:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 10.5485 s, 102 MB/s
root@uranus:~# -
Thehosthouse 256MB KVM
--- . ioping statistics ---
10 requests completed in 9037.7 ms, 416 iops 1.6 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.5/2.4/4.4/1.2 msI'd say for the price, under 3 pounds a month, this is a keeper! :)
I'm thinking iops and stable latency to storage medium is more important than write speed, so how about we change this test to "ioping . -c 10", would be interesting to see what kind of iops people get with their vpses :).
-
jollyworkshosting.com
Tiny Two packageSpeeds differ.
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 39.6021 seconds, 27.1 MB/s
or
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 28.5103 seconds, 37.7 MB/s
or
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 45.1631 seconds, 23.8 MB/s -
RamHost (UK-1, vz69)
vpn:~/ioping-0.6# ./ioping -c 5 /root/
4096 bytes from /root/ (ext3 /dev/sda1): request=1 time=0.4 ms
4096 bytes from /root/ (ext3 /dev/sda1): request=2 time=0.5 ms
4096 bytes from /root/ (ext3 /dev/sda1): request=3 time=0.5 ms
4096 bytes from /root/ (ext3 /dev/sda1): request=4 time=0.5 ms
4096 bytes from /root/ (ext3 /dev/sda1): request=5 time=0.4 ms--- /root/ (ext3 /dev/sda1) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4003.0 ms, 2296 iops, 9.0 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.4/0.4/0.5/0.1 msChicagoVPS (1GB Package, Chicago VPS14)
[root@server3 ioping-0.6]# ./ioping -c 5 /root/
4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /dev/simfs): request=1 time=22.0 ms
4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /dev/simfs): request=2 time=18.3 ms
4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /dev/simfs): request=3 time=16.4 ms
4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /dev/simfs): request=4 time=0.2 ms
4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /dev/simfs): request=5 time=19.0 ms--- /root/ (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4081.2 ms, 66 iops, 0.3 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/15.2/22.0/7.7 msAsuraHosting (VPS-256, Master Node)
root@ea:~/ioping-0.6# ./ioping -c 5 /root/
4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /dev/simfs): request=1 time=10.0 ms
4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /dev/simfs): request=2 time=0.2 ms
4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /dev/simfs): request=3 time=0.2 ms
4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /dev/simfs): request=4 time=0.2 ms
4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /dev/simfs): request=5 time=0.2 ms--- /root/ (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4016.5 ms, 459 iops, 1.8 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/2.2/10.0/3.9 msAsuraHosting - Unmanaged VPS Services at an Affordable Price starting at $4/month.
-
@AsuraHosting said: RamHost (UK-1, vz69)
vpn:~/ioping-0.6# ./ioping -c 5 /root/
4096 bytes from /root/ (ext3 /dev/sda1): request=1 time=0.4 ms
4096 bytes from /root/ (ext3 /dev/sda1): request=2 time=0.5 ms
4096 bytes from /root/ (ext3 /dev/sda1): request=3 time=0.5 ms
4096 bytes from /root/ (ext3 /dev/sda1): request=4 time=0.5 ms
4096 bytes from /root/ (ext3 /dev/sda1): request=5 time=0.4 ms--- /root/ (ext3 /dev/sda1) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4003.0 ms, 2296 iops, 9.0 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.4/0.4/0.5/0.1 msAnd we have a winner!
I bet this one works so much better than any BuyVM hitting 500MB/s+ sequential write but only gives couple hundred iops.
-
@mina said: I bet this one works so much better than any BuyVM
I'm sorry, what?
-22:20:09- Nurvus:~ :: root # ./ioping -c 5 /root/ 4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /dev/simfs): request=1 time=0.1 ms 4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /dev/simfs): request=2 time=0.2 ms 4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /dev/simfs): request=3 time=0.2 ms 4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /dev/simfs): request=4 time=0.2 ms 4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /dev/simfs): request=5 time=0.2 ms --- /root/ (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics --- 5 requests completed in 4005.7 ms, 5855 iops, 22.9 mb/s min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.2/0.2/0.0 ms
BuyVM - OpenVZ & KVM Based / TUN, PPTP, FUSE, SIT & GRE Enabled! / Stallion Control Panel || G+ / FB
Thanked by 1Mon5t3r -
@Aldryic said: I'm sorry, what?
best "what" of the week..
A. Mylo Von Ilengna || DoB May 1, 2009 || 8 Pigeon Die 4 KO
-
Burst.net $5.95/month 512mb OpenVZ VPS in Scranton
ioping . -c 5 4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=1 time=0.1 ms 4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=2 time=0.1 ms 4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=3 time=0.1 ms 4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=4 time=0.1 ms 4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=5 time=0.1 ms --- . (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics --- 5 requests completed in 4004.3 ms, 10482 iops, 40.9 mb/s min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.1/0.1/0.0 ms
Hostigation $30/year KVM VPS in LA:
ioping . -c 5 4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/vda1): request=1 time=0.1 ms 4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/vda1): request=2 time=0.1 ms 4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/vda1): request=3 time=0.2 ms 4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/vda1): request=4 time=0.2 ms 4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/vda1): request=5 time=0.2 ms --- . (ext4 /dev/vda1) ioping statistics --- 5 requests completed in 4003.5 ms, 6418 iops, 25.1 mb/s min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.2/0.2/0.0 ms
SecureDragon $16/year 128mb Xen
ioping . -c 5 4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=1 time=0.1 ms 4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=2 time=0.2 ms 4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=3 time=0.3 ms 4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=4 time=0.2 ms 4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=5 time=0.2 ms --- . (ext3 /dev/xvda1) ioping statistics --- 5 requests completed in 4001.9 ms, 4916 iops, 19.2 mb/s min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.2/0.3/0.1 ms
Home server (no raid, almost no load)
ioping . -c 5 4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/mapper/250g-250gb--p1): request=1 time=0.3 ms 4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/mapper/250g-250gb--p1): request=2 time=0.2 ms 4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/mapper/250g-250gb--p1): request=3 time=0.2 ms 4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/mapper/250g-250gb--p1): request=4 time=0.2 ms 4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/mapper/250g-250gb--p1): request=5 time=0.2 ms
-
AlienVPS 128mb (my only LEB so far)
4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /vz/private/5175): request=1 time=0.3 ms
4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /vz/private/5175): request=2 time=0.2 ms
4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /vz/private/5175): request=3 time=0.2 ms
4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /vz/private/5175): request=4 time=0.3 ms
4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /vz/private/5175): request=5 time=0.2 ms--- /root/ (simfs /vz/private/5175) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4002.3 ms, 4337 iops, 16.9 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/0.2/0.3/0.0 msBy the way, how do you quote properly?
-
Buyvm:
xxx@yyy:/tmp/ioping-0.6$ sudo ./ioping -c 5 /root/ [sudo] password for xxx: 4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /dev/simfs): request=1 time=0.2 ms 4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /dev/simfs): request=2 time=0.2 ms 4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /dev/simfs): request=3 time=28.6 ms 4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /dev/simfs): request=4 time=3.2 ms 4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /dev/simfs): request=5 time=4.9 ms --- /root/ (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics --- 5 requests completed in 4069.4 ms, 135 iops, 0.5 mb/s min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/7.4/28.6/10.8 ms
Misterhost.de
xxx@yyy:/tmp/ioping-0.6$ sudo ./ioping -c 5 /root/ [sudo] password for xxx: 4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /vz/private/319): request=1 time=0.1 ms 4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /vz/private/319): request=2 time=0.2 ms 4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /vz/private/319): request=3 time=0.2 ms 4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /vz/private/319): request=4 time=0.2 ms 4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /vz/private/319): request=5 time=0.2 ms --- /root/ (simfs /vz/private/319) ioping statistics --- 5 requests completed in 4001.7 ms, 6158 iops, 24.1 mb/s min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.2/0.2/0.0 ms
Server4You (not really lowend)
xxx@yyy:/tmp/ioping-0.6$ sudo ./ioping -c 5 /root/ [sudo] password for xxx: 4096 bytes from /root/ (vzfs /dev/vzfs): request=1 time=0.1 ms 4096 bytes from /root/ (vzfs /dev/vzfs): request=2 time=0.3 ms 4096 bytes from /root/ (vzfs /dev/vzfs): request=3 time=0.1 ms 4096 bytes from /root/ (vzfs /dev/vzfs): request=4 time=0.2 ms 4096 bytes from /root/ (vzfs /dev/vzfs): request=5 time=0.2 ms --- /root/ (vzfs /dev/vzfs) ioping statistics --- 5 requests completed in 4004.0 ms, 5453 iops, 21.3 mb/s min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.2/0.3/0.1 ms
Cripperz.sg
xxx@yyy:/tmp/ioping-0.6$ sudo ./ioping -c 5 /root/ 4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /dev/simfs): request=1 time=1.2 ms 4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /dev/simfs): request=2 time=0.9 ms 4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /dev/simfs): request=3 time=0.3 ms 4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /dev/simfs): request=4 time=0.6 ms 4096 bytes from /root/ (simfs /dev/simfs): request=5 time=1.1 ms --- /root/ (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics --- 5 requests completed in 4016.5 ms, 1176 iops, 4.6 mb/s min/avg/max/mdev = 0.3/0.9/1.2/0.3 ms
I guess misterhost.de wins :D
Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
In this Discussion
- Adam January 28
- Aldryic January 31
- Andri January 28
- AsuraHosting January 31
- bachir January 28
- Damian January 27
- dancom96 January 31
- dmmcintyre3 January 31
- dnom January 28
- fan January 28
- Francisco January 31
- gsrdgrdghd January 31
- Inglar January 28
- Jacob January 28
- Jeffrey January 28
- Jesse January 31
- Kairus January 31
- Kuro January 27
- Legendlink January 30
- mina January 31
- miTgiB January 31
- Mon5t3r January 31
- NateN34 January 28
- prometeus January 29
- qenox January 31
- sleddog January 31
- SSDNodes January 28
- vmhosts January 29
- Wira_Soenaryo January 31
- yomero January 31